<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for einarvollset</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/einarvollset/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/einarvollset/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:25:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: iAd Fill Rates &amp;#038; eCPM</title><link>http://lcrnd.com/blog/iad-fill-rates-ecpm/#comment-131007281</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The fill rate seems to vary greatly - particularly if you see a spike in usage. It seems like the fill rate increases over time if your number of users stay the same.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I know some people who's had success with Mobclix - basically running iAd as the preferred ad network, and then backfilling with others. Might be worth checking out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:25:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AOL Scoops Up Rally Up To Boost Their Mobile Team</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/31/aol-rally-up/#comment-73632307</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, an anonymous hater. How original. Well done sir.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:52:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AOL Scoops Up Rally Up To Boost Their Mobile Team</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/31/aol-rally-up/#comment-73595008</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats Sol! A really awesome team AOL is getting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:50:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: America&amp;#8217;s RSVP for the Global Century</title><link>http://mattmaroon.com/?p=595#comment-3974799</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fair enough. Lemme know when you are.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:15:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: America&amp;#8217;s RSVP for the Global Century</title><link>http://mattmaroon.com/?p=595#comment-3965871</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well said. Let me buy you a beer some time? You in the Bay Area?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:12:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Whiner Jerkins All Hands Meeting Powerpoint Revealed</title><link>http://mattmaroon.com/?p=539#comment-3047226</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I laughed so hard my coffee came out through my nose. You owe me a new keyboard..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:22:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will this election end in a civil war? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/10/willThisElectionEndInACivi.html#comment-2986282</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Related NY Times piece: &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/10/opinion/10brooks.html?_r=1&amp;amp;ref=opinion&amp;amp;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/10/opinion/10brooks.html?_r=1&amp;amp;ref=opinion&amp;amp;oref=slogin"&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:09:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The answer is in (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/06/theAnswerIsIn.html#comment-2909289</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If the House had not passed the bailout, would we be blaming the fall on the lack of action? Given that action was taken, why can't I blame the fall on the bailout?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Honestly; it seems the same type of fall prompted enough lawmakers to change their mind last week. What changed?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:22:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The answer is in (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/06/theAnswerIsIn.html#comment-2909234</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it just me, or is anyone else getting sick of the "Warren Buffet said X, so that must be true" statements coming out all over? How about some independent thought people?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:13:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sarah Teen USA Palin (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/25/sarahTeenUsaPalin.html#comment-2649462</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you Dave, I forgive you for your support of the Paulson plan now :-D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:54:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congress should ratify the Paulson plan as-is (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/26/congressShouldRatifyThePau.html#comment-2649329</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I vehemently disagree. I don't buy that this is the only way to save us from a crash. Multiple credible economists have suggested other, cheaper alternatives with less of the moral hazard of bailing out Wall St.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With ex-CEO of Goldman Sachs coming up with an urgent plan to save Goldman Sachs and an eminent investor with $5bn in preferred GS stock coming out in favor, I call BS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:43:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congress should ratify the Paulson plan as-is (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/26/congressShouldRatifyThePau.html#comment-2649187</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Come on Dave, follow the money here: Does Warren Buffet stand to make a killing on the plan as proposed? Yes. Will that cloud his judgment? Of course it will!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:37:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congress should ratify the Paulson plan as-is (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/26/congressShouldRatifyThePau.html#comment-2649077</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Amen to that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:34:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congress should ratify the Paulson plan as-is (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/26/congressShouldRatifyThePau.html#comment-2649043</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"If people debate the expertise of Warren Buffet they doubt a man with a clear conscience"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Uhm.. no; they debate the bias of a person who's got $5bn in _preferred_ stock in Golden Slacks. Now what are the two main corporations that will benefit from this bailout (stop calling it a national rescue plan!)? Oh yeah Morgan Stanley and .....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:31:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congress should ratify the Paulson plan as-is (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/26/congressShouldRatifyThePau.html#comment-2648990</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Amen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:27:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain to suspend campaign? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/24/mccainToSuspendCampaign.html#comment-2580647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry. That was immature. But it stands.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:58:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain to suspend campaign? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/24/mccainToSuspendCampaign.html#comment-2580641</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Puuuuuuleeeaaaase.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:57:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain to suspend campaign? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/24/mccainToSuspendCampaign.html#comment-2580423</link><description>&lt;p&gt;..and the other shoe drops: VP debates to be "rescheduled" to some "yet to be determined" date:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/24/mccain-camp-to-propose-postponing-vp-debate/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/24/mccain-camp-to-propose-postponing-vp-debate/"&gt;http://politicalticker.blog...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No I totally agree, I mean, christ, why does she need to debate at all? She doesn't speak to the press..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:53:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain to suspend campaign? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/24/mccainToSuspendCampaign.html#comment-2574194</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Rep Joe Barton (R-Texas) saying "Paulson bill dead on arrival" and that "this will take weeks". Does that mean McCain is gonna suspend until after November? Didn't think so. McCain shoots from the hip again. Dolt.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:28:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain to suspend campaign? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/24/mccainToSuspendCampaign.html#comment-2574072</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I call BS on this. He's loosing, he knows it so he's throwing another Hail Sarah.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:21:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain to suspend campaign? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/24/mccainToSuspendCampaign.html#comment-2573866</link><description>&lt;p&gt;CNN reporting that Obama contacted McCain first.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:10:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain to suspend campaign? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/24/mccainToSuspendCampaign.html#comment-2573736</link><description>&lt;p&gt;BBC reporting it too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:01:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick question (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/21/quickQuestion.html#comment-2526544</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No. Why:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:57:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bit.ly launches today (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/08/bitlyLaunchesToday.html#comment-838329</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A couple of questions: When will they have enough data to allow developer access? Will &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt;  allow access to their raw data stream? I guess it might be difficult to argue that &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; shouldn't, but Twitter somehow must..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:36:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Podcast with the Gnip guys (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/01/podcastWithTheGnipGuys.html#comment-796040</link><description>&lt;p&gt;gee.. That sounded harsher than I meant it to be. All I'm saying is, coming from an experimental background it strikes me that simulating Twitter's workload and showing superior performance should be a minimum barrier to entry, no?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">einarvollset</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 02:24:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>