<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for edraper</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/edraper/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/edraper/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:59:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Light as a Feather</title><link>http://crazycool.co.uk/blog/2008/4/7/Light+as+a+Feather#comment-309911</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You know it dude!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">edraper</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:59:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adventures in Merb</title><link>http://crazycool.co.uk/blog/2008/3/17/Adventures+in+Merb#comment-251728</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely, you're right - however as a Rails guy looking into Merb, one of the most interesting aspects is it's performance, and it's ability to handle requests in a thread-safe manner, improving things like file uploads. Unfortunately, with the "mutex" config option turned off, ActiveRecord isn't usable with Merb currently, and so the natural choice for me, and anyone else interested in getting the best out of Merb at the minute, is probably going to be DataMapper as far as I can see. So the issues I came across, while mostly related to DataMapper, are pertinent really to the whole Merb experience.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However besides what I mentioned in the post, I haven't really run into too many other problems - I definitely think that over time Merb has the potential to become a really powerful framework.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">edraper</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:34:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tyred</title><link>http://crazycool.co.uk/blog/2008/3/15/Tyred#comment-237832</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your comment. Ah I guess it's a hazard of the job for you then! But yeah, I think that had the bolt not gone in completely straight, it could have shredded the tyre, and that certainly wouldn't have been nice to deal with. Fairly lucky really.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've tried to find out today who is responsible for sweeping the local roads, to see how often they are swept (the road I picked the bolt up on is one of the main routes on the way to the local dump for a lot of the local area, so should be swept more regularly than most). I was told that no-one has a responsibility for sweeping the road itself, only the gutter/verge. I was also told that this is "where most of the stuff in the road ends up anyway" - except for the bolt that ended up in my tyre of course!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">edraper</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:22:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Updates</title><link>http://crazycool.co.uk/blog/2007/12/21/Updates/#comment-43644</link><description>&lt;p&gt;threaded reply, nice!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">edraper</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 04:50:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Updates</title><link>http://crazycool.co.uk/blog/2007/12/21/Updates/#comment-43641</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a test comment, to test the Disqus comment stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">edraper</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 04:49:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>