http://disqus.com/by/edonn/enSun, 29 Dec 2013 03:47:05 -0000http://www.enmast.com/2013/12/give-chance/#comment-1180028766<p>I agree! I suppose it'd be ok if it comes naturally but this does sound a little too self-serving... Makes doing favors seem more like a transaction than anything else.</p>Donn LeeSun, 29 Dec 2013 03:47:05 -0000http://www.creativitypost.com/create/how_geniuses_think#comment-787161492<p>I love Richard Feynman! I may not agree with much of what was said in this article, but I do agree that Feynman's a genius because he contributed much to the world, had a great wit about him, and seemed like such a genuinely nice guy.</p><p>Seriously though, as much as I enjoyed some bits of the article, I couldn't help thinking about how superficial it seemed. What's the definition of genius here? Is genius defined by a way/ways of thinking, or by contributions to the world?</p><p>If a person thought in all the ways a "genius" thought as listed here, would that person be a genius even though he or she didn't contribute much to the world? And alternatively, if a person contributed much to the world, but didn't fit the mould of how a "genius" thought, would that person be considered a genius?</p><p>Feel a little sorry for the way Marilyn vos Savant was dissed here as well. Ambition, circumstance, and personality would have shaped the ways geniuses may have contributed their little part to the world, too.</p>Donn LeeSun, 03 Feb 2013 03:10:00 -0000http://blogs.hbr.org/bregman/2013/01/stop-focusing-on-your-performa.html#comment-785816675<p>I love this post. Reminds me of the saying in Hamlet: "for there is nothing</p><p>either good or bad, but thinking makes it so." Just reading it helped calm my nerves for an upcoming make-or-break situation.</p>Donn LeeFri, 01 Feb 2013 10:09:00 -0000http://www.keepaa.com/i/d/db47860db#comment-13381323<p>Watch it people. These points are getting a little pointed...</p>Donn LeeMon, 27 Jul 2009 07:37:40 -0000