<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for eaquilae</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/eaquilae/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/eaquilae/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:32:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Two Important Ideas You Can Learn About Wildlife Photography From The Things You've Been Overlooking</title><link>http://www.7photographyquestions.com/members/wildlifephotography.html#comment-2327401</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really like your black bear picture.  Looks like you were very close.  You did a great job of framing and or cropping the long beaked bird.  Would like to know more about your pictures, lens used, aperture, etc.  Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eaquilae</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:32:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Is the Most Important Secret to Adding More Wow Impact to Your Photographs?</title><link>http://www.7photographyquestions.com/members/addingimpact.html#comment-1923825</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for answering.  I have a Canon which will go to 3200, but I haven't&lt;br&gt;tried it yet.  I will though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eaquilae</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:27:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Is the Most Important Secret to Adding More Wow Impact to Your Photographs?</title><link>http://www.7photographyquestions.com/members/addingimpact.html#comment-1909105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I see you used ISO 6400.  I've seen where people often comment on how low an ISO they use to prevent noise?  Your pictures are great at ISO 6400.  What is the story on ISO?  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eaquilae</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:14:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: P#13: Show Notes for Landscape Photography -- An Interview with Jennifer Wu</title><link>http://www.7photographyquestions.com/2008/08/p13-show-notes-for-landscape-photography-an-interview-with-j.html#comment-1730058</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Some really great ideas here.  I really like her approach to composition.  I would not have thought about using a tripod for daytime landscapes.  Also her discussion on Depth of focus or hyperfocal distance was great.  I seem to have a problem with that.  I even got out an old camera and remembered how it use to be on  the lens.  I guess that is difficult for our new zoom lenses though.  Thank you. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eaquilae</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:10:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Almost Unknown, Counter-Intuitive Approach To Photographing Flowers That Produces Stunning Results</title><link>http://www.7photographyquestions.com/members/photographingflowers.html#comment-1146372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My favorite is your first picture with the blue flower and the feather.  The picture is made much more interesting by the feather even though it is not the subject.  Tony Sweet's point to look for the background first to make an impressive / interesting picture makes a lot of sense.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eaquilae</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:43:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>