Disqus - Latest Comments for drmichaelstohler

Re: The GOP had at most 55 Senators during Bush’s presidency

drmichaelstohler — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:43:09 -0000

I have to question that ANY of the Dems in congress believe that they actually represent me or even care what I think. If they did, do you actually think they would have pigeon-holed billions of Tarp funds to be used for pork projects just prior to the 2012 campaign? I don't *THINK* so!!!!

Re: Stop Global Warming: The Sad Truth Video

drmichaelstohler — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:00:07 -0000

LOL!
"Flawed and stupid"???
Your LINK is to a charature assasination by way of book review absolutely dripping with liberal bias and opinion and totally void of scientific fact..... UNLIKE the links ofered in Crichton's book.
Try discussing reproducable scientific FACTS instead of opinions....and THEN I'll give a darn about what you post. So far.....you've just made my point that while there's ample liberal agenda behind it, so far the Theory of Global Warming...is VOID of science to back it up.

Re: Stop Global Warming: The Sad Truth Video

drmichaelstohler — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:50:58 -0000

Mr SimonTurner, while I have a few labels that would apply to you, I suggest you refrain from trying to label anyone who objects to an obvious liberal agenda as someone from "the religious right". When you stoop to name calling, you probably won't like the names that eventually get applied to yourself.

Please choose any of the following points and try to follow the facts:

A) Global Warming was no longer a valid scientific hypothisis as soon as it was discovered that "the hockey stick" was a matter of selective data interpretation so the original studies were not only flawed, they were intentionally biased to suit a preselected outcome.

B) It was no longer valid after we launched over a dozen low orbit satellites at over $125Million each to monitor upper atmospheric CO2 levels....and found out they weren't changing. In fact further research leads us to believe that CO2 doesn't cause warming. Historically the archeological evidence is that warming causes CO2 production through increases in ocean metabolic processes. IE: the Greenhouse Gas Theory got it exactly backward.

C) It was no longer a valid hypothesis when science discovered that man is actually only 3rd in CO2 production, producing somewhere between point one and point zero one percent of global CO2. That's one tenth of a percent to one hundreth of one percent.....(IE: .1 to .01%) on an annual basis! That's totally insignificant! I'm sure this will be a big blow to your ego so you better set down before I tell you that the number one and number two producers of CO2 are Volcanoes and Termites. That's right, the CO2 production you're so worried about.......is dwarfed by insects. But mainly volcanoes. In fact if you actually look at the global temperature data from the last century you'll find that warming AND CO2 levels were NOT associated with mankind's industrial increases but rather with the volcanoes early last century.

The movie "An Inconvenient Truth" has been ruled so fraudulent in the UK that it can't be shown to school children without disclaimers dismissing MOST of it's content.

As for some of your other points: NO sir, there's NOT been much scientific data that's actually reproducable or peer reviewed that actually supports the original theory, and absolutely NONE AT ALL that actually connects global temperatures to HUMAN activity. I repeat NONE AT ALL.

The reason I pointed out Crichton's novel "State of Fear" is because he *WAS* a Harvard MD who set out to write a novel about global warming, only when he ACTUALLY did his research on the subject he discovered what a farce and charade the liberal and scientific communities have perpetrated in order to expedite funding for darn near anything....wanna fund a polar expedition? Just play the Global Warming Card and liberals will crawl out of their own skins to fund the project!

And before you even TRY to discuss this further.....do yourself a favor: get a copy and go READ the book. I'm sure even someone like YOU could understand it's concepts. And if you're REALLY interested in the subject....take a look at some of the scientific data (all peer reviewed and validated....UNLIKE anything you were thinking about referencing) his book points out.

As I've stated before on many occasions: *IF* you can actually demonstrate global warming as a direct result of human activity....*I'll* be the first to join the fight to save the planet. You won't and you can't. So until you do, knock off the name calling until you KNOW something about the subject, because so far, all you've demonstrated that you know is....you're OPINION.

Re: Stop Global Warming: The Sad Truth Video

drmichaelstohler — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:43:47 -0000

Please. Take my name off your mailing list.
The global warming videos are pathetic. I personally believe the theory of global warming WAS a good scientific hypothisis but all the valid evidence gathered since it was original fielded has shown that the concept of human activity having had a direct impact on the global temperature is wrong. The challenge is still out there: Demonstrate ANY valid scientific connection between human contributions to atmospheric gasses making any difference and I'll be the first to join the battle. In the meantime the whole concept of Global Warming has become a liberal agenda with NO scientific basis in fact. Get a copy of Michael Crichton's "State of Fear" and read it. THEN go to the interenet links he pionts out.

The hundreds of millions of dollars already wasted on trying to forward the concept of global warming is pathetic and COULD have been spent on feeding several third world nations. Instead it's wasted on an emotional liberal agenda with no basis in scientific fact.