Disqus - Latest Comments for dpklaw

Re: http://nolagrrlnyc.tumblr.com/post/35343975537

David — Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:00:05 -0000

You're doing great, and doing the right thing. I lost my mom not that long ago, and the battle to get her 1) out of the house and 2) into care probably cost us dearly. You can only do the best you can do, and it sounds like you're doing that. Don't worry about what other people think or say; your mom, your family, your decisions. Hang in there!

Re: http://davidkendall.tumblr.com/post/34302710603

David — Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:14:23 -0000

Of course, that would presume that the pro-choice and anti-choice sides both accept the premise that there actually are moral ambiguities, which is simply not the case. Those whose objections to abortion have their basis in religion look at things far differently than those who support abortion based on science (using the terms "religion" and "science" in their broadest sense).

Re: awesome husband is awesome

David — Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:52:30 -0000

Congratulations, to both of you (because behind every successful man.....is a surprised mother-in-law). Seriously, best wishes!

Re: http://sdscomments.tumblr.com/post/30597079876

David — Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:24:27 -0000

Not an argument; just an observation. You can't say "we don't envy" when everyone knows we do. Whether envy can have a "good" effect or "bad" effect on the person who is envious is beside the point, and not what Ms. Rice was talking about in any event.

Re: http://davidkendall.tumblr.com/post/5183978108

David — Thu, 31 May 2012 14:02:05 -0000

You are working awfully hard to convince of something that you already admit -- that a secret is not a lie. This I know, and so do you. As you said, a secret is a lie in the making, or, stated more precisely a secret has the potential to put the holder of the secret in the position to tell a lie. The secret in and of itself is not the lie. Now, you may wish to believe that anyone who keeps a secret is a liar, but that is simply not the case. The potential to lie is not the same thing as being a liar, any more than wishing another person dead makes you a murderer. You may wish that somebody was dead, and you may be in the position of bringing that death about, but unless you take the affirmative step of plunging a knife into that person's heart, you are not a murderer.

And that brings us back to my original premise: words have specific meanings. One may not wish to accept that fact, but it is a fact.

Re: http://davidkendall.tumblr.com/post/5183978108

David — Wed, 30 May 2012 22:07:21 -0000

You are certainly entitled to agree with Leo. However, I am not making excuses. I have been simply pointing out that words have specific meanings. If you want to accurately and correctly communicate, you have to understand the specific meanings of words (and actions) and use them (or interpret them) correctly. It is the failure to understand this simple concept that causes so many problems in this world.

The original question -- is a secret considered a lie? -- highlights that point. A secret is not a lie. To reiterate, a lie is an affirmative statement made with the intent to deliberately mislead another. A secret is something -- fact, fantasy, or information -- that is kept from view or knowledge. It is not intended to mislead or deceive another. In fact, it is often told to another to establish or confirm trust. The fact that a third party might not be aware of the secret does not make the secret a lie. It's simply a secret.

Pretending, deflecting, acting, silence -- none of these are "lies." They are actions that can help perpetuate lies, but they can also help disseminate truth. If, for example, being silent can further either a lie or the truth, then silence -- in and of itself -- cannot be a lie. That is why a clear understanding of the meanings of words, and how to properly use them, is so important to effective communication.

Re: http://davidkendall.tumblr.com/post/22149548445

David — Tue, 01 May 2012 11:13:38 -0000

As I said, I don't approve of the comments and acknowledge that they're out there, making the gaming experience less than ideal. But, at least as far as WoW is concerned, they have ways to make the community better for those who are unwilling to put up with the ignorance - whether heartfelt or just trolling - exhibited by a relative minority of the players. I freely and regularly use the "ignore" button so that I don't have to put up with the nitwits and ignoramuses I run across, and that one little feature gives me blissful peace from the more obnoxious trolls.

Unfortunately, ignorance, misogyny, homophobia, and racism are part of the make-up of some people, and that is not going to change any time soon, no matter what we do. Those we know in real life, we can try to educate as best we can, and if we don't get to them, maybe the education we put out there actually will trickle down to their kids. (Look at the entire generation of kids growing up who will think nothing of the fact that the President of the United States is black. Their parents may think it odd, but it's the norm for their kids.) And, as I mentioned in the original post, there are people who pretend to be misogynistic or homophobic simply because they like to push peoples' buttons and get a reaction; that won't change, either, because there are some people who just like to be jerks -- and they have a right to be jerks. We may not like it, we may not want to deal with them, but they have a right to be stupid - intentionally or otherwise. Thankfully Blizzard recognizes that, in an anonymous world, where they're not going to ban these ignorant people because it will cost Blizzard money to do so, there are people who don't want to deal with "bad behavior" and Blizzard gives those people the option of ignoring the "evil-doers." (The same kind of thing happens in pretty much any on-line environment. Try playing Call of Duty, or Gears of War on-line, and deal with the trash-talking and name-calling there. Anonymity gives people power.) The "ignore" option is not an ideal solution, but it can be used to make the gaming world better for those who want to use it.

No doubt, the behavior, the words, the attitudes exhibited on-line are, at best, off-putting. And, as people become more aware of the impact their hurtful thoughts and attitudes have on others, that behavior will probably decline. However, I doubt that it will ever disappear, because some people just like to be jerks. But that's the nature of some people, and that's not ever going to change, because it never has. There has always been some segment of the population that can be considered "jerky." Since we cannot stop that, the best we can do is hope to contain it.

Re: http://davidkendall.tumblr.com/post/5183978108

David — Thu, 01 Dec 2011 23:12:10 -0000

You're assuming that there is a common goal among the very different actions you're talking about. That is simply not the case. Moreover, if you are unwilling to accept the very basic fact that words have different and distinct meanings, intended to differentiate separate and distinct kinds of actions, conduct, and results, then we cannot have a meaningful dialogue. You are certainly entitled to your beliefs, but if those beliefs are not grounded on a clear understanding of very basic facts, then you are simply making unsupported, and unsupportable, statements.

Re: http://davidkendall.tumblr.com/post/5183978108

David — Wed, 30 Nov 2011 22:15:43 -0000

There are two main problems with the premises your are presenting. The first is that you assume that "truth" and "fact" are the same thing. They are not. The second is your premise that the word "lie" has a variety of meanings, all of which dove-tail into the premise you want me to accept. The word "lie" and the concept of "lying" has only one meaning: it is an intentional untruth. It is a false statement made with the deliberate intent to deceive another.

Your "points" don't satisfy this definition, which is the only definition of a "lie." For instance, a secret is not intended to mislead (even assuming the secret is "true"); it is intended to keep a confidence.

"Pretending/acting" (which are two entirely different things) may or may not be "intended to deceive," and may or may not include "false statements," but according to you, all actors are liars, and that's not the case. They're "acting." They are pretending to be someone else for purposes of entertainment, not deception.

"Keeping silent" obviously does not involve any statement of any kind so, by definition, "keeping silent" cannot be considered "lying". It could be considered nonfeasance, but it is not malfeasance.

I'm happy to engage you in a discussion, but you have to understand that words have specific meanings. Broad based statements and assumptions without support and reasoned analysis, does nothing to further your argument. You obviously want to argue that lying takes many forms and shapes, but just because you say something with conviction doesn't make it so. What you seem to be saying is that there are many ways to deceive, mislead, and misdirect people, and that's a statement with which I can agree. But not all of those ways involves lying.

Re: http://davidkendall.tumblr.com/post/5183978108

David — Tue, 29 Nov 2011 17:09:11 -0000

Thanks for the comment, although your understanding of what constitutes a "lie" is somewhat divorced from what a "lie" actually is. You are also assuming that a "secret" always involves a "truth," when that is obviously not the case.

Re: http://awkwardlyawesome.tumblr.com/post/7351686346

David — Fri, 08 Jul 2011 21:14:33 -0000

Piecing together what appears to have happened, just to confirm what you already know: guys are pigs, and generally self-centered and insensitive. (I should know.) But the good news is that many grow out of it, and some actually grow out of it before they're 30. And someone with as much to offer as you have will find the right guy; it might take some time, but he's out there. Being patient stinks, but it does work in the long run. And if you need me and my boys to go do some 'splaining to someone for you, let me know.....

Re: http://mabelmoments.tumblr.com/post/7263868522

David — Tue, 05 Jul 2011 13:51:33 -0000

Nice shot! And congratulations on making the radar! (By the way, had no idea until today that you were on twitter as well! Hope you don't mind another follower there!)

Re: http://davidkendall.tumblr.com/post/5708370379

David — Mon, 23 May 2011 19:50:18 -0000

Thanks for getting back to me; I appreciate your response. I look forward to checking out the site as it develops. Good luck!

Re: http://davidkendall.tumblr.com/post/5635297204

David — Fri, 20 May 2011 11:30:34 -0000

Good to know. Thanks!

Re: http://davidkendall.tumblr.com/post/5635297204

David — Thu, 19 May 2011 23:58:34 -0000

Thanks for the assist; just so you know, I always link through to photographers when I can; this photo I came across at the website to which you are taken when you click through, and which appears at the bottom of the photo on your dash as the source. Sorry for any confusion.

Re: http://davidkendall.tumblr.com/post/5635297204

David — Thu, 19 May 2011 23:57:49 -0000

Just so you know, I always link through to photographers when I can; this photo I came across at the website to which you are taken when you click through, and which appears at the bottom of the photo on your dash as the source. Sorry for any confusion.

Re: 7 things I’m thankful for this week

David — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 11:09:45 -0000

I don't know you, but I know Ed, and some others who follow you, and am glad I just discovered your tumblr. My philosophy on tumblr, and anything I've ever posted anywhere, is that it's your stuff, not anyone else's. You're not writing and posting pictures to entertain strangers; you're not trying to sell magazines, or influence thought. You're writing for yourself, your friends, and those who care about you and, if somewhere along the way, you happen to meet new people and make new friends, that's a bonus. But I don't ever let anyone else's opinions influence what I write, or what I post; if someone is bored by what I write, that's on them, and it's an easy matter to simply unfollow. So, from a complete stranger who likes to learn about new and interesting folks I happen across on-line, I say, "Post away!" and let the haters go off and sulk in a corner somewhere.

Re: http://davidkendall.tumblr.com/post/363404720

David — Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:06:14 -0000

I have no idea. I just quoted from the linked article. As I've mentioned, I'm a finder of interesting pictures, and when there's a caption that explains an image, I try to quote it. That's what I did here. Hope that helps. :D

Re: http://awkwardlyawesome.tumblr.com/post/3569308788

David — Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:12:51 -0000

I've lived on the east coast for most of my life, but I also lived in Ohio for about 8 years. I loved the midwest; it was much calmer, much friendlier, and much nicer. That said, there's so much to be said for living in and around NYC, if you like that kind of life style. There is a difference between visiting here, and living here, but if it's something you'd be excited by, and will regret if you don't do it, I'd suggest you give it some very serious consideration, and here's why. I made three very serious life choices early on, two of which I regret, and those two choices are choices I made where I didn't make the "big move." The one where I did make the big move -- which involved quitting a great job, ending a good relationship, and uprooting myself in order to go to law school on my own dime -- is the one choice that I'm glad I made.

Life is a scary, fun, nerve-wracking, enjoyable ride, and you only get one turn on the wheel, so it's actually okay to take chances and do things that you think you'll enjoy. If you've got a job waiting, and a place to live, and prospects, it might be the adventure you're looking for! And if there's any advice you need, the ask box is always open!

Re: http://awkwardlyawesome.tumblr.com/post/3569308788

David — Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:12:32 -0000

Oops! Posted the same comment twice. I must really mean it!

Re: http://davidkendall.tumblr.com/post/3361063453

David — Sat, 19 Feb 2011 21:03:17 -0000

I can't tell you how much it means that you take the time to send me kisses from Australia; you're one of my favorite tumblr-mates, and I'm so happy that you took the time to remember me.

I'm okay. They let me out of the hospital after 24 hours. They don't have an explanation for what happened; gave me some medicine to take for a couple weeks, then I have to follow up with the doctor. It's the first time I've had anything like this, and it came out of the blue, so they wanted to "observe me" for 24 hours. They said I could go back to "normal" and if anything happens, follow-up with the doctor. So, that's what I'll do.

Thanks again for caring!

Re: http://davidkendall.tumblr.com/post/3260715180

David — Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:00:52 -0000

Well, you are, and you should know it.

And you're not the first person who said I should have an "ask box." My "comment boxes" aren't cutting it anymore? You think I should actually open up the old "ask hole" . . . so to speak?

Re: http://davidkendall.tumblr.com/post/363404720

David — Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:34:45 -0000

No, I'm not. I'm just a finder of interesting pictures that are appealing to me, and I like to share.

Re: http://davidkendall.tumblr.com/post/1281176549

David — Sun, 10 Oct 2010 03:29:17 -0000

He's really a talented guy, and plays Bobby Goren so well that I'm surprised when I see him in other movies and it's such a totally different character.

And isn't there something exciting about seeing a star you like in person? Gives you a kind of a charge, doesn't it?

Re: http://davidkendall.tumblr.com/post/1230591599

David — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 18:51:31 -0000

....heh.....you're exactly right. Of course, to that we can always reply, "And if my grandmother had wheels, she'd be a trolley car."