<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of diskgrinder</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/diskgrinder/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/diskgrinder/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 04:53:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Kevin Pork</title><link>(u'http://diskgrinder.blogspot.com/2009/09/kevin-pork.html',%2027288673L)#comment-27288673</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That pig is gorgeous. Please put up some more. I'm a dog girl, myself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">squidblossom</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 04:53:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 reasons why the Apple iPhone sucks</title><link>(u'http://www.brandish.tv/2007/01/10/10-reasons-why-.html',%20490983636L)#comment-490983636</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, Gods it will be funny when all the trashers have the shit kicked out of them by the iPhone's success.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am giddy with glee. Keep making those irrational and retarded claims, haters. it's all the more delicious when every single one of your predictions fail to come to pass.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 02:38:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Surface Computing initiatives&amp;#8230;</title><link>(u'http://scobleizer.com/2007/05/30/more-on-microsofts-surface-computing-initiatives/',%209680064L)#comment-9680064</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is laughable. By their own admission, this "Surface" is nothing more than a concept. And a terribly implemented one at that. Cameras? Tagged objects? A frosted glass table with a projector under it? Come on people, this is a joke. As already pointed out Jeff Han has actually made multi-touch panel computing a reality, and after 6 years all MS has is a table with a projector under it? Bravo. You made the most expensive Lite_Brite in the world. I have no problem predicting that this is product is going to go nowhere.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 19:30:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RE: Storm Worm's virulence may change tactics</title><link>(u'http://www.networkworld.com/nwlookup.jsp?rid=109515',%20289361352L)#comment-289361352</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This situation is all too common in almost all reports on spyware, botnets, spambots, trojans and viruses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Primarily because the simple fact of the matter is that the only platform and software combination affected by all of the above is a Microsoft Windows PC running Internet Explorer and Outlook. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 12:11:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KDFW Suspends Rebecca Aguilar After Controversial "Ambush"</title><link>(u'http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2007/10/kdfw_suspends_rebecca_aguilar.php',%20113550691L)#comment-113550691</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Only the gun crazies in the USA would come up with a term like "gun hater" and pretend it's pejorative.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 01:42:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple's hype phone</title><link>(u'http://www.popmatters.com/pm/article/apples-hype-phone',%20211315653L)#comment-211315653</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apple @ 174.36    on 10/22/07.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;HHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Analysts. What a crock.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:27:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#039;s new in Blade Runner: The Final Cut?</title><link>(u'http://sciencefictionworld.com/films/science-fiction-films/156-whats-new-in-blade-runner-the-final-cut.html',%2016294589L)#comment-16294589</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They better have damn well gotten rid of that idiotic \"I\'ve got four skin jobs walking the streets\" line from when Deckard meets Bryant in his office. The ONLY reason that line is in there (in the 1992 Director\'s Cut it is painfully obvious the line was hacked in) is to facilitate the voiceover, specifically Deckard equating Bryant\'s use of the term \"skinjobs\" as a racist term.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please, tell me that line is gone. I would really waffle on buying this thing if they haven\'t fixed that glaring error.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 15:50:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#039;s new in Blade Runner: The Final Cut?</title><link>(u'http://sciencefictionworld.com/films/science-fiction-films/156-whats-new-in-blade-runner-the-final-cut.html',%2016294542L)#comment-16294542</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Not revisionism&lt;br&gt;Written by Ulric&lt;br&gt;Personally, I loved the voice over and happy ending.. it's too bad Riddley doesn't like them"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They are crap tacked by producers meddling with the artists vision because the producers themselves were too stupid to understand the story. Good riddance.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:36:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Truth That Dare Not Speak: The CES Keynote Sucked</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/07/the-truth-that-dare-not-speak-the-ces-keynote-sucked/',%2072141467L)#comment-72141467</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"seems like they aren’t as exciting."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seems? They "seem" like they aren't as exciting (Microsoft Keynotes) because, people, the turth is they suck. Would anyone care to run down the list of dorky vapourware one-ofs that Microsoft perenially introduces, only to watch as the product disappears, never to be heard of again?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyone here have a Mira? A copy of Microsoft Bob? One of those idiotic watches? How many Origami devices got sold?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And seriously people. Apple gave us the iPhone and Microsoft demoes a giant table that isn't actually a touch device, but hides a Vista PC with a projector and a collection of infra red detectors?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Give it a rest. There is no need to defend the Microsoft CES Keynotes because there is nothing to defend.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You want to see where the personal computer and consumer electronics are going? You watch Steve Jobs and Apple. It's that simple.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:22:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Truth That Dare Not Speak: The CES Keynote Sucked</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2008/01/07/the-truth-that-dare-not-speak-the-ces-keynote-sucked/',%2072141470L)#comment-72141470</link><description>&lt;p&gt;""Dan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“If Steve Jobs got on a stage and showed off a voice controlled car messaging and entertainment system, prototype camera phone with HUD […] the fanboys would be twitching in pools of drool.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That’s because if Steve Jobs showed that stuff, you’d be able to buy most of it that day."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Damn straight, Dan, right on the money."Real artists ship".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:26:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Coming Soon to Texas: A Master's Degree in Creation Science</title><link>(u'http://motherjones.com/node/7101',%2066516525L)#comment-66516525</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone who pays for a Masters in Creation Science may actually be quite annoyed when at the end of years of study and thousands of dollars, they just get handed another Bible for their trouble.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 22:12:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Coming Soon to Texas: A Master's Degree in Creation Science</title><link>(u'http://motherjones.com/node/7101',%2064538146L)#comment-64538146</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone who pays for a Masters in Creation Science may actually be quite annoyed when at the end of years of study and thousands of dollars, they just get handed another Bible for their trouble.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 22:12:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Macs still aren't right for most businesses - Small Business Questions and Answers</title><link>(u'http://smallbusiness.blogs.cnnmoney.cnn.com/2008/05/30/why-macs-still-arent-right-for-most-businesses/',%20327653485L)#comment-327653485</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;In my opinion Macs are for people with a lot of disposable income who want to look hip when they are using their laptop at Starbucks.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's why your opinion, like the opinion article masquerading as tech info, are, in a word, worthless.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You don't know what you are talking about. Kindly stop talking.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 23:44:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In ten years time, will Apple be the new Microsoft - an abusive monopoly?</title><link>(u'http://technovia.co.uk/2008/06/in-ten-years-ti.html',%20704510L)#comment-704510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No. The reasons should be painfully obvious. One would be at no time would anyone be forced to buy a cell phone, much less an iPhone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:06:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Borg points out that WinMo outsells iPhone</title><link>(u'http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/06/borg-points-out-that-winmo-outsells.html',%20770230L)#comment-770230</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You have a point, but I think the bigger point is this: for all the numbers Microsoft can claim for WinMo, absolutely no one cares. The only place those numbers matter is on internal memos just like the one El Jobso is talking about. They are preaching to the choir, while the tech world quietly does about it's business obsessing about every detail of the iPhone and not giving a tinkers cuss about WinMo.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:16:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is the Internet Bad for Science?</title><link>(u'http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/07/is-the-internet/',%20125510730L)#comment-125510730</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, this is as idiotic as the lead article in the last Wired about the end of theory. Science is self correcting when properly practiced. Plagiarized or improperly conducted research will lead to improperly formed and incorrect conclusions. The internet is no worse for science than the calculator is bad for math.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:41:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Predictions 2009</title><link>(u'http://searchblog.tjs.blendinteractive.com/archives/2009/01/predictions-200-3',%20317458467L)#comment-317458467</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;8. Apple will see a significant reversal of recent fortunes. &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Simply put? Wrong.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Apple doesn't sell sugared water. It has no real competition in the markets it has chosen to enter. And it has earned it's market share on merit as well as a user experience second to none and so tightly integrated as to be considered seamless. As another posted pointed out, if consistent high standards and seamless functionality are "cool" then it's time some other companies focused on being cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:41:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Predictions 2009</title><link>(u'http://beta.searchblog.net/archives/2009/01/predictions-2009.php',%20509178623L)#comment-509178623</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;8. Apple will see a significant reversal of recent fortunes. &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Simply put? Wrong.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Apple doesn't sell sugared water. It has no real competition in the markets it has chosen to enter. And it has earned it's market share on merit as well as a user experience second to none and so tightly integrated as to be considered seamless. As another posted pointed out, if consistent high standards and seamless functionality are "cool" then it's time some other companies focused on being cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:41:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Macworld Already a Bummer, With Or Without Apple</title><link>(u'http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/01/macworld-alread/',%2046068494L)#comment-46068494</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the primary reason the "mainstream" press constantly pisses all over the idea of online journalism: too many of these writers are complete hacks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wired is the new Spin magazine. Instead of getting 2o something assholes to denigrate acts who have have nothing to answer for, we get failed tech support clowns trying to be hip by denigrating the current king of tech.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:28:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You are an idiot if you sell your Apple stock tomorrow</title><link>(u'http://scobleizer.com/2009/01/14/you-are-an-idiot-if-you-sell-your-apple-stock-tomorrow/',%209713854L)#comment-9713854</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's amusing and sad to see the comments about "hype" and "fashion" , as if solid engineeering and a second to none user experience was just a fad. The iPod has not cruched all competitiors because of fashion, or hype: it crushed the competition because it's the best of class media player, has a mature ecosystem supporting it, and Apple has made digital downloads into a viable business.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Apple detractors will always have their whining, they've been whining for 25 years. But now that Apple is back on top, making products that everyone wants, the whining has turned from "don't buy Macs/Apple because nobody uses them" , to "don't buy Macs/Apple because everybody uses them".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When Microsoft asserted it monopoly and abused it to prevent competition, Apple supporters were some kind of freaks and cultists for not abandonding Apple and getting on board with Microsoft. And again, now that Apple is on top of their game, and making products that are the epitome of design and function in their market, we aren't supposed to buy Apple products because, why? Because they are everywhere, and the hapless competition is somehow the underdog?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pathetic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:56:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steve Jobs Probably Won&amp;#8217;t Come Back to Apple</title><link>(u'http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/01/why-jobs-isnt-c/',%2046072092L)#comment-46072092</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just based on the writing and prodigious use of quote whores, my diagnosis is that the writer is an asshole.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:35:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What You Should Expect From Apple Over the Next Few Months</title><link>(u'http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/26/what-you-should-expect-from-apple-over-the-next-few-months/',%2017248762L)#comment-17248762</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; some believe that Apple needs to prove it can release products and&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; sustain growth through the year without a blockbuster Macworld announcement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Those people, quite frankly, are idiots. Apple can generate more press than most companies by not doing *anything*, never mind by issuing postcards at anytime of the year announcing a "Special Event". And as may pundits have already pointed out, the timing of MacWorld was horrific for a companies whose products see huge sales increases in the Holidays. Macworld may need Apple, but Apple does not need Macworld.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:20:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Exclusive Images Reveal McG&amp;#8217;s Terminator Salvation Vision</title><link>(u'http://www.wired.com/underwire/2009/01/terminator-dire/',%20125935782L)#comment-125935782</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Sheesh there are some angry&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; folk out there&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;George Lucas taught us to never get excited for a movie with awesome pre-production stills and good casting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 04:01:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 5 Worst Things About The iPhone</title><link>(u'http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2007/01/top_5_worst_thi/',%2045936848L)#comment-45936848</link><description>&lt;p&gt;God, these comments are awesome, especially the strident arrogant putzes who think no FM radio and sealed batteries are a deal killer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I laugh! I laugh at your nonsense!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:21:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: College+Music+Service+Ruckus.com+Shuts%26nbsp%3BDown</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/06/college-music-service-ruckus-shuts-down/',%2071856678L)#comment-71856678</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Funny, but Ruckus is dead. Unless it's going to reemerge as a mail order site, it's done.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">His Shadow</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:32:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>