<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for dco12</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/dco12/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/dco12/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:08:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://thedailywh.at/post/1423639375</title><link>http://thedailywh.at/post/1423639375#comment-91175324</link><description>&lt;p&gt;... is that a jew bash? are those still happening? huh. it's almost quaint. &lt;br&gt;I mean it's still completely bigoted and appalling, but a bit nostalgic as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dco12</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:08:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://thedailywh.at/post/1366665591</title><link>http://thedailywh.at/post/1366665591#comment-88865453</link><description>&lt;p&gt;buddhism isn't minimizing. it's a dinosaur. buddhism is a deadly, terrible velociraptor that feeds on baby kittens.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dco12</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:30:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://thedw.us/post/357049413</title><link>http://thedw.us/post/357049413#comment-31667866</link><description>&lt;p&gt;fight club-style calvin and hobbes reimagination, or calvin and hobbes-style fight club reimagination?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dco12</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:18:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://thedw.us/post/356599884</title><link>http://thedw.us/post/356599884#comment-31615961</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yeah, tdw, shame on you for linking to a relevant post on a message board without first searching the entire internets for something even remotely like it. ksuts clearly deserves all credit for this ingenious strip, not the other presumably unrelated user who made a clearly superior version of the same joke.&lt;br&gt;oh, and theirs was posted on fark at 2:30. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dco12</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:21:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Daily What</title><link>http://thedw.us/post/271248617#comment-24957054</link><description>&lt;p&gt;crazy ass coincidence though, eh?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dco12</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:18:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Daily What</title><link>http://thedw.us/post/236532843#comment-22174745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wait... if it's a cake sized oreo, then you would have to be smaller, not giant. assuming the human to oreo proportion is constant....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dco12</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:45:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Daily What</title><link>http://thedw.us/post/220948730#comment-20863428</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ARGH!!&lt;br&gt;I can't stand these ads! they're just stupid, petty gibes at microsoft! I haven't had any notable problems with xp OR vista. all the hubbub about vista's malfunctions was essentially created by these goddam commercials.&lt;br&gt;It honestly just comes off as a pretentious douche picking on a mild-mannered geek.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dco12</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:54:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Daily What</title><link>http://thedw.us/post/188183956#comment-16613122</link><description>&lt;p&gt;[reference]&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dco12</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:39:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Daily What</title><link>http://thedw.us/post/188229788#comment-16612549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it's an interesting documentation of meme development.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dco12</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:20:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Daily What</title><link>http://thedw.us/post/185775022#comment-16482182</link><description>&lt;p&gt;that poster was in my doctor's office when I was younger. made me wicked paranoid about candy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dco12</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:54:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Daily What</title><link>http://thedw.us/post/182935978#comment-16208536</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the kidz don't stand a chance&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dco12</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:33:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Daily What</title><link>http://thedw.us/post/173179965#comment-15501774</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I also don't get it. &lt;br&gt;picture = jimi hendrix&lt;br&gt;caption = bob marley&lt;br&gt;title = john marley (who is apparently an actor)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;is it a commentary on the fact that we don't care about the people behind the symbols? like che guevara--the shirts don't sell because of his ideology or achievements, they sell because it's cool to wear a che guevara shirt. so... one might buy a bob marley shirt while getting his picture/name wrong just because it's cool? conviluted, but kinda makes sense.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dco12</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:14:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Daily What</title><link>http://thedw.us/post/172675465#comment-15472453</link><description>&lt;p&gt;^hyper-sensitive overreaction of the week^&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;wow... you assume from one video not only that this is a common occurrence and not a novelty, but that the parent neglects their child. yup. totally sound logic.&lt;br&gt;but hey, just to play devil's advocate, let's imagine for a second that instead of thinking "I'm lazy, and don't want to take care of my baby," this parent thought "a computer rocking a baby would make for an insightful commentary on how technology is living our lives for us." even if it isn't an artistic statement, there's no reason to assume, from such a small cross-section, that you know the whole story.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dco12</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:01:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Daily What</title><link>http://thedw.us/post/157996016#comment-14443352</link><description>&lt;p&gt;it frustrates me to no end when people misuse that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dco12</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:37:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Daily What</title><link>http://thedw.us/post/157305267#comment-14400320</link><description>&lt;p&gt;dude, none of the above are offensive, so long as they are *in context*.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the ad doesn't endorse the views of the KKK, it simply utilizes the image of a member to create a visible tension. the point of the ad is that the jacuzzi is so soothing that it eases even such a palpable tension.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;you clearly don't understand the concept of humor. this ad is a clever joke, replacing physical tension (which is generally not apparent) with ideological and social tension. in this context, any inherent offensiveness is null.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;get a thicker skin.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dco12</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:06:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>