<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for dcadenas</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/dcadenas/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/dcadenas/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:28:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Building Microservices: Inter-Process Communication in a Microservices Architecture</title><link>https://www.nginx.com/blog/building-microservices-inter-process-communication/#comment-2950946358</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Decoupled in the sense that the producer doesn't need to know details of which microservice(s) will consume the message. And the consumer doesn't know details about which microservice(s) produce the message.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Cadenas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:28:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ranking Your University Using PageRank on Wikipedia</title><link>http://blog.argteam.com/coding/university-ranking-wikipedia/#comment-944701034</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice! I just implemented a pagerank library for go and I wonder how would it perform with this. You are welcome to give it a try &lt;a href="https://github.com/dcadenas/pagerank" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://github.com/dcadenas/pagerank"&gt;https://github.com/dcadenas...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Cadenas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:15:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rails 4.0 Sneak Peek: Queueing</title><link>http://reefpoints.dockyard.com/ruby/2012/06/25/rails-4-sneak-peek-queueing.html#comment-913457285</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For testing purposes it would be great to hace procs anyways. You don't need marshalling or async behaviour in those cases.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Cadenas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 22:56:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: solnic.eu</title><link>https://solnic.codes/2011/08/01/making-activerecord-models-thin/#comment-484238213</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the way this approach gets closer to DDD ideas.&lt;br&gt;One thing I'd change is the name of the persistence models to match those of the domain models but prefixed/suffixed with something, like CustomerPersistence or CustomerRepository for example instead of User.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Cadenas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 03:24:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Moving to github pages and Octopress - Daniel Cadenas</title><link>http://dcadenas.github.com/blog/2012/03/16/moving-to-github-pages-and-octopress/#comment-467461224</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yay!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://i3.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/003/619/Untitled-1.jpg" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://i3.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/003/619/Untitled-1.jpg"&gt;http://i3.kym-cdn.com/entri...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Cadenas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:16:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Luis Suarez Makes Ballon d&amp;#8217;Or Shortlist, and Other Wednesday Notes</title><link>http://liverpool.theoffside.com/team-news/luis-suarez-makes-ballon-dor-shortlist-and-other-wednesday-notes.html#comment-354170506</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forlan had a great Copa América. He was close to steal the best player award from Suarez. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Cadenas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:58:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Haruki Zaemon | Don't touch my privates</title><link>http://www.harukizaemon.com/blog/2004/02/06/dont-touch-my-privates/#comment-43322377</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's why I love the method extraction refactoring. It clearly gives hints that a class asks for a bigger class extraction refactoring which can then lead to discovery of a design pattern wanting to see the light (kind of Refactoring to Patterns &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Patterns-Joshua-Kerievsky/dp/0321213351)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Patterns-Joshua-Kerievsky/dp/0321213351)"&gt;http://www.amazon.com/Refac...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Cadenas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 09:19:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Refactoring Complex Domains in Ruby on Rails Notes</title><link>http://quaran.to/blog/2008/11/18/refactoring-complex-domains-in-ruby-on-rails-notes/#comment-19980237</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can also try this state_pattern implementation: &lt;a href="http://github.com/dcadenas/state_pattern" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://github.com/dcadenas/state_pattern"&gt;http://github.com/dcadenas/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Cadenas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:08:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: true or false</title><link>http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/159808704#comment-19979673</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not the solution for this case (as there's not much state dependent behaviour) but here you have a state pattern implementation for ActiveRecord: &lt;a href="http://github.com/dcadenas/active_record_state_pattern" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://github.com/dcadenas/active_record_state_pattern"&gt;http://github.com/dcadenas/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Cadenas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:57:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>