<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for davidporter</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/davidporter/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/davidporter/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 01:59:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Streaming Music App Ecosystem: Where Does Beats Music Rank?</title><link>https://cbinsights.com/research/beats-music-streaming-app-competitors/#comment-1380619526</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi guys, I'd argue a better metric by which to compare music streaming services is audience - which may come from iOS, Android, mobile web or web (or other smaller platforms, like Windows).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I pay close attention to this because 8tracks (the internet radio service I founded) competes in the sector. Here's the sector breakdown per comScore (US audience only): &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/1o4TmWR" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/1o4TmWR"&gt;http://bit.ly/1o4TmWR&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 01:59:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Cavalier Daily :: Thinking outside Pandora’s box</title><link>http://www.cavalierdaily.com/article/2014/03/think-outside-pandoras-box#comment-1301173463</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the coverage of @8tracks, Jacqueline!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:32:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Hipster Music Index</title><link>http://priceonomics.com/the-hipster-music-index/#comment-1275890861</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hilarious.  My 2 fav bands of recent memory (The Field &amp;amp; Fuck Buttons) show up #1 and #5.  And I do live in the Mission :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 19:13:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 8tracks is an awesome (and profitable) music startup you've probably never heard of | VentureBeat | Media | by Tom Cheredar</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2014/02/27/8tracks-is-an-awesome-and-profitable-music-startup-youve-probably-never-heard-of/#comment-1264124178</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks again, Tom.  Really nicely done.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 03:01:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DJ Polar Vortex: A Group Playlist for Ridiculously Cold Weather</title><link>http://evolver.fm/2014/01/07/dj-polar-vortex-a-group-playlist-for-ridiculously-cold-weather/#comment-1190593840</link><description>&lt;p&gt;EVB: 8tracks would be even easier - you can create an account and share a password to make 'em collaborative.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:46:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 8Tracks Comes To Sonos Home Music System</title><link>http://evolver.fm/2013/07/11/8tracks-comes-to-sonos-home-music-system/#comment-959043719</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And thanks for the coverage, Eliot!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:03:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 8Tracks Comes To Sonos Home Music System</title><link>http://evolver.fm/2013/07/11/8tracks-comes-to-sonos-home-music-system/#comment-959042746</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just to clarify: you CAN listen to your own playlists as a DJ, without randomization.  DJs upload their own music from a hard drive and/or pick from SoundCloud, so there's no licensing restrictions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The randomization happens when any listener tunes in a second or subsequent time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:02:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Music Services You May Not Know About—But Should - by Chris McConnell</title><link>http://readwrite.com/2013/07/01/10-music-services-you-may-not-know-about-but-should?awesm=readwr.it_tC8#comment-950597035</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the coverage!  I'm the founder of 8tracks, and we're larger than many of the services you mention at the outset (Rdio, Slacker, MOG and Songza).  However, we've not done much self-promotion as we've been largely bootstrapped since launch in 2008 and only recently (end of 2011) raised $1.2m in seed financing (Index Ventures, Andreessen Horowitz).  Appreciate your helping us spread the word!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 10:39:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReadWrite – 5 Companies That Will Define The Future Of Radio</title><link>http://readwrite.com/2012/12/12/5-companies-that-will-define-the-future-of-radio#comment-734943431</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have to admit, I'm a little surprised you left off 8tracks.  I'm a little biased, of course, but we're definitely at the leading edge of internet radio.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Would love to tell more about the service, if of interest.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:13:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Week In Apps: 8tracks, Wah Wah Pedal, and the Next Lawsuit Waiting to Happen | Billboard.biz</title><link>http://billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/digital-and-mobile/this-week-in-apps-8tracks-wah-wah-pedal-1005135012.story#comment-185207397</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Anthony, thanks for the coverage - much appreciated!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We fall squarely in the "internet radio" bucket. The big differentiator in our approach to internet radio is that programming is created by people (a small subset of our users) rather than an algorithm, as is the case with Pandora and &lt;a href="http://Last.fm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Last.fm"&gt;Last.fm&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Each "mix" has to be at least 8 tracks (though a mix can be as long as DJ wishes).  Also, just for clarity, we don't currently offer any functionality around a personalized, crowdsourced stream, nor can users browse submitted tracks by genre or mode. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:24:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2010 Music Website Heat Map</title><link>http://virtualmusic.tv/2011/2010-music-website-heat-map/#comment-142730641</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That'd be excellent - would love to see the updated version with all of the additions people have noted.  This is the best summary of sector competitors I've seen to date.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I like the Compete design too.  Wish they were a bit closer to the real numbers but, as you say, the larger sites are prob closer to actual.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Would also be interesting to compare with comScore. I'm trying to track these down and would be happy to share with you.  (I'm in process of creating my 'Positioning' slide for investor deck so topical.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:43:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2010 Music Website Heat Map</title><link>http://virtualmusic.tv/2011/2010-music-website-heat-map/#comment-142269848</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, glad you like it.  The 8 limitation is a floor (not a ceiling) tho many mixes are 8 tracks exactly.  We daisy-chain the mixes together for a listener in several ways to form a proper internet radio experience.  Tracks are uploaded by the DJs of those mixes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Whoa, I didn't realize you used visits - I saw that but assumed you meant "visitors" (I didn't realize Compete provided visit count).  Very cool indeed!  Is there any way I could see what that'd look like (even if you don't publish)?  I'd love to be able to show potential investors this visual, including 8tracks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You're right about the latter - I used to compile comparative rankings per Compete on my old WP blog:  &lt;a href="http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/04/06/top-25-music-sites-march-2008/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/04/06/top-25-music-sites-march-2008/"&gt;http://davidporter.wordpres...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Happy to talk through any other points (dp@8tracks.com).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thx R!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 19:51:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2010 Music Website Heat Map</title><link>http://virtualmusic.tv/2011/2010-music-website-heat-map/#comment-141510526</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ryan - this is awesome.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Would love to see our service (8tracks) in the mix next time.  We hit 1.5m uniques (per Google Analytics) in Jan.  (Compete had us at 202k visitors in Dec, for comparison.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 02:16:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://8tracks.tumblr.com/post/1661522290</title><link>http://8tracks.tumblr.com/post/1661522290#comment-104613891</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi P, email me at dp at 8tracks dot com and I'm happy to give a more detailed explanation, if of interest.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 02:13:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://8tracks.tumblr.com/post/1613059239</title><link>http://8tracks.tumblr.com/post/1613059239#comment-104613642</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all - feel free to contact me at dp at 8tracks dot com if you've further questions about the removal of network tracks.  Happy to give more detailed info over email.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 02:11:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://8tracks.tumblr.com/post/1661522290</title><link>http://8tracks.tumblr.com/post/1661522290#comment-102416745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At long last, we've finally a pretty amazing version of the iPhone app now in beta.  I doubt we'll be able to submit before the holidays but it should be wrapped, submitted and (hopefully) accepted in Jan, I reckon.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 03:16:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://8tracks.tumblr.com/post/1661522290</title><link>http://8tracks.tumblr.com/post/1661522290#comment-102416492</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hell yes you do.  Was going to write you this afternoon to thank you once again.  Hugely grateful.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When can we get those beers, anyway?  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 03:15:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://8tracks.tumblr.com/post/1661522290</title><link>http://8tracks.tumblr.com/post/1661522290#comment-102416317</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Koldunas, happy to explain in more detail.  Email me at dp at 8tracks dot com.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 03:14:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Airport Express and Airfoil</title><link>http://avc.com/2010/08/airport-express-and-airfoil/#comment-70694074</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice, Fred.  I've been using this combination for years and love it.  Was just discussing adding a how-to video for Airport Express + Airfoil on the site to encourage listening to 8tracks in the living room.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:45:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://8tracks.tumblr.com/post/937866114</title><link>http://8tracks.tumblr.com/post/937866114#comment-67959577</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice pic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:50:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://8tracks.tumblr.com/post/905988935</title><link>http://8tracks.tumblr.com/post/905988935#comment-67245349</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Leland!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 17:58:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 8TRACKS</title><link>http://www.theobsessiveimagist.com/2010/08/i-just-came-across-website-8tracks.html#comment-66270452</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Katie - thanks for writing about us!  Will tune into your mix.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We don't require a subscription fee (the 14-day trial you mention is only if you want to avoid the site ads).  Also, let us know how we can make the UI better!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;David&lt;br&gt;(8trx founder/CEO)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:27:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://rafer.tumblr.com/post/810214170</title><link>http://rafer.tumblr.com/post/810214170#comment-62597124</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd thought he was making a supply/demand argument, which didn't make sense to me (will re-read, my bad).   Marketers and agencies assigning a lower value to the far larger segment of the ad industry focused on branding (rather than direct response) has some serious implications for traditional media in general, if that is in fact the rationale.  (I'd characterize it as branding vs direct-response rather than social vs non-social, as social is a very small part of the branding side.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 18:09:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://rafer.tumblr.com/post/810214170</title><link>http://rafer.tumblr.com/post/810214170#comment-62321357</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agree vis-a-vis AdWords, for example, but I'd think purchase intent exists largely in search and on certain vertical sites that transact in (or refer to) products rendered in atoms.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Most advertising is focused on branding rather than direct response, as I understand it.  And, relatedly, most attention (online or offline) is invested on content where there is no purchase intent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Perhaps the effective CPM for a brand-focused ad will settle at a level well below that for a direct-response ad?  (Maybe this is even true today, I'm not sure.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 23:40:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://rafer.tumblr.com/post/810214170</title><link>http://rafer.tumblr.com/post/810214170#comment-62196533</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@rafer Wouldn't a less commercially dense property provide a better opportunity for an advertiser (in sense of less competition for visitor's attention)?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or are you saying we're less saleable b/c we're just not accustomed to a bunch of ads on a social net and thus in a less of a "commercial" mode?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidporter</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:41:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>