<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for davidgillespie</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/davidgillespie/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/davidgillespie/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2018 14:16:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Private: Fast &amp; Slow</title><link>https://www.l2inc.com/daily-insights/no-mercy-no-malice/fast-slow#comment-3947381313</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And now I'm crying.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2018 14:16:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The End Of The Level Playing Field</title><link>http://avc.com/2017/02/the-end-of-the-level-playing-field/#comment-3143195429</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It bears repeating - Tim Wu's The Master Switch is the definitive work on this, dating back to the early days of AM radio. A must-read for anyone who wants to understand this better.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 18:20:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New Entertainment Un-Bundlers</title><link>http://avc.com/2016/04/the-new-entertainment-un-bundlers/#comment-2629799501</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Did exactly this yesterday when I was switching between HBO Go and Sling TV to watch the NBA playoffs, via Google Cast. I only plan to have it while the playoffs are on and then cancel, but I imagine they factor in those bumps as nice-to-have incremental revenue from people who don't subscribe to cable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:29:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s Next In Computing</title><link>http://avc.com/2016/02/whats-next-in-computing/#comment-2528835007</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting thought.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's a mobile ad-tech startup called Unlockd (&lt;a href="http://www.unlockd.com/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.unlockd.com/)"&gt;http://www.unlockd.com/)&lt;/a&gt; which is (kind of) trying this out via owning the content a user sees each time they unlock a phone. They just launched with Sprint, jury is out to see whether consumes will actually go for this, but the data behind it may very well wind up being more valuable than whatever CPM ad rate they can negotiate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, as James says, data bartering. Cool idea.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:24:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Basic Income Guarantee</title><link>http://avc.com/2014/07/the-basic-income-guarantee/#comment-1478822647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Welfare in America and welfare in Europe, Canada or Australia are worlds apart. The country would do well to shed its ideological approach to everything and consider systems and approaches beyond its own borders.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 10:48:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do do do</title><link>http://davidgillespie.com/do-do-do/#comment-1246160336</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that is lovely, and you get to be one of the luckiest people alive.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:49:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Games Workshop trademark bullying goes thermonuclear: now they say you can't use "space marine" in science&amp;nbsp;fiction</title><link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/06/games-workshop-trademark-bully.html#comment-790563544</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe it's just me, but my first thought was Starcraft, and then an inter-stellar sea horse (you know...space....and marine...).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:33:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: television- ripe for disruption?</title><link>http://influxinsights.com/2012/entertainment/television-ripe-for-disruption/#comment-548011306</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"While common sense points to all these factors being relevant, the industry itself continues and needs to continue to believe that the network as an institution matters to consumers and that advertising on television is just as effective as it always been."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Are you mad? "No Captain. That wasn't an iceberg and the ship *certainly* isn't sinking. Now, martinis anyone? Our friends in publishing are expecting us."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:17:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;talking about this&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://davidgillespie.com/facebooks-talking-about-this/#comment-538635859</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would be amazed to find a Facebook page that constituted an *actual* community. Very little Facebook engagement actually occurs on a brand's page, most of it comes in an individual's news feed where they comment on or like a post (if they do anything at all).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the vast majority, it is a one-on-one encounter, but for the brand, it happens at scale.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:45:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Turn your tweets into toilet paper with the new startup, Shitter</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2012/03/28/turn-your-tweets-into-toilet-paper-with-the-new-startup-shitter/#comment-478597988</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"When you really think about it, $35 is cheap for a product that’s nearly performance art in its simultaneous embrace and mocking of our social media obsessed world."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ben, could not have summed it up better myself, you nailed it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing it!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;David&lt;br&gt;Founder - Collector's Edition&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:57:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://socialadvocate.tumblr.com/post/18538627575</title><link>http://socialadvocate.tumblr.com/post/18538627575#comment-454498797</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm so predictable!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 09:58:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://socialadvocate.tumblr.com/post/18538627575</title><link>http://socialadvocate.tumblr.com/post/18538627575#comment-453442637</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Hustle is the most important word. EVER!"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhqZ0RU95d4" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhqZ0RU95d4"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watc...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I take 15 minutes out every now and then when I need a kick to watch this talk. Let me know how you fare... =]&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:38:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook pay checks make Wall Street look cheap - 
		The Term Sheet: Fortune's deals blog
		Term Sheet</title><link>http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2012/02/16/facebook-pay-checks-make-wall-street-look-cheap/#comment-444823112</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wall St and capitalism are not the same thing. When Facebook is in danger of bankrupting the Western world, then they can be scrutinised the same way the banks are (or at least should be).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Vandew01 is on point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:32:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Understanding Kickstarter</title><link>http://avc.com/2012/02/understanding-kickstarter/#comment-437086470</link><description>&lt;p&gt;=] A little obtuse, I'll agree.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've been reading a lot of Oliver James (Affluenza) and Alain De Botton (Status Anxiety), which has lead me to the following belief: as we go about bringing new prosperity and wealth into the world, we need to take a long hard look at how we've come to define "wealth" itself. Time spent with the ones we love versus endless dividends paid to shareholders.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The two don't have to be mutually exclusive, but the way we run the world right now skews us much to far to the latter end of that scale, the net result being an infinitesimal and short-lived benefit to a handful of people, one that doesn't actually bring with it long-term happiness.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's a little hippy for a VC blog I know, but for me it is all part of a larger conversation about the things we value, and how we start to shift society as a whole to a more balanced point of view on what constitutes genuine success. Once we create demand among society for that new way of thinking, our institutions will have to follow suit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:39:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Understanding Kickstarter</title><link>http://avc.com/2012/02/understanding-kickstarter/#comment-436898952</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Prior to that, we need to agree on new definitions of prosperity and wealth. What got us here is not going to get us where we need to go.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:51:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Mic: What Are Your Favorite Lyrics?</title><link>http://blog.songtrust.com/open-mic/what-are-your-favorite-lyrics/#comment-433097828</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely - or transported forward in time, depending on the content ;]&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:05:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Mic: What Are Your Favorite Lyrics?</title><link>http://blog.songtrust.com/open-mic/what-are-your-favorite-lyrics/#comment-433083611</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a sucker for Springsteen's "Better Days":&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I got a new set of clothes and a pretty red rose, and a woman I can call my friend&lt;br&gt;These are better days&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:46:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mistakes Are There to be Made</title><link>http://unclutteredwhitespaces.com/2011/11/mistakes-are-there-to-be-made/#comment-427702700</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Claire, and thanks for taking the time to share your own thoughts. I firmly believe with the pace of change these days the people who will be left behind are the ones who can't move until they're absolutely certain; competition being what it is, analysis paralysis just isn't an option any more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is a level of due diligence required for any undertaking, but I think it comes down not to quantity of research, but quality, and asking the right questions gets us to a place where we can make a move faster.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You might like to read Eric Ries' The Lean Start-Up which focuses on this sort of thing - asking the right questions, forming hypotheses and then testing them with changes to your product, service, or even life. I read it just prior to Christmas, and it is one of those books which is never going to be too far out of sight.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Take care, and thanks again!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:36:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Debate: Is Social Peaking?</title><link>http://avc.com/2011/12/sunday-debate-social-is-peaking/#comment-384742450</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Andy!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:49:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Debate: Is Social Peaking?</title><link>http://avc.com/2011/12/sunday-debate-social-is-peaking/#comment-384551338</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you look at Facebook's recent platform changes as far as brands are concerned, you will see them making moves that suggest social saturation. Their recent pushes towards "People are talking about" metrics is the first time they haven't just pushed total number of fans. They're acknowledging that even the world's biggest brands have a ceiling, and if those marketers don't continue to see growth they can put in front of their bosses, they will have to move their money elsewhere. So, now we see "talking about" metrics being the be-all and end-all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for not playing Call of Duty over HTML, this is a problem I'm solving right now. George is in for a surprise.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 00:13:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;talking about this&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://davidgillespie.com/facebooks-talking-about-this/#comment-382637651</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Fabs. It quickly reaches a point where you almost don't mind Zuckerberg being a billionaire, just so, so smart.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(I did say almost)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:00:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;talking about this&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://davidgillespie.com/facebooks-talking-about-this/#comment-382637118</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's a great spot mate, thanks for sharing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:59:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;talking about this&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://davidgillespie.com/facebooks-talking-about-this/#comment-381251156</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True true.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:42:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;talking about this&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://davidgillespie.com/facebooks-talking-about-this/#comment-381250231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Matty. I like to think I have some kind of Samson-type powers going on, except that my insights derive strength from the length of your moustache.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:41:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: confessions of a born-again feminist</title><link>http://wellhellouberblond.tumblr.com/post/12458515703#comment-358041123</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post. Brave post.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And very much needed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gillespie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 20:10:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>