<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for davidcushman</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/davidcushman/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/davidcushman/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 11:07:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: GB linkedin</title><link>https://downdetector.co.uk/status/linkedin#comment-5109952213</link><description>&lt;p&gt;messages down&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 11:07:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Post of the Month - January 2020 - Nominations - Only Dead Fish</title><link>https://www.onlydeadfish.co.uk/only_dead_fish/2020/02/post-of-the-month-january-2020-nominations.html#comment-4782780951</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lazy, I know - but I do want as many folk as possible to know about my post introducing Planet Experience:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://fasterfuture.blogspot.com/2020/01/getting-started-on-your-px.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://fasterfuture.blogspot.com/2020/01/getting-started-on-your-px.html"&gt;http://fasterfuture.blogspo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 03:50:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Charging and reclaiming VAT</title><link>http://www.freeagent.com/central/charging-and-reclaiming-vat/#comment-4752363092</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am doing some freelance work but won't be earning enough from it this year to register for VAT. However, the company I am doing the work for wants me to bill through a VAT registered (third party) company. Happy to do that, but when I then invoice the third party, should I invoice them for the sum minus the VAT (as I assume they will end up having to pay it?)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 12:23:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Positive Social Culture / Open Business / Abundance Mindset and #FoW @jeremyscrivens @kinshipe</title><link>http://www.kinshipenterprise.com/_blog/Blog/post/future-of-work-positive-social-culture-open-business-abundance-mindset/#comment-2130042128</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you are interested in Open Business please take a look at my book The 10 Principles of Open Business, published in January 2014 and available on Amazon&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2015 06:57:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Say hello to the New Facebook Killer &amp;#038; its not Ello</title><link>http://www.jamieburke.co.uk/say-hello-to-the-new-facebook-killer-its-not-ello#comment-1621387918</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Two thoughts:  who is it OK to be remembered by and how? Is privacy the holy grail and if so has does that stack against the reduction in value of 'n' in the 2n power curve if value generation in network science?&lt;br&gt;TBD over beer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 02:10:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Purpose, Vision and Innovation - Only Dead Fish</title><link>http://www.onlydeadfish.co.uk/only_dead_fish/2014/09/purpose-vision-and-innovation.html#comment-1570051910</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Purpose is an essential for flattened hierarchy - it makes organisations more strategy than management led. It's Principle One in the 10 Principles of Open Business ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:56:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best MBAs for Social Business</title><link>http://mc-wordpress-app-01-live.mc.mcon.net/business-education/best-mbas-for-social-business/#comment-1538733968</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These appear to be about social good rather than the proposition espoused by IBM et al re Social Business as a connected enterprise internallly and externally. I'm good with that though because the latter shoud (as we know around here) be called an Open Business ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 05:51:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nassim Nicholas Taleb: How to Thrive in a Randomness, Black Swans, Antifragile Big Data world?</title><link>http://www.intelligenthq.com/book-reviews/how-to-thrive-in-a-randomness-black-swans-big-data-world-part-1/#comment-1538731900</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Read this a couple of years back now. Essentially the bigger and more centralised and robust our organisations appear the more likely - given time - a shock big enough to burst the whole bubble will come along. The author asks us to look at what has stood the test of time and seek clues there. So coffee, wine  good, diet coke, and frosted cereals, bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 05:47:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adland's newest vigilante is calling out mediocre promoted tweets</title><link>http://digiday.com/?p=83061#comment-1530137733</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't give a shiney  one how entertaining or 'engaging' content is, if it doesn't do the job of providing the shortest possible route to a peer's publication of their experience of the truth then it is playing in the wrong place.&lt;br&gt;Social is a truth medium where the relationship you have with the person you hear it from is everything. We don't have relationships of trust with brands. We don't want to hear The Promise, or the Promise brought to life. We want the truth of the promise and the only folk we trust with that are each other.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 10:40:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Business, there&amp;#8217;s light at the end of the tunnel</title><link>http://rogiernoort.com/open-business/#comment-1113884662</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I invite you to consider my forthcoming book: The 10 Principles of Open Business. There are those (Luis Suarez at IBM included) who believe 2014 will be the year of Open Business.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The book is here: &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-10-Principles-Open-Business/dp/1137347031" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-10-Principles-Open-Business/dp/1137347031"&gt;http://www.amazon.co.uk/The...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And some background to it here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.9010group.com/open-business-2/the-10-principles-of-open-business" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.9010group.com/open-business-2/the-10-principles-of-open-business"&gt;http://www.9010group.com/op...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;best dc&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 09:49:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recommending others&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2012/03/recommending-others/#comment-474455777</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Dan &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:52:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2012 brings a pause in the disruption</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2012/01/31/2012-brings-a-pause-in-the-disruption/#comment-426439471</link><description>&lt;p&gt;damned right to get back to the blogging bob! There's no pause to the disruption really (maybe in the flow of tech) because the disruption is more cultural than technical as you know. What I do see is a bit of a 'panic button' approach to tough economic times. People defaulting to tried and tested (even if the test shows it fails they know how it fails) rather than innovating, people wanting simple turn-key solutions instead of taking the big leaps they need. That's understandable. We are in scary times. It's hard to see the other side of that jump is better when all you can see is the void before your eyes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:02:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media&amp;#8217;s Impending Flood of Customer Unlikes and Unfollows</title><link>http://www.briansolis.com/2011/10/social-medias-impending-flood-of-customer-unlikes-and-unfollows/#comment-327202008</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian, the simplicity of it is this: No one forms a group to be marketed to.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 11:22:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can Social Business Be Quantified?</title><link>http://edelmandigital.com.780elwb01.blackmesh.com/2011/09/22/can-social-business-be-quantified/#comment-326186247</link><description>&lt;p&gt;'Million dollar question' is absolutely right. The true measure of the success of a business in opening up to the value on offer from outside itself will be demonstrated in efficiencies, innovation and ultimately growth.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 05:47:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Self-employment &amp;#8211; the first anniversary</title><link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2011/10/self-employment-the-first-anniversary/#comment-326151091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats Dan. 2 years for 90:10 :-) - guess that's why I posted twice :-/&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 03:36:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Self-employment &amp;#8211; the first anniversary</title><link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2011/10/self-employment-the-first-anniversary/#comment-326151017</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats Dan. Just gone 2 years for 90:10 now :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 03:36:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Do The Work&amp;#8217; by Steve Pressfield</title><link>http://thewayoftheweb.net/2011/04/do-the-work-by-steve-pressfield/#comment-192090104</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They sent me the book too. Must get round to reading it&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:34:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digital Mktg / Social Media Bloggers - Mark Kelly - @markkelly333 - PeerIndex</title><link>http://www.peerindex.net/markkelly333/group/digital_mktg_social_media_bloggers#comment-187552742</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for including me&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:41:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: May 2011 Strategic Humor - Harvard Business Review</title><link>http://hbr.org/web/slideshows/cartoon/0511/6-slide#comment-182571176</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So this is Microsoft's answer to the Apple 'wristwatch' is it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:38:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: May 2011 Strategic Humor - Harvard Business Review</title><link>http://hbr.org/web/slideshows/cartoon/0511/6-slide#comment-182570533</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Each grain of sand in the top half of the glass represents a person who is not yet on Facebook&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:36:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Not to Master Social Media!</title><link>http://mediocremum.com/2011/03/21/is-it-british-to-complain-and-not-do-anything-about-it/#comment-169662479</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've read through (almost) all the comments here. I do occasionally run social media training for orgs myself (usually less tactics focused) - and from that perspective I have to say you were somewhat over-promised. To get through all that in a day in any kind of hands-on depth was never going to happen. &lt;br&gt;But what really surprises me is that Thomas Power has failed to engage in this thread.&lt;br&gt;If anyone's case is good, engaging in public should be free from fear.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you get nowhere with your refund I'll be happy to help fill knowledge gaps FOC if you happen to be passing our offices In Holborn. I presented for EConsultancy on Location Based Services (Gowalla etc) in London, Leeds and Manchester at the end of last year, for example.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:45:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Value Chain Disruption In 3 D</title><link>http://www.jonathanmacdonald.com/?p=5077#comment-129981137</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Got to agree with you Jmac. Did you see my take on this in September 10 - &lt;a href="http://fasterfuture.blogspot.com/2010/09/challenge-of-3d-printing-to-role-of.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://fasterfuture.blogspot.com/2010/09/challenge-of-3d-printing-to-role-of.html"&gt;http://fasterfuture.blogspo...&lt;/a&gt; - specifically regarding the impact on the role of the org. You may enjoy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 04:47:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media Marketing 101: In-House Team, Agency or Consultant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/10/26/social-media-marketing-101/#comment-100538214</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To develop a social media strategy you have to first audit the landscape in which you seek to deploy.&lt;br&gt;It's the simple, basic but often missed first step: that's auditing where the relevant conversations are happening and performing network analysis to identify the influencers specific to that niche.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But that's only part of the story. The key thing to understand is that social media strategy should be less about communication and more about co-creation: discovering people who care about the purpose you share, bringing them together, surfacing improvements and new products, and acting together to create outcomes you all care about.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 04:10:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Map of online communities shows world of social networking</title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/8074985/Map-of-online-communities-shows-world-of-social-networking.html#comment-88740511</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The image shown is exceptionally out of date&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 05:15:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.stoweboyd.com/post/1361931777</title><link>http://www.stoweboyd.com/post/1361931777/the-so-called-promoted-trend-is-a-massive#comment-88729323</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter, like so many, is at serious risk of failing to provide a revenue model built on network principles rather than broadcast ones.&lt;br&gt;Simple rule: Relationships are more important than information.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidcushman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 04:17:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>