<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for davetaht</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/davetaht/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/davetaht/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 10:34:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Brizzled: SBT: A Scala-based Simple Build Tool</title><link>http://brizzled.clapper.org/blog/2009/07/19/sbt-a-scalabased-simple-build-tool/#comment-12919696</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I use waf in ardour. It scales far better than scons did.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I still use make for many things, for example, I have a make based mp3 and flac file converter/tagger which parallelizes well (make -j 4 is a nearly linear speedup on a quad core, and interestingly, sorting output files by extension and running the mp3 converter in parallel is much faster than sorting by name and doing the conversions on a single file - in other words, it's program parallel rather than data parallel)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only problem with it is that it is very dependent on the filename syntax not containing any special characters like space or &amp;amp;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My problem with adopting any build or source code management system is the size of the builds I do. They have to handle large numbers of files, parallelize well, and run fast.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davetaht</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 10:34:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>