<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for davebriggs</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/davebriggs/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/davebriggs/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2014 11:27:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: "Content" is here to stay</title><link>http://scripting.com/2014/01/04/content#comment-1188016117</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wonder if there is a difference between content management systems and writing management systems. There might be an argument that outliners such as Fargo are more writing tools than publishing tools, which might make them WMSs rather than CMSs. Scrivener is a WMS, albeit an offline one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2014 11:27:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Public libraries and recent computers</title><link>http://scripting.com/2013/11/03/publicLibrariesAndRecentComputers#comment-1108095403</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Virtualising is surely the answer to this - which I agree is a necessary service - without the need for hundreds of old computers clogging up public buildings.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2013 05:19:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Process</title><link>http://www.paulmiller.org/process/#comment-705762844</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pretty much agree with you there. Process often brings with it bureaucracy and frustration - but only bad process. Can't help but feel that those who want to dispose of processes entirely just aren't that good at crafting them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 03:56:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog launched to defend Southwold High Street</title><link>http://wordblog.co.uk/suffolk/2012/08/17/blog-launched-to-defend-southwold-high-street/#comment-622067401</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting. We're just back from a weekend on the Suffolk coast and Southwold is always one of our favourite places to visit. However we were disappointed to see a Tesco Express and a WH Smith present in the town which weren't there last summer. It certainly made the town feel different, and it was a shame that two independent bookshops have been lost in the last couple of years.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:03:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scripting News: Can we buy your search engine?</title><link>http://scripting.com/stories/2012/01/24/canWeBuyYourSearchEngine.html#comment-419997558</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Can the developers who lead us there get unreasonably rich even if they don't control our future?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The key part of this discussion (and probably a wider one) is in this sentence. This isn't about being a non-profit. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dave, your article makes it clear that folk can get rich enough (and let's be clear, in the case of Google, we mean rich-beyond-any-normal-person's-dreams here) without getting wild and desperate. This isn't about technology, it's about greed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google could have kept doing their stuff, not annoying users too much, and kept making lots of money. Instead they, or the shareholders, want to make even more. That's when the problems start.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:24:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newsquest responds to criticism of its new &amp;#8216;social networking policy&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://michael-taggart.com/2011/08/12/newsquest-responds-to-criticism-of-its-new-social-networking-policy/#comment-284668386</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hope you enjoyed being patronised by Roger! He's clearly well practised.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:53:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should councils be buying Ipads?</title><link>http://blog.lgiu.org.uk/2011/07/should-councils-be-buying-ipads/#comment-263370859</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If the business case works out, then of course they should. The notion that employing innovative technology as an investment to save both time and money is 'bad PR' just goes to show how idiotic the reporting of local government is at times.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 06:22:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The trust paradox</title><link>http://paulclarke.com/honestlyreal/2011/01/the-trust-paradox/#comment-131886142</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, so medium term pain...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:46:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The trust paradox</title><link>http://paulclarke.com/honestlyreal/2011/01/the-trust-paradox/#comment-131779816</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps it is being overly optimistic, but my view is that hopefully after a bit of short term pain around openness, we might all just grow up a bit, accept the odd mistake, not expect (and pretend) that public figures are whiter than white, and just get on with life.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:16:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top tip to improve intranet A-Z index pages (Intranet diary)</title><link>http://intranetdiary.blogspot.com/2010/12/top-tip-to-improve-intranet-z-index.html#comment-117343092</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's interesting Luke, if only because on the outside web, people clearly prefer searching (Google) to directory style (Yahoo!). Or was that just because Yahoo!'s directory was rubbish?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:18:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NetSuite to buy Sage?</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2010/11/04/netsuite-to-buy-sage/#comment-93796626</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks! That's kinda strange isn't it? Surely there's overlap with Business By Design, or are they targeting different markets?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 08:33:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NetSuite to buy Sage?</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2010/11/04/netsuite-to-buy-sage/#comment-93791801</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Dennis. Apologies for the dumb question, but I'm coming to this late - why is Netsuite separate from Oracle?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 08:18:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Joining forces</title><link>http://visceralbusiness.com/joining-forces/#comment-78105716</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wowza! Many congrats to Anne and Steve! A dream team, no mistake about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 07:35:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://ukgovsearch.com/</title><link>http://ukgovsearch.com/#comment-69592083</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Nicolas - thanks for the feedback! Things are getting better, slowly... There are a number of things I'd really like to do with this, but it will mean getting to know the Google Custom Search API. Identifying results is one, and it would be great to be able to rate and annotate results as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:28:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://ukgovsearch.com/</title><link>http://ukgovsearch.com/#comment-69590673</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cheers Andrew - the actual tech is ludicrously simple - just Google Custom Search Engine - but some of the results are frightening. There is an API I think for CSE, and it would be interesting to see what can be achieved. Drop me an email if you have a few minutes to help out with it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:22:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://ukgovsearch.com/</title><link>http://ukgovsearch.com/#comment-69583578</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Paul. It's fair to say that design and usability are things that need working on with this - I'll defo look into that issue!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:49:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://ukgovsearch.com/</title><link>http://ukgovsearch.com/#comment-69580246</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, it shouldn't be doing that any more - maybe give the screen a couple of hard refreshes?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:32:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://ukgovsearch.com/</title><link>http://ukgovsearch.com/#comment-69577730</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Peter - thanks for the feedback. Yes the ads are meant to be there - it's a part of the service from Google. Am fiddling with the colours and presentation and hopefully things are better now!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:21:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scripting News: Scripting News needs a curator or curators</title><link>http://scripting.com/stories/2010/08/06/scriptingNewsNeedsACurator.html#comment-66974373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe something like OpenCalais would fix this problem? It auto-tags content going by what it recognises as proper nouns, I think, which would probably help without the need of a human being tagging everything by hand.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 07:20:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WordPress, Thesis, GPL, and premium themes</title><link>http://www.trishussey.com/2010/07/15/wordpress-thesis-gpl-and-premium-themes/#comment-62410271</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's a shame. My blog was running on thesis, but earlier today I switched to TwentyTen until I find something else to use. It's wasn't so much the GPL issue that bothered me - I knew Thesis wasn't GPL licensed when I bought it - but Pearson's attitude on that interview just really stank and I thought that this was not a man who I would want to give any more money or exposure to.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:47:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Magnificent Seven: my favourite tools for digital engagement</title><link>http://loadofcobblers.com/post/256011539#comment-24074617</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice list! I wonder if we can use this as a starter for the digital engagement toolkit - not a one size fits all solution, but a list of recommended things to consider using when considering a new project or campaign.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Actually - I'm thinking while I type, as usual - it might be better not to list specific tools, but rather activities, such as:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;* Sharing any media created - documents, presentations, videos, photos - on the appropriate services&lt;br&gt;* Email newsletters&lt;br&gt;* Online communities (existing or new)&lt;br&gt;* Commenting on official proposals and other documents&lt;br&gt;* Getting citizens to submit, rate and discuss ideas&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;...and so on. I'm not sure what point I'm making here, let alone whether it's a good one or not. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:07:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Whole page screenshots in Firefox: Pearl Crescent Page Saver</title><link>http://loadofcobblers.com/post/256018484#comment-24074147</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I use screengrab (&lt;a href="http://www.screengrab.org/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.screengrab.org/)"&gt;http://www.screengrab.org/)&lt;/a&gt;, another FF extension that does the same thing, I think. Now, for Mac users, wouldn't it be great if Skitch did this?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davebriggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:00:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>