<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for danvers</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/danvers/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/danvers/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 09:10:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: What the Elgin Marbles row is really about </title><link>https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/what-the-elgin-marbles-row-is-really-about/#comment-6334408647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The point about the Elgin marbles is that they are part of a set of marbles that used to adorn the temple on the Acropolis and are now (mostly) displayed in the Acropolis Museum.  Restoring the integrity of the collection - and displaying them in a museum within touching distance of where they were originally sited, seems like a good thing. The Kohinoor diamond was stolen/traded/looted many times before it came to Britain and so there is not such a strong argument that one place is its "home" (there are multiple claimants).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 09:10:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What the Elgin Marbles row is really about </title><link>https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/what-the-elgin-marbles-row-is-really-about/#comment-6334405322</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Acropolis Museum in Athens is a truly remarkable bit of architecture and a world class museum - of ancient Greek history.  It is true that the British Museum has done a splendid job of preserving the marbles when they would have been at risk of damage over the years, but that argument does not work any longer, and we should recognise that they should be returned to where they came from and stood for 1000s of years before Elgin "borrowed" them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 09:05:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The routine and horrific anti-Semitism in Labour</title><link>https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2019/07/the-routine-and-horrific-anti-semitism-in-labour/#comment-4535537657</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's clear to me that the root of the problem is that there are a lot of people on the fringes on politics (on both sides) who are essentially conspiracy theorists. To understand the mindset, I'd recommend Netflix's "Behind the Curve" on the flat earth community - in essence, a group of people who are a mixture of poorly and self-educated with a passion for finding solutions, and suffering from massive doses of confirmation bias and group-think (within their own group) as well as an inability to change their mind, lest it affects their status within the group.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now, the more interesting question is whether the people at the top of Labour actually agree with the anti-Semites or whether they just don't care about the fact they are all loons, because they are politically useful in other ways (e.g. keeping them in power).  Personally, I think it is a mixture of the two, and potentially incredibly dangerous.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 09:55:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Game of Thrones returns with more whimper than bang</title><link>https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/07/game-of-thrones-returns-with-more-whimper-than-bang/#comment-3424090572</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jon and Sansa are half brother and sister, not cousins.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 05:39:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top tech stats: GDPR, painful commutes and pulling sickies</title><link>http://techcitynews.com/2017/06/03/top-tech-stats-6/#comment-3341758740</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Given GDPR comes into force in May 2018 it is very poor reporting to claim that firms have been fined for not complying with it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 04:26:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How the EU is throttling online business with idiotic VAT reform</title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/internet/11295953/How-the-EU-is-throttling-online-business-with-idiotic-VAT-reform.html#comment-1748888975</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It was agreed in 2006/7 when Labour were in power.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:19:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to lose MailChimp accounts and alienate people.</title><link>http://www.kashflow.com/blog/how-to-lose-mailchimp-accounts-and-alienate-people/#comment-1144207419</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Alternatively, don't use Mailchimp. There are email providers out there who are less, erm, sensitive.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 11:09:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Non Exec (NED) Compensation at a Startup</title><link>http://scottsage.tumblr.com/post/48121091176#comment-865195930</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Scott, the compensation chimes with what I saw when in private practice, but generally the equity % was a bit higher - up to 5% sometimes more in early stage companies, although a high equity option probably equalled less or zero fees. Always struck me as a bit daft for an investor to put money in, sit on the board and then take £10-15k p.a. in fees - why not just build it into the investment deal, as it is horribly tax inefficient, especially when you are generally talking about higher rate income tax payers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:00:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Blonde Biker / One down, eighteen to go</title><link>http://theblondebiker.tumblr.com/post/29886975559#comment-624966549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Keep going and I want to see plenty of updates on here! It's what we've paid for!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:21:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Police incident on Tottenham Court Road - UK news - Blottr</title><link>http://www.blottr.com/london/breaking-news/police-incident-tottenham-court-road#comment-511573704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There seems to be something going on - @hullstephen is live tweeting it&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:42:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Police incident on Tottenham Court Road - UK news - Blottr</title><link>http://www.blottr.com/london/breaking-news/police-incident-tottenham-court-road#comment-511572250</link><description>&lt;p&gt;See; &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="https://twitter.com/#!/hullstephen/status/195835804449390593/photo/1" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://twitter.com/#!/hullstephen/status/195835804449390593/photo/1"&gt;https://twitter.com/#!/hull...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:40:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Optimizing your law firm</title><link>http://founderware.co/start-up/optimizing-your-law-firm/#comment-476299321</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Speaking as a soon-to-be-ex-lawyer, I agree with (and practice/advocate) most of this, although the warranty point (2) is a little more subtle than appreciated here. It is never the case that warranties are all supposed to be "true" simply that they drive disclosure of "stuff" - so the warranty quoted drives disclosure of OSS, which to my mind is something an investor should want to know about (even if the use of OSS is ultimately fine). &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 05:25:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tesco not obliged to honour £50 iPads due to strong small print - ComputerworldUK.com</title><link>http://www.computerworlduk.com/in-depth/it-business/3344736/tesco-does-not-have-honour-50-ipads-due-strong-small-print/#comment-470110834</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@selinasays - I gave the comment to Anh based on my understanding on ecommerce law and the story in general. To be crystal clear, I have personally never done any work for Tesco and do not have any interest in defending them here. If you think I have mis-stated the law, I suggest you take your own advice.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:11:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://danieljmaxwell.tumblr.com/post/14061324387</title><link>http://danieljmaxwell.tumblr.com/post/14061324387#comment-385660424</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Daniel - as a lawyer I would love to see more standardised documents. They would make our lives easier as well. However, if you want to use the analogy with open source code, just because there is open source code, does not mean that you can build software without developers neither does it mean it is always bug free. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:55:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A series of blog posts &amp;ndash; fifty questions you should ask before raising venture capital</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/11/09/a-series-of-blog-posts-fifty-questions-you-should-ask-before-raising-venture-capital/#comment-95814542</link><description>&lt;p&gt;[driver error - comment deleted]&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 05:26:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A series of blog posts &amp;ndash; fifty questions you should ask before raising venture capital</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/11/09/a-series-of-blog-posts-fifty-questions-you-should-ask-before-raising-venture-capital/#comment-95814437</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Nic, we're running a Bootlaw session tonight entitled "Everything you wanted to know about VC Investment but were afraid to ask". We'd love it if you could make it along, although realise it is very short notice. We'll be addressing the things that companies should be aware of when they enter negotiations with VCs in the UK. I'd be delighted to contribute to this project - particularly by turning tonight's talk into a blogpost (which I may do anyway) - or on any other VC/investment/legal related matter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 05:25:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A series of blog posts &amp;ndash; fifty questions you should ask before raising venture capital</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/11/09/a-series-of-blog-posts-fifty-questions-you-should-ask-before-raising-venture-capital/#comment-95814224</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Nic - we're running a Bootlaw session tonight &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 05:22:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Employee Equity: The Liquidation Overhang</title><link>http://avc.com/2010/10/employee-equity-the-liquidation-overhang/#comment-89821937</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting - over here in the UK the good early stage VCs are definitely going to a 1x preference (i.e. money back or share of proceeds - rather than both) but are generally insisting on a low dividend (around 4-6%) which only serves to raise the exit hurdle (or the liquidation overhang, as you call it), to guard against a poor exit after several years eroding the preference.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've also recently written about some of the metrics we've seen in early stage deals in the UK here in case you're interested: &lt;a href="http://bootlaw.com/2010/10/19/bootlaws-start-up-funding-report-october-2010/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bootlaw.com/2010/10/19/bootlaws-start-up-funding-report-october-2010/"&gt;http://bootlaw.com/2010/10/...&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:27:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The London startup scene: Too much funding, boozing and not enough collaboration and execution</title><link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2010/09/23/the-london-startup-scene-too-much-funding-boozing-and-not-enough-collaboration-and-execution/#comment-127456445</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the name check, Pete.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wouldn't say we get nothing out of running Bootlaw - we've built a reputation and met far more people - and many of them are now our clients - than we could hope to meet just by attending other people's events.  However, we are in the business of providing a service to companies so our motivation for networking is slightly different (i.e. it is all about the sales mentioned by Ben).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On the flip side, we set up Bootlaw because we thought there might be a need for an event where useful content (in our case legal help) is given away for free and the networking can be done in a more civilised and relaxed environment than a bar or nightclub (not that I have anything against those which are).  Turns out we were right.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On the whole it is a good thing that the "scene" exists - it is a resource that entrepreneurs can plug into if they want to do so - and if you think events should be organised differently, then it is a free world and you should just get on with it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:27:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vodafone&amp;#8217;s femtocell pricing is wrong</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2010/06/18/vodafones-femtocell-pricing-is-wrong/#comment-57424938</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Or you could move house... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 06:30:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does the iPad need a toddler mode?</title><link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/shanerichmond/100005255/does-the-ipad-need-a-toddler-mode/#comment-56947650</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good idea. My 3 year olds love playing with my iPod touch and my wife's iPhone - although she has to switch off the 3G when they are playing with it in case they call someone (or start downloading apps).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Top apps for them include Animatch, CupCakes, Angry Birds, Balloonimals and a phonics game.  They also love watching Postman Pat on it (made for some very peaceful flights recently).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think the iPad has the potential to be huge in this market - am planning on getting them some second hand wifi versions when the price comes down.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:51:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guest post: Will the new UK government be good to entrepreneurs?</title><link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2010/05/28/guest-post-will-the-new-uk-government-be-good-to-entrepreneurs/#comment-127434505</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Juliana - thank you for your comment. I thought my criticisms of the Labour government were pretty muted. But in terms of guess work, yes, I have said it is just that but have also directly quoted the only meaningful (or official) statement we are likely to get prior to the budget, from the coalition agreement.  We'll soon find out what is happening to CGT, but this was simply an effort to give it more context.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In terms of the government encouraging the private sector,  taking measures to cut the deficit this year and thus restoring investor confidence is a pretty good start.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 08:49:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guest post: Will the new UK government be good to entrepreneurs?</title><link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2010/05/28/guest-post-will-the-new-uk-government-be-good-to-entrepreneurs/#comment-127434497</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi moo - we'll just have to wait and see what happens!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 06:14:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Betaworks Leads $3 Million Series B In Highflyer TweetDeck, New Desktop Goes Live</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/20/tweetdeck-3-million-betaworks/#comment-71177839</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's quite a northern "buzz" as it happens. You would not catch a Londoner saying it like that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 11:52:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should UK based startups vote LibDem? Probably not.</title><link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2010/05/05/should-uk-based-startups-vote-libdem-probably-not/#comment-127428965</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Heh, would your budget stretch that far? ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 17:15:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>