<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for danmil</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/danmil/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/danmil/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:17:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hey, how&amp;#039;s dumbo running a M/R combine?  Uh, well...</title><link>http://dev.lookery.com/post/65220353#comment-5118411</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Klaas, that's *awesome*.  I just took a look at GitHub this morning and saw how much work you'd been doing lately.  Thanks a ton.  And, yes, the newlines are nice to see ;-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seriously, though, the piecewise-combine is a big, big win for us.  Thanks again (and thanks for Dumbo in general, which is lovely stuff).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I look forward to integrating this soon (at which point I'll hopefully be able to submit a patch which allows you to use -reducer aggegrate, which I've found pretty helpful).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danmil</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:17:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Absolute Most Useful Thing I&amp;#039;ve Done At My Job So Far</title><link>http://dev.lookery.com/post/69447828#comment-5114331</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks ;-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd love to open-source it  (and I would strongly suspect Lookery would be fine with that), but it's pretty tightly linked to our overall scheduling-of-jobs system.  Which, I don't know if people want/need that or not.  And which would need a bit more love before it could be used in general .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danmil</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:35:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey, how&amp;#039;s dumbo running a M/R combine?  Uh, well...</title><link>http://dev.lookery.com/post/65220353#comment-4730052</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent point -- there's no particularly good reason that dumbo/poop materialize the entire list.  It doesn't need to sort the entire thing -- just whatever subset its about to combine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for pointing that out -- I hadn't realized that the Java side combines as it goes, so to speak&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Dan M&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danmil</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:01:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey, how&amp;#039;s dumbo running a M/R combine?  Uh, well...</title><link>http://dev.lookery.com/post/65220353#comment-4608385</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Christopher: thanks much for the link.  From a quick look, good stuff.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Dan M&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danmil</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:32:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Erlang, I Love You, Erlang, I Hate You</title><link>http://dev.lookery.com/post/53942297#comment-3481271</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the feedback -- much appreciated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Short answer for now: we're not doing any data analysis in Erlang, and I'd be somewhat surprised if that changes.  Erlang is great for writing the demanding server bits, but Hadoop with Python for the M/R jobs looks like a winner for the data analysis part of the puzzle.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Longer answer: at some point soon-ish I'll try to write up a sketch of how the pieces fit together.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Dan M&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danmil</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 09:16:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>