<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of dagobarbz</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/dagobarbz/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/dagobarbz/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2013 02:44:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Rush Hour Hot Comments On Sarah Palin And Blackberry - The Mix - Portfolio.com</title><link>(u'http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/the-mix/2010/08/02/rush-hour-hot-comments-on-sarah-palin-and-blackberry',%2065821133L)#comment-65821133</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How ironic that Quitter Palin insinuates that Obama lacks courage. Is there a more perfect definition of cowardice than the person who shoots defenseless animals from a helicopter? She is too ignorant and morally crippled to even be aware of her own hypocritical moral deficiencies. It is possible that Sarah Palin is the most disgusting life form crawling on the surface of the earth.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 04:15:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quoting Ayn Rand on Capitol Hill Is a Paul Family Tradition - Politics - The Atlantic Wire</title><link>(u'http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/04/quoting-ayn-rand-capitol-hill-paul-family-tradition/36605/',%20184207512L)#comment-184207512</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ayn Rand was a misogynist. She says this (in her most boring of books - Atlas Shrugged - which if Atlas had to carry that load of crap on his shoulders, he'd shrug and run away) ""The diamond band on the wrist of her naked arm gave her the most feminine of all aspects: the look of being chained."  Sick. Don't quote that crap to me, Mr. Paul. I think Bruno showed us what kind of person Ron Paul is, and "homophobic" sums it up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:49:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quoting Ayn Rand on Capitol Hill Is a Paul Family Tradition - Politics - The Atlantic Wire</title><link>(u'http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/04/quoting-ayn-rand-capitol-hill-paul-family-tradition/36605/',%20184215802L)#comment-184215802</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm. How funny that the most un-American people call themselves patriots. Why do you assume that that a power hungry right-wing family (can you spell "nepotism"?) aren't advocating "taking, compelling, or commanding"? How did they vote on the current budget mess? Did they think that giving $700 billion to the military is more important than supporting Planned Parenthood? At least they have the consolation of being supported by the yes-men like you, willing to label total strangers as "Hitlers" while knowing absolutely nothing about them. Very patriotic of you. I would put you at the top of the list list of exiles - but I would not exile you to Coney Island - I think you sound more suited to Fantasy Island. You've bought the pile of crap being peddled to you by the likes of the Pauls, the Palins, and Glenn (Butthead) Beck. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 01:06:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Warren Buffet: GOP Threatening To 'Blow Your Brains Out' Over Debt Ceiling</title><link>(u'http://front.moveon.org.proxy.piratenpartij.nl/warren-buffet-gop-threatening-to-blow-your-brains-out-over-debt-ceiling-2/',%20251828500L)#comment-251828500</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Repugnant republicans and their Tealiban friends have continually obstructed rational governance. This latest temper tantrum is indicative of their spoiled bratty attitudes. There is a stage in life where you are supposed to understand that greed is one of the deadly vices - and it is certainly not a virtue. These fake christians are nothing more than the bought and paid for sycophants of their corporate puppetmasters. And you, Harry Rathsam, need to take a few classes on debate and argument. Your rhetorical questions are profoundly illogical and reveal the simplistic thinking typical of those who believe "educated" is a pejorative term.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:31:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Koch Brothers Flout Law Getting Richer With Secret Iran Sales</title><link>(u'http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-10-02/koch-brothers-flout-law-getting-richer-with-secret-iran-sales.html',%20326125042L)#comment-326125042</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great article. These sleazy criminals belong in jail with their own personal "bodyguards" named Bubba.I would be happy to boycott every single product produced by these parasitical sociopaths.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 01:59:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Koch Brothers Flout Law Getting Richer With Secret Iran Sales</title><link>(u'http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-10-02/koch-brothers-flout-law-getting-richer-with-secret-iran-sales.html',%20326125813L)#comment-326125813</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You really are a troll, aren't you?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 02:02:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dangerous Minds | Dirty Chairy: Clint Eastwood is a senile old Republican coot</title><link>(u'http://dangerousminds.net/comments/dirty_chairy_clint_eastwood_is_a_senile_old_republican_coot',%20636266333L)#comment-636266333</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is strange. I think we are seeing some of the signs of dementia - where nuances of gray get lost and all becomes black and white.  It is shameful that the Romney crowd took advantage of an old man in this way, and pressured him into a situation he could no longer handle. He should have been protected from this kind of exploitation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 23:19:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Romney Avoids Taxes via Loophole Cutting Mormon Donations</title><link>(u'http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-29/romney-avoids-taxes-via-loophole-cutting-mormon-donations.html',%20700998157L)#comment-700998157</link><description>&lt;p&gt; A donation to a cult like the Morons is not a charitable donation. It is a tax write off for Romney and tax free money to the cult. It is no better than money-laundering. Romney is a crook and a liar and should be thrown in jail.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 12:50:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Romney Avoids Taxes via Loophole Cutting Mormon Donations</title><link>(u'http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-29/romney-avoids-taxes-via-loophole-cutting-mormon-donations.html',%20701000049L)#comment-701000049</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Don't assume that all Americans are tax evaders like Romney. True Americans understand that taxes are a way of improving the quality of life for all of us. While scum-of-the-earth Romney may have done this "legally" it is only because his rich friends have been buying and pocketing politician puppets to bribe to change the laws in their favor. Mature adults understand there is a difference between what is "legal" and what is morally right. Romney is a money grubbing dollar addict and belongs in jail.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 12:52:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Romney Avoids Taxes via Loophole Cutting Mormon Donations</title><link>(u'http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-29/romney-avoids-taxes-via-loophole-cutting-mormon-donations.html',%20701596342L)#comment-701596342</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where are Romney's tax returns? He has hidden his income, hidden his tax burden, and defied those seek the truth. What is he hiding? What kind of person is so fearful of revealing the truth?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 02:55:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why aren't liberals protesting an attack on Syria? - The Week</title><link>(u'http://theweek.com/article/index/248994/why-arent-liberals-protesting-an-attack-on-syria',%201024556978L)#comment-1024556978</link><description>&lt;p&gt;America- the country that has killed more people with chemical weapons than any other country. Remember napalm and Agent Orange?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 13:58:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Donald Trump: Trump University is in no way a fake university - The Week</title><link>(u'http://theweek.com/article/index/248737/donald-trump-trump-university-is-in-no-way-a-fake-university',%201024564383L)#comment-1024564383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Trump has contributed nothing to society , in fact he has helped drag America down to the economic workings of a third world country. His whole "birther" blather showed him to be an immoral liar. He hasn't produced a useful product or come up with a new idea. He is a leech on the system and should go to jail&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 14:07:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is pot now essentially legal in America? - The Week</title><link>(u'http://theweek.com/article/index/248985/is-pot-now-essentially-legal-in-america',%201024567822L)#comment-1024567822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow.  You're worried about tax breaks for married couples? And you're ignoring the giant tax fraud perpetrated by the 1% with the help of the GOTP toadies? If you stop sucking lemons for breakfast, your face won't be all screwed up like that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 14:12:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why taxing the rich won’t help - The Week</title><link>(u'http://theweek.com/article/index/248637/why-taxing-the-rich-wonrsquot-help',%201024579079L)#comment-1024579079</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a toady this Rodgers guy is. Hard to believe there are still people out there boohoohooing over the rich thieves having to pay their fair share of taxes. Sad to see that the Wall Street Journal has turned into just another capitalist tool to push their impoverishing agenda of the 1% onto the rest of America. Envy? No. I don't envy any addict - and that's who Rodgers is defending - money addicts. They are no better than heroin junkies robbing old ladies or alcoholics lying in the gutter choking on their vomit. Like other addicts, money addicts can never get enough. They don't care who they hurt to get more of their junk. As we've seen, money addicts will sell out their own country to get more. Like heroin, more is never enough. It's a pathetic soulless life - only a money addict would think others envy their moral disintegration. Hey TJ, I hope you got a nice little rush from the money you were paid to defend scum.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 14:26:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why aren't liberals protesting an attack on Syria? - The Week</title><link>(u'http://theweek.com/article/index/248994/why-arent-liberals-protesting-an-attack-on-syria',%201024619026L)#comment-1024619026</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And why do snotty columnists think they can dictate what liberals should or should not do?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 15:06:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why aren't liberals protesting an attack on Syria? - The Week</title><link>(u'http://theweek.com/article/index/248994/why-arent-liberals-protesting-an-attack-on-syria',%201026834284L)#comment-1026834284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah yes. The conservative consider themselves "consistent" because they blindly follow the dogma fed to them, and fear stepping off the path laid out for them by their puppetmasters. Liberals don't consider that to be "consistent"; but rather "sheep-like, thoughtless, obedience". This poor columnist is frustrated because liberals leave themselves the option of considering each situation individually and coming to their own conclusions.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 17:06:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why aren't liberals protesting an attack on Syria? - The Week</title><link>(u'http://theweek.com/article/index/248994/why-arent-liberals-protesting-an-attack-on-syria',%201026839557L)#comment-1026839557</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow - considering your spelling skills, your critical thinking skills must be nonexistent. Therefore, why would anyone give a rat's ass what such an idiot "thinks"? And why would such an idiot be moved to place his idiocy out there for everyone to see? Please talk to your counselor about your self-esteem issues. You feel bad about yourself for a very good reason.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 17:12:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why are chemical weapons worse than conventional weapons? - The Week</title><link>(u'http://theweek.com/article/index/249079/why-are-chemical-weapons-worse-than-conventional-weapons',%201030268789L)#comment-1030268789</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The US has killed more people with chemical weapons than anyone else. What do you suppose napalm was? Personally, I'd rather die from nerve gas than to covered in hot sticky goo that  burns your flesh away. And then there was Agent Orange - which is still killing people today - including our own veterans - not to mention the horrid birth defects we caused. I wonder how America would have responded if the other countries had decided that we deserved to be bombed for the war crimes we committed?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 19:58:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does oral sex help prevent female infidelity? - The Week</title><link>(u'http://theweek.com/article/index/246512/does-oral-sex-help-prevent-female-infidelity',%201030293182L)#comment-1030293182</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This does not bode well for Cucinelli's marriage.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 20:11:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why are chemical weapons worse than conventional weapons? - The Week</title><link>(u'http://theweek.com/article/index/249079/why-are-chemical-weapons-worse-than-conventional-weapons',%201030299919L)#comment-1030299919</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They sure did know that napalm was being used in Viet Nam. We saw it on the television every night. And were silent. I guess it's OK when Americans use chemical weapons.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 20:14:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If John Boehner steps down, could Congress actually get something done? - The Week</title><link>(u'http://theweek.com/article/index/249229/if-john-boehner-steps-down-could-congress-actually-get-something-done',%201031625993L)#comment-1031625993</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There shouldn't be any such thing as a career politician. We need term limits in Congress.  Two three-year terms and then you leave and return to your real job. No health insurance benefits, no retirement fund, no special perks. It's supposed to be a service to the country - not a lifetime leeching off the taxpayers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 21:20:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If John Boehner steps down, could Congress actually get something done? - The Week</title><link>(u'http://theweek.com/article/index/249229/if-john-boehner-steps-down-could-congress-actually-get-something-done',%201031626470L)#comment-1031626470</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They lost the election because they had nothing but losers to offer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 21:20:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A brief history of chemical warfare - The Week</title><link>(u'http://theweek.com/article/index/249224/a-brief-history-of-chemical-warfare',%201033517961L)#comment-1033517961</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why is there no mention of the US use of chemical weapons in the Viet Nam war? Doesn't anyone else see the hypocrisy of the US only signing  onto the ban AFTER they murdered hundreds of thousands of Viet Namese using napalm and Agent Orange? How can the US set itself up as a moral and upright nation when we behave like a war criminals?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 13:41:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Republicans Can't Win With Whites Alone</title><link>(u'http://politicalwire.com/archives/2013/09/06/republicans_cant_win_with_whites_alone.html',%201033521273L)#comment-1033521273</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We don't want those racist, religionist, sexist corporate puppy dogs peeing on our government anymore. The GOTP is a dying paradigm - I wish they'd just get on with the hari-kari and leave the field open for someone who actually cares about America and Americans. Good riddance to bad rubbish.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 13:46:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A brief history of chemical warfare - The Week</title><link>(u'http://theweek.com/article/index/249224/a-brief-history-of-chemical-warfare',%201034042994L)#comment-1034042994</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are nuts if you think that those were not chemical weapons. You do understand the word "chemical" and the word "weapon"?  You think that people on fire are a "secondary effect"!  And how do you like that Kool-Aid? And how much of that will you drink before you realize it is killing you? You patsy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chelonia Testudines</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2013 02:44:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>