<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for dad29</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/dad29/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/dad29/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:39:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The End(s) of Marriage Since Vatican II</title><link>https://www.thecatholicthing.org/2015/10/17/the-ends-of-marriage-since-vatican-ii/#comment-2313672319</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes.  IIRC, JPII tied procreative and unitive ends together as inextricable in his Theo of the Body.  Less formally, you can't have one without the other (given right action and intent.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:39:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Creative Minority Report: Dearest Friends And Crazy People</title><link>http://www.creativeminorityreport.com/2015/05/dearest-friends-and-crazy-people.html#comment-2048852922</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, but "formality" requires intent.  I know very few Lut'rans who fully intend to be schismatic or heretical.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do you?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 18:53:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Creative Minority Report: Dearest Friends And Crazy People</title><link>http://www.creativeminorityreport.com/2015/05/dearest-friends-and-crazy-people.html#comment-2047881493</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought that the comment was made in the context of 'martyrdom.'  Are you saying that being martyred for being "Christian"--but not Catholic--doesn't count as martyrdom?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 08:57:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Study That Gun-Rights Activists Keep Citing But Completely Misunderstand</title><link>http://www.captainsjournal.com/2015/01/19/the-study-that-gun-rights-activists-keep-citing-but-completely-misunderstand/#comment-1804195758</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...“what happens to society at the macroscopic level is immaterial.  My &lt;br&gt;rights involve me and my family, and don’t depend on being able to &lt;br&gt;demonstrate that the general health effects in society are not a &lt;br&gt;corollary to or adversely affected by the free exercise of them.  It’s &lt;br&gt;insidious and even dangerous to argue gun rights as a part of crime &lt;br&gt;prevention based on statistics because it presupposes what the social &lt;br&gt;planners to, i.e., that I’m part of the collective.” ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yup.  That's a corollary to the Theory of Subsidiarity (which Establishment Republicans do not understand, nor give a fig about.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:10:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: For the Media, the Climate of Hate is Always on the Right</title><link>http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/for_the_media_the_climate_of_hate_is_always_on_the_right__comments.html#comment-1762086807</link><description>&lt;p&gt;TWO GUNS is "an armory?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Puhleeze.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 14:08:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scott Walker&amp;#8217;s Gay Marriage Evolution: What Explains It?</title><link>http://dailycaller.com/2014/10/15/scott-walkers-gay-marriage-evolution-what-explains-it/#comment-1638776082</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't bet on that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:36:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scott Walker&amp;#8217;s Gay Marriage Evolution: What Explains It?</title><link>http://dailycaller.com/2014/10/15/scott-walkers-gay-marriage-evolution-what-explains-it/#comment-1638775671</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, the wisdom of the youth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That settles it.  We now know that ALL civilizations in ALL of history were and are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:36:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/david-brooks-is-dead-wrong-there-is-no-difference-between-economic-and-traditional-conservatism/article/2508996</title><link>http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/david-brooks-is-dead-wrong-there-is-no-difference-between-economic-and-traditional-conservatism/article/2508996#comment-663123046</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It would be useful to recall the Burke/Kirk conservatism which was very chary of materialism.  Reagan's reference to 'disciplined lives...[under] God' was veiled, but extremely important.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;IOW, "traditional conservatives" including Kirk, deTocqueville, Madison, and Eliot, did not worship at the altar of material goods.  In fact, they argued that materialism combined with pure democracy, would result in the downfall of ANY country.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 08:49:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/federal-agency-says-it-spent-670k-not-3m-5m-on-conference/article/2502071</title><link>http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/federal-agency-says-it-spent-670k-not-3m-5m-on-conference/article/2502071#comment-587081872</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Much, much, much less here than the Congress-critter would want us to believe.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm acquainted with the MEP programs in Wisconsin.  They are very solid, ethical, and honest; and they are fully capable of paying their own way to beneficial conferences, which is what happened here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How do they get that money?  BY EARNING IT.  Small manufacturing businesses PAY the MEP and their providers for the knowledge and services provided.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Given the Congress-critter's geographical location, I'm sure she's willing to 'splain Fed generosity to sugar- and orange-juice folks, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:35:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NFL Networks Gives You 13 Reasons to Hate Time Warner Cable</title><link>http://www.lakeshorelaments.com/?p=12126#comment-430364649</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's not the NFL's ......ahhh.......interest........in MONEY, or anything.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No.  It's Time-Warner's fault. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:29:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Values UPDATE: Santorum Calls On Mitt To Release Tax Returns</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2012/01/16/values/#comment-412962906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nah.  We'll discover that Mitt pays the cap-gains tax, not ordinary income.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Won't look good to Joe Sixpack.  Just like his Bain-ization of some companies won't look good to Joe Sixpack.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Strange election.  Obozo gets most of his money from the Big Banks, just like Romney.  Yet both claim to be 'for the common man.'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So long as that man wears wingtips and quarters in a 10 bedroom/5 bath estate, eh?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:20:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rick Santorum Adds Staff, Offices, Money and Key Endorsement in South Carolina</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2012/01/12/rick-santorum-adds-staff-offices-money-and-key-endorsement-in-south-carolina/#comment-408914840</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Recall that Ron Reagan LOST several primaries before taking the nomination v. GHWB in '80.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:38:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let’s Just Call This What is Was; a Gang Shooting</title><link>http://www.lakeshorelaments.com/?p=11780#comment-405625596</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Aurora doesn't have the money.  Samaritan is draining their checkbook, and their debt-service is still astronomical.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not to mention they're losing their....ahhh......flower on the Oconomowoc adventure.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 18:40:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Say &amp;#8216;Ignoring&amp;#8217;, I Say &amp;#8216;Fomenting&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2012/01/08/you-say-ignoring-i-say-fomenting/#comment-405577250</link><description>&lt;p&gt; &lt;i&gt;anti-Christian bigotry is exceeded only by anti-Semitic bigotry&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Umnnhhhh.....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Horse apiece, I think.  The anti-Catholic stuff is far more sophisticated--thus (usually) less visible and obnoxious.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The anti-Catholic stuff, however, is a two-edged sword; the Southern Baptists, Greek Orthodox, and conservative non-demonimationals are aware that it's not really "Catholicism."  It's "Christianity" as a whole.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 17:53:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Romney Displaying A Barackian Level Of Contempt For The American People</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2012/01/08/romney-displaying-a-barackian-level-of-contempt-for-the-american-people/#comment-405573905</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just the TRAILER to the new (Newt-pal-owned) "LBO Boyzzz Slaughter Grannies" movie is enough to take out Mittster.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If Santorum can capitalize with his populist-manufacturing punch, the "electable" Romney will finally go away.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 17:50:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kodak Readies to File Bankruptcy</title><link>http://www.lakeshorelaments.com/?p=11727#comment-401257897</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The "Vision Thing".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Happy to admit that I don't have it.  Too bad that E-K President(s) couldn't do the same.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:59:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Cordray Imperial Charter</title><link>http://humanevents.com/2012/01/05/the-cordray-imperial-charter/#comment-401139487</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;The media has been content to ignore the Constitutional offense of the &lt;br&gt;Cordray appointment.  If reporters were pressed about why, they might &lt;br&gt;say it’s such a relatively small offense that it’s not worth getting &lt;br&gt;upset about.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sorta like the NDAA, whereby the 4th Amendment was trash-canned?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 07:33:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UPDATE: New Rand Paul Statement Condemns Kentucky Head-Stomping UPDATE: Stomper Tim Profitt Identified, Apologizes, Banned by Paul Campaign</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/10/26/update-new-rand-paul-statement-condemns-kentucky-head-stomping/#comment-90373083</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is reported that Ms. Valle has several arrests on her record for Greenpeace-related vandalism, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:52:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Room Under The Bus For As Many Elites As Required</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/10/20/room-under-the-bus-for-as-many-elites-as-required/#comment-88677131</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Limbaugh laid out the markers very nicely.  In another segment, he absolutely ripped Issa (R-CA) for Issa's typical Congressgobbledygook BS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Even Paul Ryan has been hedging on defunding/repealing ObamaCare.  Maybe he, too, need a slap upside the head.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:19:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Obamacare fallout: Neutering of our HSA's | Washington Examiner</title><link>http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/Examiner-Opinion-Zone/max-borders-More-Obamacare-fallout-Neutering-of-our-HSAs-105304358.html#comment-88499484</link><description>&lt;p&gt;FWIW, Unions absolutely HATED HSA plans, too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:15:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroic Marine Assaults Enemy Stronghold</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/10/19/heroic-marine-assaults-enemy-stronghold/#comment-88331009</link><description>&lt;p&gt;FWIW, it is reported that at the end of their debate, Hoyer turned to Lollar and said "I'm coming after you!"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Forget the vote.  Just go mano-a-mano in a cage.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Quick, cheap, and merciful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:03:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Rich Republican Insiders Help Destroy the Party&amp;#8217;s Grassroots Enthusiasm</title><link>http://theothermccain.com/2010/10/04/how-rich-republican-insiders-help-destroy-the-partys-grassroots-enthusiasm/#comment-84006677</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;that moderates offer the “best chance” for Republicans &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Akin to the GKC remark--in this context, it is NOT that Conservatism has failed, but that it has never been TRIED.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:19:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ann Coulter vs. WND and the right’s new priorities | Washington Examiner</title><link>http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/ann-coulter-vs-wnd-and-the-rights-new-priorities-101217819.html#comment-70437866</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While you prominently mention this:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Several young conservatives I spoke with also drew a sharp distinction between opposition to gay marriage and being ‘anti-gay.’ And many who oppose gay marriage said they would be fine with domestic partnerships or civil unions.”&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;....you then elide the distinction between 'civil unions' and 'gay marriage' later in your piece.  This is a serious error.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the only "polls" which actually count--voting--37 States have forbidden gay "marriage."  At least one of those States (and likely far more) ALSO allow 'civil unions.'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is no "conservative" majority which is pro-gay-marriage.  Period.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the way, if you read Coulter's entire email, you find that Farah does not have the money to pay her for her gig--which may have a lot more to do with Farah's 'firing' her than any "issue" difference.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 07:58:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why on Earth Does She Need This, Right Now Exactly?</title><link>http://www.lakeshorelaments.com/?p=7234#comment-56384842</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;a waste of money to the taxpayers of Wisconsin&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;AND an enhancement of Marian the Librarian's pension payouts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 11:07:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Man Found Dead on Metro</title><link>http://www.lakeshorelaments.com/?p=7012#comment-51253789</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Clancy Brothers.  Probably before your time....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;"The Man Who Never Returned"&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dad29</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 13:29:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>