http://disqus.com/by/cvas/enSat, 09 May 2009 10:04:36 -0000http://www.lacrosseallstars.com/blog/2009/5/4/mcla-selection-sunday-storylines-and-reaction.html#comment-9157096<p>I'm gonna make some predictions of my own before the tourney starts,<br>1st Round Winners:<br>Michigan, Sonoma, Colorado, UMD, Chapman, Simon Fraser, FSU, BYU<br>2nd Round:<br>Michigan over Sonoma, Colorado over UMD, Chapman over Simon Fraser, FSU over BYU <br>Final 4:<br>Michigan over Colorado, Chapman over FSU<br>Title Game:<br>Michigan repeats over Chap</p>cvasSat, 09 May 2009 10:04:36 -0000http://www.lacrosseallstars.com/blog/2009/5/5/mcla-national-tournament-the-reaction-from-titletown.html#comment-9058415<p>Horace, great comparisons to the NCAA tourney.</p>cvasWed, 06 May 2009 11:15:51 -0000http://www.lacrosseallstars.com/blog/2009/5/5/mcla-national-tournament-the-reaction-from-titletown.html#comment-9058347<p>My knowledge of MCLA history only goes back a few years, any reason why SFU is in the league besides the MCLA being 'nice' and letting our Canadian comrades in on the action? Were they a part of the USLIA?</p><p>I'm not trying to knock SFU, I think they're a great team with a great style, I'm just wondering.</p>cvasWed, 06 May 2009 11:13:51 -0000http://www.lacrosseallstars.com/blog/2009/5/5/mcla-national-tournament-the-reaction-from-titletown.html#comment-9058117<p>I agree that conference tournament play reflects how your team would perform at the national tournament. Oregon played a great game in the PNCLL title game, I watched the whole thing and I thought for awhile that the MCLA might have a nightmare on their hands had the ducks won and SFU not been eligible for the tourney.</p><p>With that being said though, I don't think one game should skew a team's season in one direction or another.</p>cvasWed, 06 May 2009 11:07:06 -0000http://www.lacrosseallstars.com/blog/2009/5/5/mcla-national-tournament-the-reaction-from-titletown.html#comment-9053549<p>I agree Dan, Simon Fraser deserves to be in front of CU atleast. UMD is a good team and I think you argue both ways to flip flop a UMD/SFU 4/5 seed.</p><p>Sometimes I wonder why there's even a Canadian team in our league though. Does the NCAA even do that?</p>cvasWed, 06 May 2009 09:22:54 -0000http://www.lacrosseallstars.com/blog/2009/5/5/mcla-national-tournament-the-reaction-from-titletown.html#comment-9053482<p>Just to let everyone know I kept the Oregon bashing to a minimum because I think they're lackluster season, which included a loss to unranked LMU, speaks for itself.</p><p>It's hard to argue that past accomplishments don't factor in to the committee's decision</p>cvasWed, 06 May 2009 09:19:48 -0000http://www.lacrosseallstars.com/blog/2009/4/28/lacrosse-championships-09-from-beantown-to-mile-high.html#comment-8960472<p>I'll be on the ground in Boston for sure.</p><p>Denver too if we (Florida Gators) can lock up an at-large bid tonight. (crosses fingers)</p>cvasSun, 03 May 2009 19:09:49 -0000http://www.lacrosseallstars.com/blog/2009/5/2/an-ea-sports-lacrosse-video-game-is-on-the-horizon.html#comment-8960280<p>It would be real simple for EA to port their Fifa engine over to a lacrosse game, considering it'd be on a similar field/viewpoint. The right stick could easily be used for various fakes, and the buttons could be different shot and pass types.</p><p>Any attempt EA makes has to be better than Blast Lacrosse on PSone.</p>cvasSun, 03 May 2009 18:57:20 -0000http://www.lacrosseallstars.com/blog/2009/4/15/tweet-tweet-the-twitter-explosion.html#comment-8262237<p>Great to be here guys, thanks for the early love, let's hope I can keep it goin</p><p></p>cvasThu, 16 Apr 2009 11:26:26 -0000