<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for cupton</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/cupton/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/cupton/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 14:17:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A Final Nail in the Coffin for Turnitin?</title><link>https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/just-visiting/final-nail-coffin-turnitin#comment-4622856430</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Every year we catch plagiarism. And I think there would be more if students thought they could get away with it. Our problem is large lab classes that change little year to year.&lt;br&gt;So...&lt;br&gt;we built a tool to compare just the files you give it:  &lt;a href="http://www.plagiarism3D.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.plagiarism3D.com"&gt;www.plagiarism3D.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Give it 1000 lab reports from 2019, give it 1000 lab reports from 2018... and it will find common text and present it in a very easy to understand format.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 14:17:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Plagiarism Policing and Profit</title><link>https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/library-babel-fish/plagiarism-policing-and-profit#comment-4370361972</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm... now I'm bitter and twisted because no one really showed interest in our tool to detect plagiarism that doesn't store student's work. Perhaps it would have been easier to sell than give away.&lt;br&gt;plagiarism3D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 19:02:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Complete genome direct RNA sequencing of influenza A virus</title><link>https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/04/12/300384#comment-3857902867</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Abstract: "short highly conserved termi"&lt;br&gt;What's a "termi"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:42:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anti-Turnitin manifesto calls for resistance to some technology in digital age</title><link>https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/06/19/anti-turnitin-manifesto-calls-resistance-some-technology-digital-age#comment-3377008635</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you interested in other tools for plagiarism detection?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:38:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why plagiarism is not necessarily deceitful or deserving of censure (essay)</title><link>https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2017/05/23/why-plagiarism-not-necessarily-deceitful-or-deserving-censure-essay#comment-3326091575</link><description>&lt;p&gt;New software for plagiarism detection:  @plagiarism3D   (Twitter).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 12:45:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mattel introduces new line of anti-vaccine Barbies complete with viruses and bacteria</title><link>http://thesciencepost.com/mattel-introduces-controversial-new-line-anti-vaccine-barbies-complete-viruses-bacteria/#comment-2865800390</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pardon?&lt;br&gt;Excuse me?&lt;br&gt;Speak up!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:26:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Principles of Virology, Fourth Edition</title><link>http://www.virology.ws/2015/07/29/principles-of-virology-fourth-edition/#comment-2294906101</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Paper back versions just landed in my mailbox, very nice  :-)&lt;br&gt;Are the figures available for teaching?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 12:42:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First checked bag fee: why?</title><link>https://blog.westjet.com/why-first-checked-bag-fee/#comment-1590084394</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is that an extra $50 for a Victoria to Vancouver return flight?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:52:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First checked bag fee: why?</title><link>https://blog.westjet.com/why-first-checked-bag-fee/#comment-1590046628</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems like the less frequent fliers are paying for the bags of the frequent fliers. Getting sick of WestJet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:26:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First checked bag fee: why?</title><link>https://blog.westjet.com/why-first-checked-bag-fee/#comment-1590041581</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I rarely use the toilets on a flight. I'm probably due a rebate...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:24:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Virology question of the week: why a segmented viral genome?</title><link>http://www.virology.ws/2014/04/22/virology-question-of-the-week-why-a-segmented-viral-genome/#comment-1351066441</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My answer would be "Why not?"&lt;br&gt;I see +ssRNA, -ssRNA and dsRNA genomes as all part of the same process of RNA replication, just depends which has evolved to be put in the virion. (not quite the segmented genome issue)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:02:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Does 20 Million Look Like?</title><link>http://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/20M-Lives-Saved-by-Vaccines#comment-873546441</link><description>&lt;p&gt;20 million is actually a vast underestimate because it doesn't reflect the fact that smallpox has been erradicated (by a vaccination program).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:59:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TWiV Special: Ignorance with Stuart Firestein</title><link>http://www.twiv.tv/2012/12/29/twiv-special-ignorance-with-stuart-firestein/#comment-792076980</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Science is like following a fractal...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 13:28:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Investigation: Drug Resistance, Chicken And 8 Million UTIs</title><link>http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/07/resistance-chicken-utis/#comment-585863949</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was just flipping the numbers around. I know that's not strictly true. So what happens in different parts of the world? Different "standards of hygiene"? etc etc. So many questions...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:42:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Investigation: Drug Resistance, Chicken And 8 Million UTIs</title><link>http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/07/resistance-chicken-utis/#comment-584705816</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with your comment about the "collapse of mainstream journalism", but I would say "investigative journalism".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;OK, there's a problem if these UTIs are caused by antibiotic resistant bacteria, BUT why do women get infections every 9 yrs???? I doubt that antibiotic resistant bacteria are more likely to cause infection (if that's true, then it's interesting too). &lt;br&gt;Is 1 every 9 years the same for world wide figures? Is it better in some countries/populations? if so why? Has the frequency changed in recent yrs? Is it constant for all ages? What else correlates?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 20:20:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Science Pull the Trigger on Antiviral Drugs&amp;mdash;That Can Blast the Common Cold?</title><link>http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/03/ff_antivirals/#comment-472829130</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone know what this means:  "By spinning the fluid in a centrifuge, he could isolate small clumps of &lt;br&gt;proteins that flew toward the edge as the bigger ones stayed close to &lt;br&gt;the center." &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:52:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Science Pull the Trigger on Antiviral Drugs&amp;mdash;That Can Blast the Common Cold?</title><link>http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/03/ff_antivirals/#comment-472479630</link><description>&lt;p&gt; I agree. It's a fine line. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:10:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Science Pull the Trigger on Antiviral Drugs&amp;mdash;That Can Blast the Common Cold?</title><link>http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/03/ff_antivirals/#comment-472475044</link><description>&lt;p&gt; No, I do understand that it's hard to simplify material and present it in a way that can be digested by non-scientists. But as you point out, I'm not talking about an act of omission - it is a rather an important fact about virus replication.&lt;br&gt;I do agree that most readers won't care or notice, but if I send my students to read it as a review - they may dismiss the rest of the article because of the error. &lt;br&gt;I have several of the author's books (I like them). I expect he'd like to know about such errors.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:06:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Science Pull the Trigger on Antiviral Drugs&amp;mdash;That Can Blast the Common Cold?</title><link>http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/03/ff_antivirals/#comment-472462017</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, actually, the first caption says that models were printed in 3-D, so they are "photos". &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:53:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Science Pull the Trigger on Antiviral Drugs&amp;mdash;That Can Blast the Common Cold?</title><link>http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/03/ff_antivirals/#comment-470723738</link><description>&lt;p&gt; I don't think that's a good representation of the HIV virus. And it's misleading to label it a "photo".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:40:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Science Pull the Trigger on Antiviral Drugs&amp;mdash;That Can Blast the Common Cold?</title><link>http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/03/ff_antivirals/#comment-470710819</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Most RNA viruses DO NOT replicate in the nucleus, neither do the poxviruses. So "All viruses replicate in essentially the same way, and the new &lt;br&gt;generation of antiviral drugs aims to disrupt that process at different &lt;br&gt;points. Here’s how they work.—C.Z." is a very great over simplification.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:28:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Technology for Teachers: Oolone - A Visual Search Engine That I Can Now Recommend</title><link>http://www.freetech4teachers.com/2012/01/oolone-visual-search-engine-that-i-can.html#comment-422519440</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm, I don't like being restricted to viewing 4 images at a time. Maybe there's a way around that.&lt;br&gt;With Google, I can quickly scan 100s of images.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:13:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TWiV 100: TWiV catches a big fish</title><link>http://www.twiv.tv/2010/09/26/twiv-100-twiv-catches-a-big-fish/#comment-135719063</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome.  I remember sitting in a virology lecture as a student and our Prof announced the discovery of mRNA splicing!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:54:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are all virus particles infectious?</title><link>http://www.virology.ws/2011/01/21/are-all-virus-particles-infectious/#comment-132680747</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, for a virus like polio (+sense ssRNA) to generate progeny virus, &lt;br&gt;1) the infecting virus has to release a "competent genome" (full length, no debilitating mutations);&lt;br&gt;2) the genomic RNA has to "connect" with a ribosome and be completely translated - perhaps multiple times; &lt;br&gt;3) the resulting polyprotein has to undergo the correct self-cleavages (is this more efficient in trans rather than cis); &lt;br&gt;4) the replication complex then has to generate a template (-sense ssRNA) before the genome is degraded; &lt;br&gt;5) the replication complex has to then generate new genomic RNA before the template is degraded.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would have guessed that upon initial infection all these steps would have a probability of success considerably lower than 1 due to concentration effects.&lt;br&gt;Transcription and translation of almost 10kb takes quite a while - and this length is about 10 x the average eukaryotic mRNA. I would also expect eukaryotic translation rates have evolved to favor the "average message", perhaps at the expense of error/success rates.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All in all, I think that if single polio genome enters a cell, it has a very low probability of successfully generating progeny virus.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:26:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I bet Moses didn't have as much trouble timetabling lectures as I do</title><link>http://scienceoftheinvisible.blogspot.com/2010/03/i-bet-moses-didnt-have-as-much-trouble.html#comment-41406042</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Phew, I should be able to make it to retirement without having to learn anything new :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cupton</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:03:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>