<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for copyrider</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/copyrider/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/copyrider/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:07:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Ad Aged: Nancy. We hardly knew ye.</title><link>http://adaged.blogspot.com/2017/02/nancy-we-hardly-knew-ye.html#comment-3157260590</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for sharing this with us. She literally looks like your twin which means she must've had a comparably amazing soul much like yours...xo&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">copyrider</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:07:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Birthday bottles: A tale of being born in a bad vintage</title><link>http://content.corkd.com/2010/02/19/birthday-bottles-a-tale-of-being-born-in-a-bad-vintage/#comment-35677033</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bummer you weren't born in '79. If you're around next weekend and would like to try some of MY birth year wines next weekend we're gonna be opening some classic grape juice...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">copyrider</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:04:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Birthday bottles: A tale of being born in a bad vintage</title><link>http://content.corkd.com/2010/02/19/birthday-bottles-a-tale-of-being-born-in-a-bad-vintage/#comment-35677023</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bummer you weren't born in '79. If you're around next weekend and would like to try some of MY birth year wines next weekend we're gonna be opening some classic grape juice...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">copyrider</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:04:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The size of Creative teams</title><link>http://farfaracademy.com/debate/2009/01/the-size-of-creative-teams/#comment-5761363</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's sexiness in being a creative? Think you're confusing sexiness with ego? The model I explained above is based off of how R/GA defines "creative" team.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd keep the writer, add in a streetwear hipster and a musician.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">copyrider</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:39:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The size of Creative teams</title><link>http://farfaracademy.com/debate/2009/01/the-size-of-creative-teams/#comment-5761134</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No way jose. Once you move out of the traditional space, the "creative team" expands drastically. To the writer/AD partnership, add in an information architect, a user interface designer, a flash designer, graphic designer, etc. Maybe even throw in a producer and editor and whatever outside design place you might wanna go with. Oh ya, planners are sometime considered creative too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P.s. I should have come to Toronto to watch the Superbowl with you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">copyrider</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:21:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>