<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ckensek</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/ckensek/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/ckensek/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 23:22:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How to Persuade Anyone of Anything in Ten Seconds</title><link>https://jamesaltucher.com/2014/07/how-to-persuade-anyone-of-anything-in-ten-seconds/#comment-1781424390</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd like the pseudo science stripped out of this. Then I'll look at again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 23:22:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is it OK to Cheat Airlines if it Saves You Money?</title><link>http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-12-31/united-and-orbitz-lawsuit-against-skiplaggedcom-raises-ethical-questions#comment-1766847979</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, United.  Someone wanted to find a less expensive flight to SF. Getting off the plane early rather than going to Seattle solved that problem. You had the option of letting someone (assuming there was someone) on standby for that leg of the flight get on, which would have let you fill that seat (twice) and then free up a seat for the next flight that that person would have been on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 22:42:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Network security spend on steady growth curve - Forrester</title><link>http://www.channelnomics.com/channelnomics-us/news/2388232/network-security-spend-on-steady-growth-curve-forrester#comment-1766826581</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True - I haven't seen the forecasts for the adoption of virtual desktops in awhile.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 22:04:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting Suckered by GoPro Yields 3 Lessons in Value Based Pricing</title><link>http://www.priceintelligently.com/blog/bid/195438/Getting-Suckered-by-GoPro-Yields-3-Lessons-in-Value-Based-Pricing#comment-1757176710</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They do need some better support people in shipping. I put in an order and after several days, discovered that they had not even begun to process it.  I dealt with a surfer dude who sounded as if he been sucked under one two many waves. He couldn't even get my name straight.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 22:23:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Target aftermath: are we safer one year later?</title><link>http://www.channelnomics.com/channelnomics-us/analysis/2387881/target-aftermath-are-we-safer-one-year-later#comment-1755794373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We don't appear to be  much safer. In fact, we're probably more vulnerable as hackers spread their efforts to smaller companies (than the enterprise and into different verticals). Look at all the retail outlets' networks that hackers have broken into.  In a strange irony, Sony is investing in FireEye equipment, which Target wasn't utilizing properly when their network got hacked.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 03:01:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HP signs deal with Trend Micro</title><link>http://www.channelnomics.com/channelnomics-us/news/2387191/hp-signs-deal-with-trend-micro#comment-1749737802</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dateline -  September 2010 HP to buy ArcSight for $1.5 billion &lt;a href="http://www.scmagazine.com/hp-to-buy-arcsight-for-15-billion/article/178809/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.scmagazine.com/hp-to-buy-arcsight-for-15-billion/article/178809/"&gt;http://www.scmagazine.com/h...&lt;/a&gt;  In the article,   "Mike Rothman, president of research firm Securosis, said there are rumors that Symantec, Check Point or Trend Micro could be next"   Trend Micro has "always" been rumored to be in play as a Cisco or HP acquisition candidate. .With the other rumor being that the Trend Micro troika didn't want to relinquish their positions.  craig kensek&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 00:28:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breach, what breach? Indifference to data security among execs</title><link>http://www.channelnomics.com/channelnomics-us/news/2380977/breach-what-breach-indifference-to-data-security-among-execs#comment-1689751443</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This may be true until the data breach involves consumer data, credit card numbers, pins, etc.  Then the major press starts and the class action suits. Hello, Target, among others.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 11:39:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Palo Alto's NSS pay-to-play accusations dead wrong </title><link>http://www.channelnomics.com/channelnomics-us/news/2373624/palo-altos-nss-pay-to-play-accusations-dead-wrong#comment-1620255854</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gotta luv it.  You like a test group when you perform well and question their techniques when you don't. That said, I have been in situations where we felt that they NSS had messed up some of their using our product during testing (yes, we had paid), but they weren't letting us behind the curtain to see what they had done. Perhaps it would be useful if they requested (and they may be doing this) advise from others, on how to best test the products.  This would be outside of asking the vendors themselves, though their input could be useful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 01:44:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Symantec directly targeting EMC's 800-lb gorilla Data Domain</title><link>http://www.channelnomics.com/channelnomics-us/news/2373708/symantec-directly-targeting-emcs-800-lb-gorilla-data-domain#comment-1619473030</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Informative article. It's funny seeing Symantec calling anyone an 800 pound gorilla given their own size in some markets.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 11:35:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome to the new Channelnomics</title><link>http://www.channelnomics.com/channelnomics-us/news/2373366/welcome-to-the-new-channelnomics#comment-1619466846</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A brighter format. However, the more minimalist structure of the previous one made it  much easier to skim. Also, much  of my reading is determined by who is writing the article. I don't see how to do that. Lots of pictures = lots of scrolling = too much time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 11:30:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook goes down: Social network hit by global outage</title><link>http://www.itpro.co.uk/desktop-software/22517/facebook-goes-down-social-network-hit-by-global-outage#comment-1446039087</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Come on  Zuck, and the FB PR department. Man up. What happened?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:12:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why FireEye (FEYE) Stock Is Up Today</title><link>http://www.thestreet.com/story/12713958/1/why-fireeye-feye-stock-is-up-today.html?puc=TSMKTWATCH&amp;cm_ven=TSMKTWATCH#comment-1393574790</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Rick Sherlund mustn't have read NSS Labs Breach Detection Report where FireEye did not receive a "Recommended" rating and finished last on NSS Labs' value map (publicly available).  Both FireEye and AhnLab, the two companies not receiving a recommended rating, published their issues with the test methodology.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 13:26:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Must read: Google uses combination of third party AV &amp;amp; internal scanning solutions</title><link>http://www.cyberwarzone.com/must-read-google-uses-combination-third-party-av-internal-scanning-solutions#comment-1253854490</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's been "known" for awhile that Google partners (in a manner of speaking with AV vendors)  A handful of them put out a press release   awhile ago about working with Google.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:23:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 65% of all email gets opened first on a mobile device -- and that's great news for marketers | VentureBeat | Mobile | by J. O'Dell</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2014/01/22/65-of-all-email-gets-opened-first-on-a-mobile-device-and-thats-great-news-for-marketers/#comment-1231356154</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I mustn't be the norm.  Unless I recognize the sender, I'll almost never open an email on my smartphone.  From a marketing perspective, I would think that  % opened would vary greatly by the vertical market sending it with consumer goods being the highest (retail clothing, etc).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 21:09:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Security Expectations Unrealistic? Target’s Data Breach In Perspective</title><link>http://www.doctrackr.com/blog/bid/371305/Are-Security-Expectations-Unrealistic-Target-s-Data-Breach-In-Perspective#comment-1229625485</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It appears as Target's IT department is/was behind the curve and had inadequate DLP protection and protection against Advanced Persistent Threats and Advanced Malware.  Does this justify these major suits?  Probably not, unless identify thefts start occurring. These people are going to have to be made whole, plus.  Target was way to slow to respond (be transparent) when this incident occurred. They completely failed crisis management 101 and are now making "some" efforts to make amends. I would imagine that any vendors that market solutions for what I mentioned in my first sentence have already called Target. They need to bring some of these in for testing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 19:23:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interview Questions: Hiring Experts Reveal Their Favorites</title><link>http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-01-09/interview-questions-hiring-experts-reveal-their-favorites#comment-1196790020</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to mention a quote from Stanford Business School professor Bob Sutton  -  "Passion is an overrated virtue in organizational life and indifference is an underrated virtue."  What if a person's passion in business disappears? Does he/she discover a new one? And if that's easily done, does that make the person promiscuous in their ability to be passionate about something?  Bad interview question. Unlike.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2014 19:33:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Ghosts of Marketing Past, Present &amp; Future [Infographic]</title><link>http://marketeer.kapost.com/ghosts-of-marketing-past-present-future-infographic/?elq=3a9be65950044969be809abd3d286e7d&amp;elqCampaignId=113#comment-1174734861</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So the future of marketing is to become more invasive? Thin line between personalized experience and being silently invasive.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 11:13:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dividend Strategies of Information Security Companies for Overseas Expansion</title><link>http://www.businesskorea.co.kr/article/2220/security-business-dividend-strategies-information-security-companies-overseas-expansion#comment-1128830498</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The product introduced in the US is   under the name AhnLab Malware Defense System (MDS).-   Craig Kensek AhnLab US&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 19:06:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: </title><link>http://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/hirable_like_me/#comment-997945622</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"It's been done before......"   It's safe. Read some alternative thoughts in "Weird Ideas that Work" by Robert Sutton.  The "No A...hole rule" is a great read.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:17:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Crash of Asiana Flight 214 and the Virtues of Government Oversight</title><link>http://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/blogs/entry/the_crash_of_asiana_flight_214_and_the_virtues_of_government_oversight/#comment-973550401</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ultimately, it will probably be deemed pilot error. It's incredible how the airlines and airports go into damage control on these.  I was in my seat on a plane at SFO, ready to take off, at the time of the crash. . The flight attendants made an announcement that everyone should leave the plane and take their items with her. I commented to the attendant, "the weather is beautiful. This can't be good." She replied, "No". From the windows of the terminal you could see black smoke billowing, but the airport was saying nothing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:15:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Chinese hacking empire: Don’t believe the hype</title><link>http://www.itproportal.com/2013/05/29/the-chinese-hacking-empire-dont-believe-the-hype/#comment-914294945</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A couple of interesting bites  -  "the frustration   the government is having with contractors and sub-contractors   having classified information stolen" and the fact that "determining who is behind a cyber-attack is famously difficult"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the first - the government needs to set strong standards regarding security measures any potential contractor has to have in place to do business with the government.&lt;br&gt;For the second one, where a theft appears to have originated from, means little, given how laptops and servers can be taken over as "bots" from anywhere.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 18:08:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Adding Hacked Site Notifications to Search Results</title><link>http://preview.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2374503,00.asp#comment-114497783</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting,  AVG Technologies offers LinkScanner with its products and as a free download. The same holds true for McAfee and SiteAdvisor.   Webroot purchased PrevX a couple of months ago. PrevX provides somewhat the same kind of protection.  Does this mean "double protection" when using Google for searches? I would imagine that there won't be any noticeable slowdown in surfing. Time will tell who the surfer trusts, if the messages it receives about the site are in conflict.  Also, are Google's ratings "real-time"? Some of the other vendors promote that their's are (even though some mention accessing a database)  craig kensek&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:31:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Home Anti-Virus is Completely Free, as it should be | Latest Security News | GSO -  Network Security Resources</title><link>http://www.governmentsecurity.org/latest-security-news/home-anti-virus-is-completely-free-as-it-should-be.html#comment-44751830</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In a review of AVG Anti-Virus Free Edition 9.0 in October (when that release came out), PC Magazine preferred AVG to Microsoft Security Essentials. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:30:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LAPTOP Magazine - Product reviews, tech news, buying guides, and more</title><link>http://www.laptopmag.com/business/feature/is-free-security-worth-the-risk.aspx#comment-32817734</link><description>&lt;p&gt;  AVG LinkScanner   cannot run on Macs, yet. It's coming shortly.  The current linkscanner solution  is at &lt;a href="http://www.linkscanner.avg.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.linkscanner.avg.com"&gt;www.linkscanner.avg.com&lt;/a&gt; It's free for consumers to use on a home/non business  basis. Currently AVG Anti-Virus Free Edition is licensed for personal/home use. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:30:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There's a Virus Going Around</title><link>http://technology.inc.com/security/articles/200303/25286.html#comment-31821671</link><description>&lt;p&gt;AVG Technologes&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.avg.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.avg.com"&gt;www.avg.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Founded in 1991, with corporate offices in Europe, the US and the UK, AVG is focused on providing home and business computer users with the most comprehensive and proactive protection against computer security threats.More than 110 million active users around the world, Among its offerings are 2 products free for home use. AVG Anti-Virus Free Edition (&lt;a href="http://free.avg.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="free.avg.com"&gt;free.avg.com&lt;/a&gt;)  and AVG LinkScanner (the latter is also available separately free for home use at &lt;a href="http://linkscanner.avg.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="linkscanner.avg.com"&gt;linkscanner.avg.com&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the AVG family of security software products is distributed globally through resellers and through the Web and supports all major operating systems and platforms.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ckensek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:31:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>