<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for citezein</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/citezein/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/citezein/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 10:37:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Meet the Ascender 5 Pocket Pants</title><link>https://shop.bluffworks.com/blogs/journal/meet-the-ascender-5-pocket-pants#comment-4822863572</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd like to see the Stone color from the original Chino become available on the Ascender Chinos. Also maybe a medium brown.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 10:37:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Add Auth0 Authentication to Angular App in an NgRx Project</title><link>https://auth0.com/blog/ngrx-authentication-tutorial/#comment-4713869512</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would love to see an update of this using the new auth0-spa-js library.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 21:47:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 10 April 2018 Update is causing microphone, sound and mouse problems – here are the solutions</title><link>https://mspoweruser.com/windows-10-april-2018-update-is-causing-microphone-sound-and-mouse-problems-here-are-the-solutions/#comment-3882657931</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had mouse problems as well until I updated my Radeon graphics drivers to the latest version 18.4.1. That fixed the problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 10:54:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deploying Azure Functions with Octopus Deploy
</title><link>https://octopus.com/blog/azure-functions#comment-3803528200</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post. I think you brought to light a missing feature in Octopus's Azure support. We should be able to set and update Azure App Settings and Connection String variables as a feature of the Azure Web App deployment step. A simple mapping UI would be all that is needed with the left side being the setting name and the right side being a variable we'd like to assign. This way we wouldn't have to deal with scripts for such a common practice and these variables could be removed from our config files.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:23:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deploying an ASP.NET Core app - Will it Deploy? Episode 1
</title><link>https://octopus.com/blog/will-it-deploy-episode-01#comment-3733448154</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd love to see one of these videos on how to deploy using Azure Functions with .NET Core.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:47:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Respawn vs SQL Server Snapshots</title><link>https://jimmybogard.com/respawn-vs-sql-server-snapshots/#comment-3560416557</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for testing this so thoroughly. I'll give Respawn a try now that I know how much faster it is. Snapshots still seem like a good tool if a DB needs to be configured "just so" before tests though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 08:59:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using map, apply, bind and sequence in practice</title><link>http://fsharpforfunandprofit.com/posts/elevated-world-5/#comment-3558522995</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Any chance you could update this for current F#? We now have a built-in Result type and the following is deprecated: type AsyncResult&amp;lt;'a&amp;gt; = Async&amp;lt;result&amp;lt;'a&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:56:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Respawn 1.0.0 released</title><link>https://jimmybogard.com/p/a14395cd-98ea-435b-a2b4-456ff02e3d92/#comment-3550598488</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'll also add that RestoreTestDatabaseFromSnapshot should be called from the Dispose method of your test class. Or you could probably automate it in the fixture.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 15:03:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Respawn 1.0.0 released</title><link>https://jimmybogard.com/p/a14395cd-98ea-435b-a2b4-456ff02e3d92/#comment-3550539374</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure how multiple-databases would work. While you can create multiple snapshots, there's still just one database at a time (I think). But perhaps you would be able to create and work against multiple ones at once. Let me know what you find out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 14:27:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Respawn 1.0.0 released</title><link>https://jimmybogard.com/p/a14395cd-98ea-435b-a2b4-456ff02e3d92/#comment-3550408015</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's a rough outlined version I threw together for you: &lt;a href="https://gist.github.com/BrianVallelunga/83b13a9636e96c5ebff477fb5444482c" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://gist.github.com/BrianVallelunga/83b13a9636e96c5ebff477fb5444482c"&gt;https://gist.github.com/Bri...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The way we use this is once per suite of tests, so maybe it is not quite the same as what you're using, but it could certainly be adapted to work per-test or per class of tests.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 13:10:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Respawn 1.0.0 released</title><link>https://jimmybogard.com/p/a14395cd-98ea-435b-a2b4-456ff02e3d92/#comment-3550313101</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Did you consider just using SQL Server snapshots? I've been very happy with their performance. This was easy enough to integrate into xUnit with a Fixture. I'd be interested in benchmarking snapshots versus your table-purging solution.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 12:14:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fujifilm Deals Coming Next Week in Europe</title><link>http://www.fujirumors.com/fujifilm-deals-coming-next-week-europe/#comment-3312385359</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Any word on US deals? I'm interested in a lens or two.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 09:50:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Allen Premium 2</title><link>https://www.twowheelingtots.com/allen-ast200/#comment-3138271474</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My son has had this bike for 2.5 years and it has been wonderful for him. At 5 he was able to ride 24 miles during one day trip, which I attribute to the bike's light weight and smooth operation. The belt drive has required zero maintenance as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We did swap out the pedals on this bike for slightly larger ones. We found the included pedals a bit too small and they didn't provide enough traction.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm now in the market for a 20" bike for my son (who's about to turn 6) and my daughter will be inheriting the 16" Belter. Is there a chance you can review the 20" model? I'm debating between that, the Woom 4, and the Islabikes Beinns.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2017 23:37:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Try it and I'll kill you - You've Been Haacked</title><link>http://haacked.com/archive/2016/01/01/try-it-and-ill-kill-you/#comment-2437419692</link><description>&lt;p&gt;On the advice of the internet, we started saying "Asked and Answered" to my four year-old when he repeatedly asks questions we've answered already. He understands that when we say that the conversation is over. It's worked surprisingly well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2016 09:07:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Azure DocumentDB bids fond farewell to Self-Links</title><link>https://azure.microsoft.com/blog/2015/08/13/azure-documentdb-bids-fond-farewell-to-self-links/#comment-2193664851</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Will we be able to load a document via this same method?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 08:36:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CQRS with MediatR and AutoMapper</title><link>https://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2015/05/05/cqrs-with-mediatr-and-automapper/#comment-2014455372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I built something internally almost identical to MediatR and have been trying to figure out how best to use it. I ended up with a lot of objects and handlers, with handlers that in turn call the mediator and use other handlers. The separation of code was nice, but I think it comes with a loss of cohesion as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It seems like the more you head towards this model the more you might as well go to a fully functional approach.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What I'd like to see is an example involving nested MediatR calls and external services that need to percolate errors back to the UI.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 19:52:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Troy Hunt: Automating web hosting creation in Azure with PowerShell</title><link>https://www.troyhunt.com/automating-web-hosting-creation-in/#comment-1818637884</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I spent a good deal of time writing a very similar script last week. One thing you can do is use the New-AzureResource to create the website with the desired hosting plan immediately. Otherwise it ends up creating a default hosting plan that you don't need and just have to clean up later.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:07:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GitHub Flow Like a Pro with these 13 Git Aliases</title><link>http://haacked.com/archive/2014/07/28/github-flow-aliases/#comment-1511116580</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, thanks for the clarification. The save/undo works well on a single machine, but I'm constantly moving between my laptop and desktop. I'm not sure of a great solution to that problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 20:07:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GitHub Flow Like a Pro with these 13 Git Aliases</title><link>http://haacked.com/archive/2014/07/28/github-flow-aliases/#comment-1509850044</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When you merge a pull request from a topic branch, do you squash your branch's commits down, or just leave the entire history there? If so, wouldn't you end up with a lot of SAVEPOINT commits on master?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Similarly, after you merge into master, delete your branch and push, is it up to all other developers that collaborated with you on that topic branch to clean up their own copies? Their topic branches don't get automatically closed on the next pull, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 08:36:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FREE X-T1 with Ting.com (via Fujirumors). Here is how you can win it:</title><link>http://www.fujirumors.com/free-x-t1-with-ting-com-via-fujirumors-here-is-how-you-can-win-it/#comment-1275123860</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You would save $1612.80 in 2 years by switching to Ting for mobile!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 10:49:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unit Testing Improvements in ASP.NET Web API</title><link>http://cibrax.me/blog/2013/09/27/unit-testing-improvements-in-asp-dot-net-web-api/#comment-1068687213</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So CreatedAtRouteNegotiatedContentResult should be the new standard return type? Or should we simply be defining the methods as returning IHttpActionResult? CreatedAtRouteNegotiatedContentResult is a really terrible name for something that seems like it would be used in every method that needed testing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 10:12:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chaining Azure Web.Config Transforms When Deploying From Source Control</title><link>http://brian.vallelunga.com/blog/chaining-azure-web-config-transforms-when-deploying-from-source-control#comment-961900531</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As far as I know, this only works with Azure Web Sites, not Azure Web Services. With an Azure Web Site, there are no cscfg files.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2013 12:50:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chaining Azure Web.Config Transforms When Deploying From Source Control</title><link>http://brian.vallelunga.com/blog/chaining-azure-web-config-transforms-when-deploying-from-source-control#comment-955561182</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Following up, just having this in my .deployment file doesn't work:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[config]&lt;br&gt;SCM_BUILD_ARGS = /p:Environment=%ENVIRONMENT%&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;%ENVIRONMENT% isn't treated as a token to be replaced by the app settings, it's treated as a literal value. This ends in an error saying the transform Web.%ENVIRONMENT%.config could not be found.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since I have multiple Azure Web Site "environments" the .deployment file really isn't going to work as it is common to all builds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The app settings version works fantastically though. I'll update the post to reflect the change.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 15:26:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chaining Azure Web.Config Transforms When Deploying From Source Control</title><link>http://brian.vallelunga.com/blog/chaining-azure-web-config-transforms-when-deploying-from-source-control#comment-955523419</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the tip. I'll try it out and update the post. This certainly removes the biggest hurdle to getting this working.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 14:48:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alt.Tekpub: Consuming The API</title><link>http://wekeroad.com/2012/03/18/alt-tekpub-consuming-the-api/#comment-469660406</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have you considered the negative impact of writing TekPub as a single page application from a content discoverability standpoint? You'd lose so much in SEO that it doesn't seem worth it to me. Google won't call your API!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now, that said, I could see the usefulness in having a SPA once you're logged in to TekPub and want to watch videos or manage your account. That would be slick. But for what's on the home page and preview pages -- what's the point?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Vallelunga</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:00:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>