<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for cino24</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/cino24/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/cino24/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 17:06:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Two 12-year-old girls allegedly stab friend 19 times because of creepy Internet meme</title><link>/2014/06/03/two-12-year-old-girls-allegedly-stab-friend-19-times-because-of-creepy-internet-meme/#comment-1418244420</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually walkintruth's comment was very relevant to this article.  It was respectful and informative.   You seem like a troll&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cino24</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 17:06:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two 12-year-old girls allegedly stab friend 19 times because of creepy Internet meme</title><link>/2014/06/03/two-12-year-old-girls-allegedly-stab-friend-19-times-because-of-creepy-internet-meme/#comment-1418223663</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There are spiritual laws that he is speaking of.  Educate yourself on spiritual warfare before you dismiss. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cino24</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:52:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The idjit who cried dog whistle: Clueless Marc Lamont Hill smears Sarah Palin; Gets schooled</title><link>http://twitchy.com/%custom_author%/2013/11/11/the-idjit-who-cried-dog-whistle-clueless-marc-lamont-hill-smears-sarah-palin-gets-schooled/#comment-1118711522</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Huff Post deactivated my account.  I was always respectful, just posted my conservative views.  I contacted them about it and they never acknowledged me or gave me a reason.  Huff Post is a joke.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cino24</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:00:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TRANSCRIPT: First Lady Michelle Obama&amp;#8217;s DNC Speech</title><link>http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/09/04/transcript-first-lady-michelle-obamas-dnc-speech/#comment-640584435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LBTC:  You've just been schooled.  Keep asking questions that do not contribute anything informative to the argument you started with Bruce D.  We get your M.O.  Arguing for argument's sake... you're not objective enough to see valid points when they are spoon fed to you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cino24</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:15:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TRANSCRIPT: First Lady Michelle Obama&amp;#8217;s DNC Speech</title><link>http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/09/04/transcript-first-lady-michelle-obamas-dnc-speech/#comment-640568115</link><description>&lt;p&gt;everyone has a right to express their opinion just like you have the right to troll every single comment a conservative makes.  You are so obsessed with arguing for arguing's sake you will be combative over things you yourself label dribble.  If it's not worth your time, why did you respond 4 times in my thread?  You can't help it... I know.  Some people were put on this earth to argue everything but never learn anything.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cino24</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 11:55:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TRANSCRIPT: First Lady Michelle Obama&amp;#8217;s DNC Speech</title><link>http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/09/04/transcript-first-lady-michelle-obamas-dnc-speech/#comment-640106956</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;yes, AMONG&lt;br&gt;OTHER THINGS being the first lady means you should put some thought into what&lt;br&gt;you wear. She is seen as a representation of the women of this nation (ie FIRST&lt;br&gt;LADY) therefore a sense of formality or stateliness is necessary and&lt;br&gt;appropriate. I'm not the first to notice her lack of discretion in her attire&lt;br&gt;people.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cino24</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 02:04:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TRANSCRIPT: First Lady Michelle Obama&amp;#8217;s DNC Speech</title><link>http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/09/04/transcript-first-lady-michelle-obamas-dnc-speech/#comment-640101677</link><description>&lt;p&gt;dude, you have anger issues.  calm down and take a deep breath.  I did make a point... I'm sick of seeing her armpits.  That is a point.  Maybe a point that "wasted your time" but wouldn't your lengthy response to my pointless babble also invade upon your precious time resraint?? ;)  But go ahead and talk about me tomorrow... make a harmless internet commment consume more of your valuable time.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cino24</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 02:01:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TRANSCRIPT: First Lady Michelle Obama&amp;#8217;s DNC Speech</title><link>http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/09/04/transcript-first-lady-michelle-obamas-dnc-speech/#comment-640092593</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's not the ONLY thing I'm worried about but like I said... I'm so sick of seeing that woman's armpits!!  She has NO sense of formality or stateliness.  Doesn't mean I don't care about more weighty issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cino24</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 01:54:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TRANSCRIPT: First Lady Michelle Obama&amp;#8217;s DNC Speech</title><link>http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/09/04/transcript-first-lady-michelle-obamas-dnc-speech/#comment-640037595</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm so sick&lt;br&gt;of seeing that woman's armpits!! She has NO concept of how to respect the&lt;br&gt;position she's in. Her choice of clothing is just the most obvious indication&lt;br&gt;is she's clueless. 90% of the time her attire is entirely inappropriate for the&lt;br&gt;occasion. She has no sense of formality or stateliness.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cino24</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:20:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adam's Thingy</title><link>http://adamczar.tumblr.com/post/37282270#comment-637662</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pardon my inaccuracy.  However, my point is made regardless of if he said "people" "men" or "his children".  The fact remains (and my point was) that his "dream" was that we would be judged by character not skin color.  Geez.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cino24</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:50:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adam's Thingy</title><link>http://adamczar.tumblr.com/post/37282270#comment-637278</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Megan,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;MLK Jr. said “you should judge the man not by the color of his skin but on the content of his character”.  You don’t hear anybody screaming “you should not judge!” at him do you?  Why?  Because everyone knows that he means it in an evaluative sense not an authoritative sense.  Our civic duty as citizens of this great nation is to EVALUATE the candidates and vote for the best based on an educated decision.  Apparently, according to you, that shouldn’t be allowed.  Sorry if our democracy sickens you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cino24</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:58:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adam's Thingy</title><link>http://adamczar.tumblr.com/post/37282270#comment-632682</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Megan,&lt;br&gt;To recognize that a self proclaimed Christian is speaking or acting in a way that is contradictory to the Word is NOT judging.  The Bible teaches Christians to hold themselves accountable to one another.  This cliché "judging" topic is misused and not at all what those who oppose Obama's views are doing. &lt;br&gt;The Word says:&lt;br&gt;By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For Christians to compare a persons actions against the Word so as to determine if they are wolves in sheep’s clothing or true followers of Christ is not judging, it's Biblical.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cino24</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:10:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adam's Thingy</title><link>http://adamczar.tumblr.com/post/37282270#comment-632575</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jason, you have proven yourself to be intelligent &amp;amp; respectful while debating over a very controversial topic.  It's refreshing to see that.  You make valid points and challenge others to think with some common sense &amp;amp; logic.   The idea of promoting, hiring, or electing based on merit rather than skin color still eludes so many people.&lt;br&gt;Regardless of how "personal" people want to make religion, God did not call us to "keep our faith to ourselves" but rather the opposite.  I can't understand why some don't want to know or don't care to know where their leaders stand spiritually.  It has everything to do with their ethics and value system which Christians take very seriously.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cino24</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:56:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>