<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for cindyhotpoint</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/cindyhotpoint/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/cindyhotpoint/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:52:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: New (Old) Name and Logo for Tribune Publishing</title><link>https://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/new_old_name_and_logo_for_tribune_publishing.php#comment-4157600738</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not to mention the blue is just a few steps away from competitor Gannett (&lt;a href="https://www.gannett.com/brands/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.gannett.com/brands/)"&gt;https://www.gannett.com/bra...&lt;/a&gt; -- but then again, practically everyone uses that color, right? I just had to reset my disqus password to leave this comment, and their site was drenched in that blue as well. *yawn*&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:52:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Logo for TodayTix</title><link>https://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/new_logo_for_todaytix.php#comment-3331777576</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I also found the new app icon irritating. Perhaps if I'd seen their rebrand campaign (which, even though I live in NYC, I didn't), it would perhaps resonate with me. To be fair, they did send an (overly-long) email about it that was buried in my promotions tag, but I'm not sure that's enough.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 12:02:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Logo and Packaging for Carmex by Anthem</title><link>https://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/new_logo_and_packaging_for_carmex_by_anthem.php#comment-3238306498</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My husband, a UK expat, is a hardcore Carmex user -- and I actually thought this rebrand was just how the product looked in the UK. Took me a month or so to realize he was using the US version.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 17:19:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.therichgirlsareweeping.com/post/28630307308</title><link>http://www.therichgirlsareweeping.com/post/28630307308#comment-614242591</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Sean! No pressure, right?!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 02:26:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Exist Yesterday.</title><link>http://jonathanbogart.tumblr.com/post/27263383403#comment-588996653</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Expansive gesture!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:38:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alamo Drafthouse Goes to New York! : Blog : Austin : Alamo Drafthouse Cinema</title><link>http://drafthouse.com/blog/entry/alamo_drafthouse_goes_to_new_york#comment-487977948</link><description>&lt;p&gt;THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 22:25:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://jonathanbogart.tumblr.com/post/18861450741</title><link>http://jonathanbogart.tumblr.com/post/18861450741#comment-458154366</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Which is why, during my entire tenure on Tumblr, I have never done this. Ever. Because I am too delicate to deal with a) a potential lack of questions or b) the potential for terrible anonymous questions. (Because I'm not the kind of person who turns off anonymous questions.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:27:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://jonathanbogart.tumblr.com/post/18749469927</title><link>http://jonathanbogart.tumblr.com/post/18749469927#comment-457913979</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am now!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:53:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://jonathanbogart.tumblr.com/post/18622756008</title><link>http://jonathanbogart.tumblr.com/post/18622756008#comment-455114061</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:07:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://jonathanbogart.tumblr.com/post/18094849048</title><link>http://jonathanbogart.tumblr.com/post/18094849048#comment-447064447</link><description>&lt;p&gt;... just wait until everyone gets used to your new sartorial look, and then the day you dress down just the slightest bit, they'll ask if you're feeling okay, and if something is wrong!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As someone who, as my co-workers semi-disdainfully noted in a conversation recently, "has an outfit for everything", I feel you on this one, and never get much sympathy when I voice similar complaints. (Context: they admitted to working out, sleeping and working from home in the same clothes -- whilst I have three discreete sets of clothing for each activity. This apparently makes me strange. I maintain it just means I have *boundaries*, but I digress.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:21:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://jonathanbogart.tumblr.com/post/17161221810</title><link>http://jonathanbogart.tumblr.com/post/17161221810#comment-443855521</link><description>&lt;p&gt;... and to think a 'dry spell' of a month (January) had me panicking that I was never going to read fiction again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 01:29:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.therichgirlsareweeping.com/post/16824955901</title><link>http://www.therichgirlsareweeping.com/post/16824955901#comment-425685769</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I know. That's partially why I don't have much else to say here. I have a completely different reaction to Lana Del Rey that's logically incogruent with Katherine's argument. It's a bit more nuanced. Lana Del Rey is troubling; this is a good thing. Lana Del Rey is a provocative character. Also a good thing. But I'm not sure anyone's really in a place to listen to what I have to say on this subject -- and, more to the point, I'm not sure I'm ready to write about it yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:09:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.therichgirlsareweeping.com/post/16824955901</title><link>http://www.therichgirlsareweeping.com/post/16824955901#comment-425683642</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I do like all three! Austra not as much as Grimes or TNP, but still -- all more than Zola Jesus. Seriously, i can hear the polyps forming on her vocal cords whenever I listen to her stuff. I'm not kidding, I pretty much find her voice aesthetically revolting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:06:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://jonathanbogart.tumblr.com/post/16615423087</title><link>http://jonathanbogart.tumblr.com/post/16615423087#comment-425004378</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, I've had this idea off and on a few times. We should do it. I'm not kidding.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:47:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.therichgirlsareweeping.com/post/13981674188</title><link>http://www.therichgirlsareweeping.com/post/13981674188#comment-383127787</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is remarkable -- unless the frames are transposed?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:30:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://jonathanbogart.tumblr.com/post/12479480611</title><link>http://jonathanbogart.tumblr.com/post/12479480611#comment-358773053</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This sounds about right, actually. You are quite good at getting to the quintessence of things.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 18:22:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.therichgirlsareweeping.com/post/12162549536</title><link>http://www.therichgirlsareweeping.com/post/12162549536#comment-352256120</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is frustrating, isn't it, to see rants/posts like this? I guess that's why Kelly took hers down. You're right, no one person can be held accountable for people's fiscal irresponsibility. And I also don't feel like Man Repeller in particular is one of the bloggers who's egregiously spendy at all. But consumerism is at the root of ALL fashion blogging, and unless you're going to live off the grid and make all your own clothes and not engage in consumer culture, I'm not sure you can go around pointing fingers at someone just because you get a bee in your bonnet about one of their posts, or that they're 23 and have things you don't -- namely, some terribly expensive and probably rather uncomfortable shoes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:55:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.therichgirlsareweeping.com/post/12168748164</title><link>http://www.therichgirlsareweeping.com/post/12168748164#comment-352253130</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeeeeah. I'm not surprised at this, but still.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hey, can I be honest with you? You're not more fun when you drink. AND NEITHER AM I.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I doubt Florence is either.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:49:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://jonathanbogart.tumblr.com/post/11731649779</title><link>http://jonathanbogart.tumblr.com/post/11731649779#comment-340760220</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This song really is the most brilliant thing I've heard in eons. OMFG.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(I shrieked on that last rhyme. WOW.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:42:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.therichgirlsareweeping.com/post/11654548168</title><link>http://www.therichgirlsareweeping.com/post/11654548168#comment-339232335</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, I think you're right. There was some Roxy and Japan in there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think it was Eno -&amp;gt; Roxy -&amp;gt; Japan -&amp;gt; Duran Duran -&amp;gt; Juicy Couture&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:29:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://marathonpacks.tumblr.com/post/11142795001</title><link>http://marathonpacks.tumblr.com/post/11142795001#comment-329111643</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wait, what? I mean, I don't even like Radiohead, but at least I can describe what they sound like more accurately than this. Sheesh.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:35:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://pgwp.tumblr.com/post/10815064995</title><link>http://pgwp.tumblr.com/post/10815064995#comment-323274560</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lovely! Congrats on your anniversary! xoxo&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:26:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.therichgirlsareweeping.com/post/10207365386</title><link>http://www.therichgirlsareweeping.com/post/10207365386#comment-311833116</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the feedback, Evie! There's lots of reasons we don't keep up the old version of this blog anymore -- it's a long story. I like Tumblr though, and I don't have any plans to change the format in the short term.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you're looking for a specific mp3 that's no longer available, please let me know, and I'll be happy to send it to you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:16:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://velveteenrabbit.tumblr.com/post/8897950649</title><link>http://velveteenrabbit.tumblr.com/post/8897950649#comment-286100134</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Chrishabana had a more ... genteel-looking one -- see image #7 on this page, right up your alley, i think: &lt;a href="http://www.chrishabana.com/mss10.php" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.chrishabana.com/mss10.php"&gt;http://www.chrishabana.com/...&lt;/a&gt; -- for a few seasons, but I can't find anyone who still has them for sale.  :/&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 02:11:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.therichgirlsareweeping.com/post/8219369514</title><link>http://www.therichgirlsareweeping.com/post/8219369514#comment-268824835</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I considered this, but I can't make it this Monday, sadly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaela</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:20:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>