<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for charliereay</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/charliereay/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/charliereay/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 08:15:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The 10 Principles of Self-Made Billionaires</title><link>http://www.success.com/blog/the-10-principles-of-self-made-billionaires#comment-2798940683</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can find money, it's called "investors". Of course you need a good idea and sales skills to get the investment. That's your responsibility&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">charliereay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 08:15:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 10 Principles of Self-Made Billionaires</title><link>http://www.success.com/blog/the-10-principles-of-self-made-billionaires#comment-2798940588</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can find money, it's called "investors". Of course you need an idea and to be able to sell it. That's your responsibility. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">charliereay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 08:15:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review of the new Doctor Who trailer</title><link>http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2011/04/02/review-of-the-new-doctor-who-trailer/#comment-178432567</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Haha quite funny, but I think you need to get over yourself! And the most over used word was "brilliant" rather than "fabulous"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">charliereay</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 06:26:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pimp my poppy: a charity symbol reinvented</title><link>http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/pimp-my-poppy-a-charity-symbol-reinvented-2122620.html#comment-92975812</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The French don't either. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">charliereay</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:04:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Opening, Social Proof and &amp;#8220;Player in the Game&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.betheseducer.com/2009/08/opening-social-proof-and-player-in-the-game/#comment-13875038</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah I did read it ... it seemed to presume that people didn't know that social proof was only a contributory factor. I'm only a beginner and it seemed obvious to me - maybe I should be grateful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">charliereay</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 08:00:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Opening, Social Proof and &amp;#8220;Player in the Game&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.betheseducer.com/2009/08/opening-social-proof-and-player-in-the-game/#comment-13870249</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm I think this is boiling down to a bit of semantics and how you exactly define it. If I go to a bar with my hot female friends I get tons more AIs that if I go with my male buddies. Sure, if I don't do anything about it then the AIs will die down over time (except for new girls entering the venue). But either way simply having hot girls with you gets you more interest than not, therefore scientifically proving that social proof is a contributory factor!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It won't get you laid (you'll still have to open... duh!) but is sure as dandy helps!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">charliereay</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 03:00:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>