<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for carfield</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/carfield/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/carfield/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 10:43:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Gmail’s supercharged search experience could save you a ton of time</title><link>http://androidpolice.com/2021/06/29/gmails-supercharged-search-experience-could-save-you-a-ton-of-time/#comment-5440132697</link><description>&lt;p&gt;can I sync Trash folder?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 10:43:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gmail’s supercharged search experience could save you a ton of time</title><link>http://androidpolice.com/2021/06/29/gmails-supercharged-search-experience-could-save-you-a-ton-of-time/#comment-5438210953</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, this make the search essentially useless for me..... I prefer leave the indox empty&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 20:57:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Incredibly detailed Google Maps will be available in 50 cities this year</title><link>http://androidpolice.com/2021/05/18/incredibly-detailed-google-maps-will-be-available-in-50-cities-this-year/#comment-5388601100</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yes..... which are the cities have this?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 19:58:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend poll: What software keyboard do you use?</title><link>http://androidpolice.com/2020/09/20/weekend-poll-what-software-keyboard-do-you-use/#comment-5078772277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.milesleung.android.softKeyboard.mixedChineseKeyboard&amp;amp;hl=zh_HK" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.milesleung.android.softKeyboard.mixedChineseKeyboard&amp;amp;hl=zh_HK"&gt;https://play.google.com/sto...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2020 20:45:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unlock your doors from anywhere with the August Smart Lock Pro for only $140 ($140 off)</title><link>http://androidpolice.com/2020/04/30/unlock-your-doors-from-anywhere-with-the-august-smart-lock-pro-for-only-140-140-off/#comment-4896760546</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unlock your doors from anywhere&amp;lt;- I wonder who actually need that "feature".... it sound like a bug more...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2020 00:06:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How programming languages have evolved</title><link>https://www.thoughtworks.com/insights/blog/how-programming-languages-have-evolved#comment-4440358211</link><description>&lt;p&gt;expect they were swinging behind Scala. &amp;lt;- expect or except?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2019 12:50:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I’m 99% Sure this is Hong Kong</title><link>https://stuckincustoms.com/2019/04/03/im-99-sure-this-is-hong-kong/#comment-4407542213</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes it is HK, I am 100% sure about this&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 04:40:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why do I think String.hashCode() is poor</title><link>https://vanilla-java.github.io/2018/08/12/Why-do-I-think-Stringhash-Code-is-poor.html#comment-4038901206</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Probably there are room to apply AI to hashcode generation&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 23:11:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: String.hashCode() is not even a little unique</title><link>https://vanilla-java.github.io/2018/07/26/Stringhash-Code-is-not-even-a-little-unique.html#comment-4013352772</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If it is at github for us to take a look?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 11:44:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: String.hashCode() is not even a little unique</title><link>https://vanilla-java.github.io/2018/07/26/Stringhash-Code-is-not-even-a-little-unique.html#comment-4012011206</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It too bad, if you suggest that we roll our own object with our own hachcode implementation for most case?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2018 12:08:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fluent Interfaces Are Bad for Maintainability</title><link>https://www.yegor256.com/2018/03/13/fluent-interfaces.html#comment-3810627002</link><description>&lt;p&gt;so... are you suggesting decorators are sliver bullet?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 11:33:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Refactoring stringly-typed systems
</title><link>https://kamilszymanski.github.io/refactoring-stringly-typed-systems/#comment-3722246589</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is always trade-off for difference design, most of the case account probably more than just account id, in order to pass object instead of just id, you may need to load the other information, which maybe slow, or maybe not available; maybe you can have some sort of lazy loading logic, but the it add further complication.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, it probably not bad idea for most cases, but it probably not the best idea for all cases either&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:10:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Operator new() is Toxic</title><link>https://www.yegor256.com/2018/01/02/operator-new-is-toxic.html#comment-3689070958</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Guess better to have some examples which solve the problem?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 21:01:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SRP is a Hoax</title><link>https://www.yegor256.com/2017/12/19/srp-is-hoax.html#comment-3670422306</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For me, all principle always guideline but not rule&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 22:23:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How I Would Re-design equals()</title><link>https://www.yegor256.com/2017/07/11/how-to-redesign-equals.html#comment-3412298829</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well then it look like it is always exact comparison, but not sure if that always the use-case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would suggest something like "equals(@NotNull T type)" and "compare(@NotNull T type)", which make use of generic and don't need the duplication of casting and null check. However, backward compatibility is always what we love most, and hate most&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:12:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Samsung Chairman Lee Jae-yong now actually arrested on bribery charges in South Korea</title><link>https://www.androidpolice.com/2017/02/16/samsung-chairman-lee-jae-yong-now-actually-arrested-on-bribery-charges-in-south-korea/#comment-3159391246</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This guy age 50, probably the best spokesman for Korea plastic surgery&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 19:56:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Say hello to Opera Neon, our new concept browser</title><link>http://blogs.opera.com/desktop/2017/01/opera-neon-concept-browser/#comment-3150585252</link><description>&lt;p&gt;work good for me, but how to enable flash?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2017 04:34:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Story of my Wife, her Cancer, and The Healing NET Foundation Charity Event</title><link>https://www.stuckincustoms.com/2016/12/10/the-story-of-my-wife-her-cancer-and-the-healing-net-charity-event/#comment-3046530802</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Take care and will pray for you and your family!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2016 02:07:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 
Remove duplications and fix bad names
</title><link>http://rdafbn.blogspot.com/2015/06/10-team-building-tips.html#comment-2081305322</link><description>&lt;p&gt;well, how about if all / most of your team work at other countries?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:09:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Typical Mistakes in Java Code</title><link>https://www.yegor256.com/2014/04/27/typical-mistakes-in-java-code.html#comment-1360199018</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I see, thanks for sharing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 02:42:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Typical Mistakes in Java Code</title><link>https://www.yegor256.com/2014/04/27/typical-mistakes-in-java-code.html#comment-1359983506</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And, of course, utility classes are anti-patterns, like StringUtils, FileUtils, and IOUtils from Apache. The above are perfect examples of terrible designs. &amp;lt;- Just wonder, how should apache team name those classes?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:38:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When and how to use a ThreadLocal</title><link>http://plumbr.eu/blog/when-and-how-to-use-a-threadlocal#comment-1093159121</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So... for this example, what should Tim if he don't use threadlocal? And given he is required to use java.util.* only for date handling?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 02:57:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Key accomplishments of Eclipse over last 10 years</title><link>http://www.javacodegeeks.com/2012/03/key-accomplishments-of-eclipse-over.html#comment-465796704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;agree!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 03:27:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Java/Scala: Runtime.exec hanging/in &amp;#8216;pipe_w&amp;#8217; state</title><link>http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2011/11/20/javascala-runtime-exec-hangingin-pipe_w-state/#comment-369022851</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess you always need to start a new thread to get output from stdout and stderr if you need to use native process. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BTW, why you don't use the java library for unzip? really huge difference of performance?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:55:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kanban Psychology. Can You Say No?</title><link>http://www.targetprocess.com/blog/2009/12/kanban-psychology-can-you-say-no.html#comment-27544821</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;They may switch to bugs, but they’d lose focus and you have 2 stories in progress that can’t be passed to other developers easily (it will take time to make the transition and it looks like waste, isn’t it?).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I personally think that is wrong&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 04:27:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>