<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for camp185</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/camp185/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/camp185/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:18:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Social Media Score Card: How the Super Bowl Advertisers Performed</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/02/08/super-bowl-advertisers-results/#comment-33094881</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Budweiser had too many commercials, and none of them were very unique. Loved the Simpson/Coke one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">camp185</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:18:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HOW TO: Choose a News Reader for Keeping Tabs on Your Industry</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/12/03/news-reader/#comment-24701031</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You forgot one...toolbar. I use G reader on my phone, but on my desktop I use a kind of unusual one. My SEOBook toolbar. It came with some SEO default feeds, but it allows you to delete and add your own. I like it, because I can just hover over my favorite blog, see what looks good to read, and click...and I'm on the post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">camp185</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:38:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Founder to Murdoch: Blocking Google Will Fail Fast</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/19/biz-stone-warns-murdoch/#comment-23637352</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Classic!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">camp185</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:24:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Low Can You Go? Instant Traffic by Improving your Bounce Rate</title><link>http://geekestateblog.com/how-low-can-you-go-instant-traffic-by-improving-your-bounce-rate/#comment-17809053</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Still though, you don't get it...You realize this post is about lowering the bounce right? By you stating yourself that it may not be a primary goal you acknowledge the fact that it could be a secondary.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you reply don't think I will read...I'm no longer subscribed to this post. Good luck in your quest to teach the world that bounce rate doesn't DO anything...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">camp185</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:02:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Low Can You Go? Instant Traffic by Improving your Bounce Rate</title><link>http://geekestateblog.com/how-low-can-you-go-instant-traffic-by-improving-your-bounce-rate/#comment-17808071</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So are you saying that if I observe a bounce rate of 100% it doesn't matter? Only conversion? By lowering your bounce rate will/do do something. It will improve your odds of conversion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A high bounce rate DOES DO something else as well. It makes the site owners mad.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What is the point of arguing on how I worded it to begin with....so stupid.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">camp185</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:31:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Low Can You Go? Instant Traffic by Improving your Bounce Rate</title><link>http://geekestateblog.com/how-low-can-you-go-instant-traffic-by-improving-your-bounce-rate/#comment-17807456</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Said that man with no name....and it's actually a rate, that make up statistics for a website if you want to be technical about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">camp185</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:13:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Low Can You Go? Instant Traffic by Improving your Bounce Rate</title><link>http://geekestateblog.com/how-low-can-you-go-instant-traffic-by-improving-your-bounce-rate/#comment-17805827</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not only does that low bounce rate make the numbers go up, but it creates new fans. New fans generate even more page views, make comments, tell others, and on an on. Locking in every new visitor is key!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">camp185</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:28:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Truth About Star Wars and the Matrix</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-truth-about-star-wars-and-the-matrix/#comment-15887939</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Breakin the who cares rule today?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">camp185</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:24:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bing Website Optimization</title><link>http://webstrategyworkshop.com/bing-website-optimization/#comment-13670677</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I need to get on this for reasons besides Bing managing Yahoo's search. Bing is quickly becoming a major source of traffic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">camp185</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:14:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-13006342</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hopefully Kevin will fix this, but it now sounds like a business model for some less scrupulous webmasters. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">camp185</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:49:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digg Accused of Twitter Traffic Bait and Switch</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-bait-switch/#comment-12965634</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sure one of the biggest problems for Digg is keeping the visitor. If you look at the html you can see a java onclick script directing the clicker to some crazy ID number. It appears to link directly. I'm wondering how Google sees these links? Will it pass PR if you digg article makes it to page one? If I were digg I wouldn't mess around with redirects. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">camp185</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:29:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Five Tasks in the Morning</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/five-tasks-in-the-morning/#comment-12823899</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So when you work do you leave your email application off? I would imagine your notifier would be going on close to every minute.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">camp185</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:57:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Fresh tools and resources for web developers</title><link>http://woork.blogspot.com/2009/07/10-fresh-tools-and-resources-for-web.html#comment-12510025</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Slick map sounds pretty cool. Never heard of that one. It may increase the use of the sitemap link. Most of my visitors never click on the sitemap pages.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">camp185</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:54:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best Web Image - Web Usability and Design</title><link>http://www.bestwebimage.com/#comment-2805162</link><description>&lt;p&gt;test comment&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">camp185</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:45:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>