<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for cacasodo</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/cacasodo/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/cacasodo/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:26:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Where Is Cover Flow In iTunes 11?</title><link>http://applesliced.com/ask/where-is-cover-flow-in-itunes-11#comment-1123228563</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Though the thread is old, I will add my voice: removing cover flow is a super drag.  Please bring it back, Apple!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cacasodo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:26:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Canon 5D Mark II - The Digital Journalist</title><link>http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0811/the-canon-5d-mark-ii.html#comment-3702508</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK.  I had assumed the pic was of the kit version of the 5d, which would have given you the 24-105mm lens.  That lens comes with a more shallow hood.  Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cacasodo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:40:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Canon 5D Mark II - The Digital Journalist</title><link>http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0811/the-canon-5d-mark-ii.html#comment-3702426</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK.  Thank you for the clarifications.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cacasodo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:32:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Canon 5D Mark II - The Digital Journalist</title><link>http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0811/the-canon-5d-mark-ii.html#comment-3671819</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dirck,&lt;br&gt;What's the make/model of that lens hood you have there in the top pic?  I like it.&lt;br&gt;sodo&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cacasodo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:52:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Canon 5D Mark II - The Digital Journalist</title><link>http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0811/the-canon-5d-mark-ii.html#comment-3669741</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dirck,&lt;br&gt;Thanks for your very readable review.  I have two follow up questions to Victor's question:&lt;br&gt;1) When you mention the camera needs to "rest" after a few minutes, is this because the camera body heats up a bit, as I've read from some of the other reviews online or is there some other artifact that occurs from continual video?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2) Does the statement you make after your paragraph that describes the heat problem: "unless you are going to use a tripod or steadicam mount you need to understand that this camera is NOT a video camera" imply that heat issues will decrease if you keep the camera steady; ie, the camera's sensor is not doing as much work?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;thanks,&lt;br&gt;'sodo&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cacasodo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:47:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>