<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for byrneseyeview</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/byrneseyeview/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/byrneseyeview/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:16:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://bryce.vc/post/11909181900</title><link>http://bryce.vc/post/11909181900#comment-343996739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is short-sighted. The whole point of technology is to do more with less input, and labor is an input. We're replacing secretaries with Google Docs, and salespeople with ever-smarter ads.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the time a company is in the S&amp;amp;P 500, it should be done innovating, and should be in the business of refining its model and getting incrementally more efficient. That's the only way for new ventures to pay off: the chance to recreate the status quo, then earn royalties off it until they get knocked off their perch.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:16:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pulse of the Nation | Kid Dynamite's World</title><link>http://kiddynamitesworld.com/pulse-of-the-nation/#comment-334110154</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Right.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:34:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pulse of the Nation | Kid Dynamite's World</title><link>http://kiddynamitesworld.com/pulse-of-the-nation/#comment-334098250</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I took it when I first noticed, earlier today.I'm in NYC, but my corporate network does some weird stuff with geography. It usually localizes to Sunnyvale (I work at Y).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:19:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pulse of the Nation | Kid Dynamite's World</title><link>http://kiddynamitesworld.com/pulse-of-the-nation/#comment-334069676</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Screenshot! &lt;a href="http://imgur.com/ntbpa" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://imgur.com/ntbpa"&gt;http://imgur.com/ntbpa&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:44:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pulse of the Nation | Kid Dynamite's World</title><link>http://kiddynamitesworld.com/pulse-of-the-nation/#comment-334054394</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Current #1 trending search is Dennis Ritchie (recently deceased inventor of the C programming language, and a big factor in Unix). For what that's worth.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:19:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://digicha.com/index.php/2011/08/digital-due-diligence-plagiarizes-from-digicha-in-report-about-sina-weibo/</title><link>http://digicha.com/index.php/2011/08/digital-due-diligence-plagiarizes-from-digicha-in-report-about-sina-weibo/#comment-293770778</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, I'm the CEO of DDD. I hope you come back!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As you can see in the updated post, it wasn't intentional plagiarism--basically, we posted the original without any links whatsoever, which is also clear from places where the text flows oddly because we'd originally included a link. The reason Bill saw this in the first place was that we tweeted it to him. Not exactly what you'd expect from someone who knowingly stole someone else's content, but exactly what you'd expect from someone who cited it.&lt;br&gt;We do apologize, of course, for temporarily posting a quote from his blog without proper attribution.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:26:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Use Ezinearticles.com For SEO</title><link>http://www.byrnehobart.com/blog/how-to-use-ezinearticles-com-for-seo/#comment-166956522</link><description>&lt;p&gt;See my update at the start of this blog post: as of the "farmer" update, the&lt;br&gt;long-term value of article directories is highly ambiguous. This update&lt;br&gt;shifts things more towards solid on-site content, guest blog posts, maybe&lt;br&gt;even Adsense.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 21:46:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here’s Something You Didn’t Know – Pimco Shares Trading on SecondMarket    The Reformed Broker</title><link>http://www.thereformedbroker.com/2011/03/16/heres-something-you-didnt-know-pimco-shares-trading-on-secondmarket/#comment-166670809</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Doesn't SecondMarket have the opposite effect? We already have a lopsided form of capitalism, in which large companies that can deal with Sarbox have one set of capital sources, small companies that can raise VC funding have another set of capital sources, and there's a big gap in the middle. And now that SecondMarket has an open platform, there's even less of a skew.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seems to me that SecondMarket is creating opportunities, not removing them. It's fine to object to an unequal system, but SecondMarket didn't create the concept of an accredited investor.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:36:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Use Ezinearticles.com For SEO</title><link>http://www.byrnehobart.com/blog/how-to-use-ezinearticles-com-for-seo/#comment-166248196</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hm. Your comment only lists one topic Ezine won't let people write about.&lt;br&gt;What other ones are there?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/ezinearticles.com+articlesbase.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/ezinearticles.com+articlesbase.com/"&gt;http://siteanalytics.compet...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;http: &lt;a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="siteanalytics.compete.com"&gt;siteanalytics.compete.com&lt;/a&gt;="" &lt;a href="http://ezinearticles.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="ezinearticles.com"&gt;ezinearticles.com&lt;/a&gt;+&lt;a href="http://articlesbase.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="articlesbase.com"&gt;articlesbase.com&lt;/a&gt;=""/&amp;gt;And&lt;br&gt;this TC article claims that ArticlesBase gets 20mm visits/month:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/11/articlesbase-the-profitable-content-farm-with-20m-monthly-visitors-you-dont-know/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/11/articlesbase-the-profitable-content-farm-with-20m-monthly-visitors-you-dont-know/"&gt;http://techcrunch.com/2011/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;http: &lt;a href="http://techcrunch.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="techcrunch.com"&gt;techcrunch.com&lt;/a&gt;="" 2011="" 02="" 11="" articlesbase-the-profitable-content-farm-with-20m-monthly-visitors-you-dont-know=""/&amp;gt;While&lt;br&gt;Ezine claims 56mm uniques:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2011/02/search-engine-algorithm-changes.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2011/02/search-engine-algorithm-changes.html"&gt;http://blog.ezinearticles.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;http: &lt;a href="http://blog.ezinearticles.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="blog.ezinearticles.com"&gt;blog.ezinearticles.com&lt;/a&gt;="" 2011="" 02="" search-engine-algorithm-changes.html=""&amp;gt;Your&lt;br&gt;move.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:41:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Short the Higher Education Bubble</title><link>http://www.byrnehobart.com/blog/how-to-short-the-higher-education-bubble/#comment-147955599</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's not a direct relationship; if I were putting together a real portfolio&lt;br&gt;based on this, I wouldn't do the revenue per employee thing; I might use&lt;br&gt;LinkedIn to find out which companies had lots of Ivy-League employees, but&lt;br&gt;tended not to get people poached by better banks or by hedge funds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are other signals, too:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/11/05/thiel-gop-weakness-oped-cx_pr_1106robinson.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.forbes.com/2008/11/05/thiel-gop-weakness-oped-cx_pr_1106robinson.html"&gt;http://www.forbes.com/2008/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 19:06:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Challenge for Net Neutrality Supporters</title><link>http://www.byrnehobart.com/blog/a-challenge-for-net-neutrality-supporters/#comment-119830702</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That doesn't make much sense. What does Pizza Hut's cost structure have to&lt;br&gt;do with anything? If they're a more profitable company, that doesn't mean&lt;br&gt;that they can do stuff that doesn't make economic sense. It's orthogonal to&lt;br&gt;the main point. Regardless of how profitable they are, driving competitors&lt;br&gt;into bankruptcy is only beneficial to them to the extent that they can&lt;br&gt;capture most of the benefits. And yet without extremely high market share,&lt;br&gt;they can't--for example, if they have 20% market share, eliminating&lt;br&gt;competitors provides 4X as much benefit to non-Pizza Hut companies compared&lt;br&gt;to Pizza Hut (80% versus 20%).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your hypothetical example only makes sense with monopolistic ISPs, and those&lt;br&gt;are going to be increasingly hard to maintain.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are few direct analogies to online businesses, which is why I&lt;br&gt;suggested the thought experiment: if Comcast makes themselves an inferior&lt;br&gt;service for everything except Comcast-specific content, is that a net&lt;br&gt;competitive advantage? Or is that a net subsidy to everyone but Comcast? If&lt;br&gt;you were Comcast's CEO, is this how you'd behave? I don't see how it's&lt;br&gt;possible to be a) outraged at such behavior to the extent that it makes your&lt;br&gt;Internet experience worse, and b) pretty sure it's a good idea, from the&lt;br&gt;company's perspective.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 13:38:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Use Ezinearticles.com For SEO</title><link>http://www.byrnehobart.com/blog/how-to-use-ezinearticles-com-for-seo/#comment-110734564</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The resource box link(s) are followed, so that's useful. The other link is&lt;br&gt;nofollowed, but gets a decent number of clicks. For example, this article:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?2008-Tax-Extension-Form---Missing-This-Deadline-Could-Cost-You!&amp;amp;id=2578190" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ezinearticles.com/?2008-Tax-Extension-Form---Missing-This-Deadline-Could-Cost-You!&amp;amp;id=2578190"&gt;http://ezinearticles.com/?2...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;http: &lt;a href="http://ezinearticles.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="ezinearticles.com"&gt;ezinearticles.com&lt;/a&gt;="" ?2008-tax-extension-form---missing-this-deadline-could-cost-you!&amp;amp;id="2578190"&amp;gt;Has&lt;br&gt;about 3K views with a 20% click-through. Given where those users go, their&lt;br&gt;conversion rate, and what they pay when they get there, the ROI on this&lt;br&gt;piece was just staggering.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In general, more links = more clicks, so that bumps up ROI further.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My rule of thumb is that I write good, original stuff on my own site, but&lt;br&gt;I'll usually benefit from rehashing it on Ezine (or any of about a dozen&lt;br&gt;other article directories).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:46:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Demand Media’s IPO: Everything You Need to Know</title><link>http://www.byrnehobart.com/blog/demand-medias-ipo-everything-you-need-to-know/#comment-87234046</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's in an old press release on the merger, I believe. Or possibly from&lt;br&gt;their last 10-K, which is on &lt;a href="http://sec.gov" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="sec.gov"&gt;sec.gov&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:07:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Higher Education: The Next Big, Bad Bubble</title><link>http://www.byrnehobart.com/blog/higher-education-the-next-big-bad-bubble/#comment-86091868</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks! If you have some post-recession data, I would be interested. I've&lt;br&gt;heard about budget cuts for schools, but salary cuts for teachers tend to be&lt;br&gt;rarer. And pensions appear to be untouched.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My main point was not that you'll make six figures as a teacher, but that&lt;br&gt;within a given market, teacher salaries are very predictable. If you know&lt;br&gt;what a teacher made at 25, and you know they won't change jobs, you have a&lt;br&gt;pretty good idea of what they'll make at 50. The same can't be said for e.g.&lt;br&gt;engineers, lawyers, doctors, or manual laborers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:27:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Demand Media’s IPO: Everything You Need to Know</title><link>http://www.byrnehobart.com/blog/demand-medias-ipo-everything-you-need-to-know/#comment-86091534</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Social bookmarking sites either do vastly better or vastly worse than&lt;br&gt;expected; an article like this, posted on HN, will either get 50 views or&lt;br&gt;5,000, but rarely anything in between.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:24:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Demand Media’s IPO: Everything You Need to Know</title><link>http://www.byrnehobart.com/blog/demand-medias-ipo-everything-you-need-to-know/#comment-86091399</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Revenue = all the money paid to the company, ignoring expenses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Operating cash flow = revenue, minus expenses relating to the operations of&lt;br&gt;the business, ignoring depreciation and cash flow.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So if your lemonade stand sells $10 of lemonade, that's your revenue. If&lt;br&gt;it's staffed by volunteers and you used $5 worth of lemons, your operating&lt;br&gt;cash flow is $5. If you invested $1 in a pitcher, and paid $2 in interest on&lt;br&gt;the loan you used to get started, your total cash flow is $2 ($10 in&lt;br&gt;revenue, minus $5 in operating costs, $1 in capital expenditures, and $2 in&lt;br&gt;financing cash flows).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:23:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Phony Scalability of &amp;#8220;Local,&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;Long-Tail.&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.byrnehobart.com/blog/the-phony-scalability-of-local-and-long-tail/#comment-84930920</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's a good point. Yelp appears to have tons of salespeople, or at least&lt;br&gt;sales and marketing people:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.linkedin.com/company/yelp.com/statistics" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.linkedin.com/company/yelp.com/statistics"&gt;http://www.linkedin.com/com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But they do have a competitive advantage because business owners know who&lt;br&gt;they are. It will be interesting to see if that helps them compete with the&lt;br&gt;other group buying sites.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:04:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Win a Date with ME to Wall Street 2!</title><link>http://www.howardlindzon.com/win-a-date-with-me-to-wall-street-2/#comment-80132338</link><description>&lt;p&gt;'The most valuable commodity I know of is information. Real-time information, in 140-character increments."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:07:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Next Step for Facebook $FBOOK&amp;#8230;Debt Sale</title><link>http://www.howardlindzon.com/next-step-for-facebook-fbook-debt-sale/#comment-77484973</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They've issued debt before--some through Western Technology Investments (which lent early and got cheap warrants) and $100mm through TriplePoint.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At current valuations, they would probably prefer equity, just because they'll get more flexibility. At a $25b-$30b valuation, Zuck can raise a lot of money without giving up control. But if he has some kind of plan that involves switching from revenue growth to another goal for the next few years, debtholders might be able to stop it, while shareholders won't.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 07:06:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Higher Education: The Next Big, Bad Bubble</title><link>http://www.byrnehobart.com/blog/higher-education-the-next-big-bad-bubble/#comment-75739854</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. I have a job. I know a bit about the job prospects of people who&lt;br&gt;graduated from college when I would have; I invited a lot of them to job&lt;br&gt;interviews, and rejected the vast majority.&lt;br&gt;2. You read my blog post--not all of it, but some of it. Did you find any&lt;br&gt;flaws?&lt;br&gt;3. I don't have a problem with it. I tell people I had better things to do.&lt;br&gt;Life is short; how much of it do you want to spend jumping through arbitrary&lt;br&gt;hoops?&lt;br&gt;4. I guess you're talking about used bookstores. Or libraries. Or the&lt;br&gt;Internet. I've learned a lot more from all of those than I have from school.&lt;br&gt;5. College does a terrible job of actually handling diversity. Colleges&lt;br&gt;encourage people to isolate themselves in clubs and student organizations&lt;br&gt;that are stratified based on minority group identification. Meanwhile, I&lt;br&gt;have no trouble meeting such people in real life.&lt;br&gt;6. Okay.&lt;br&gt;7. They would kill for an Ivy League education, or a hard-science education&lt;br&gt;from a lower-tier school. But nobody immigrates to the US so they can send&lt;br&gt;their kids to the University of Phoenix. Meanwhile, as I discussed in the&lt;br&gt;post, the biggest growth is coming from bad schools and low-value degrees.&lt;br&gt;Meanwhile, the average value of a degree is going up at less than the rate&lt;br&gt;of inflation, while the cost is going up at twice the rate of inflation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The data are clear. On average, the person who joins the college-going&lt;br&gt;population now is going to pay too much for a bad degree from a bad school,&lt;br&gt;if the even manage to finish. This is subsidized by the government (i.e. by&lt;br&gt;the taxpayers). The situation will worsen unless people are aware of it, and&lt;br&gt;I'm raising awareness.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your comments, but I don't believe you have properly addressed&lt;br&gt;any of my claims.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:37:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://ziweb.tumblr.com/post/1077707392</title><link>http://ziweb.tumblr.com/post/1077707392#comment-75737805</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I believe you've misunderstood a few parts of the essay.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. Progress doesn't end with the Great Boom. The Great Boom would be a period of globalization similar to what you'd get if you extrapolated from the mid- to late-90's: lots of growth, lots of specialization, rapidly advancing technology, etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. He isn't saying that we must spend money on defense. Just that the defense sector has not advanced technologically in the way that other sectors have. I sort of disagree with this; we're actually very close to the kind of invulnerable armored cyborg someone might have predicted in the 80's, except that the 'cyborg' part is more widely distributed, and the balance between medicine and body armor currently favors medicine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;War has a terrible ROI. Assets get destroyed. But losing wars has a worse ROI than winning them, so some nonzero level of defense spending is optimal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:27:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Introducing our Partnership with SecondMarket and Private Company Streams</title><link>http://www.howardlindzon.com/introducing-our-partnership-with-secondmarket-and-private-company-streams/#comment-72813637</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ha, I think I asked SecondMarket *and* Stocktwits to do this. Extremely cool.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is the list based on what's on the SecondMarket system, or another list? Could also be interesting to add secondary interests in hedge funds and PE firms (i.e. "$BX_CAPV" for Blackstone's 2006 fund, or "$DESHAW" for D. E. Shaw), since SM is involved in those, and the folks who care about private company stocks may also have an interest in that kind of asset.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 11:50:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Symbology</title><link>http://avc.com/2010/08/symbology/#comment-72810312</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's a big difference between thinking about the company and thinking about the investment. There are lots of people who think Google is evil and $GOOG is fantastic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The information isn't necessarily accurate, but the point is not to have perfect information, just to aggregate a certain kind of information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The conversation about how Open Graph should impact someone creating a consumer web service is orthogonal to the conversation about how Open Graph's data could help $FBOOK target ads better, thus raising their revenue materially. Better to have specific venues for each part of the conversation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 11:27:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Symbology</title><link>http://avc.com/2010/08/symbology/#comment-72809617</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Five letters also used to mean delinquent filers (if the letter was "E"). Here's the list of other stuff it can mean:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&amp;amp;q=cache:CSku6vXXPkQJ:www.nasdaqtrader.com/content/technicalsupport/specifications/dataproducts/nasdaqfifthcharactersuffixlist.pdf+e+symbol+suffix&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;gl=us&amp;amp;pid=bl&amp;amp;srcid=ADGEESgI4xzfGOXrLAFUlW63uTVBuQNjlOIdrI321APiBN7gSNSeH4tKDbJVPYxoK1q615uznTFknOvPaIfk_7bvMiUjMe2l87T6aJl4MjEwBSFSzTzntiA0P7iP8nzHRWl8sFcIUMXP&amp;amp;sig=AHIEtbSyzb8vTH3rTxYlcO35qH8toD1NfA" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&amp;amp;q=cache:CSku6vXXPkQJ:www.nasdaqtrader.com/content/technicalsupport/specifications/dataproducts/nasdaqfifthcharactersuffixlist.pdf+e+symbol+suffix&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;gl=us&amp;amp;pid=bl&amp;amp;srcid=ADGEESgI4xzfGOXrLAFUlW63uTVBuQNjlOIdrI321APiBN7gSNSeH4tKDbJVPYxoK1q615uznTFknOvPaIfk_7bvMiUjMe2l87T6aJl4MjEwBSFSzTzntiA0P7iP8nzHRWl8sFcIUMXP&amp;amp;sig=AHIEtbSyzb8vTH3rTxYlcO35qH8toD1NfA"&gt;http://docs.google.com/view...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So someone who has been trading for a while and sees $SKYPE assumes that it's $SKYP, but they haven't filed their latest 10-Q.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 11:21:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Symbology</title><link>http://avc.com/2010/08/symbology/#comment-72809275</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wouldn't it be analogous to Foursquare location descriptions, or Twitter handles and hashtags? i.e. I identify myself as @byrneseyeview on Twitter; it's open in the sense that I didn't have to ask permission. And I've created and edited venues on Foursquare, too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is so closed about Twitter and Foursquare? They both seem designed to let other people do interesting things with them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">byrneseyeview</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 11:18:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>