<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for bushbasher</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/bushbasher/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/bushbasher/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:42:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: First things first</title><link>http://anonymouslefty.blogspot.com/2009/01/first-things-first.html#comment-4890396</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i hope the "no more sarcasm" was sarcasm. more polly! (and mini-polly when he/she arrives).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bushbasher</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:42:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I'm not a homophobe, I just think equal rights for gays will destroy us all</title><link>http://anonymouslefty.blogspot.com/2008/12/im-not-homophobe-i-just-think-equal.html#comment-4669193</link><description>&lt;p&gt;well, yeah. if you define marriage as heterosexual then homosexuals can't marry. i wither from the force of your brilliant logic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bushbasher</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 15:58:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why won't the warmenistas concede every time it snows?</title><link>http://anonymouslefty.blogspot.com/2008/11/take-that-warmenistas.html#comment-4049390</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i think pretty much everything nic is saying in this thread about the scientific debate is manipulative and silly. but i have to agree with him, that  people shivering during a global warming protest is very very funny. humour doesn't have to be fair. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bushbasher</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 07:16:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why won't the warmenistas concede every time it snows?</title><link>http://anonymouslefty.blogspot.com/2008/11/take-that-warmenistas.html#comment-4044101</link><description>&lt;p&gt;nic, yes science is always open to attack. the question is, is the person doing the attacking worth the attention? in the case of blair and bolt, the answer is a clear no.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bushbasher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:35:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why won't the warmenistas concede every time it snows?</title><link>http://anonymouslefty.blogspot.com/2008/11/take-that-warmenistas.html#comment-4043086</link><description>&lt;p&gt;there's probably a few thousand people on the planet who know enough to form a reasoned and informed opinion on AGW. what we can form a reasoned and informed opinion on is the nature of the scientific process and the scientific community, and who we should reasonably trust.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;it is not opinions on AGW here that can be of value. it is opinions on who is a knowitall anti-scientific twat. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bushbasher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:37:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What have the homeless done for me lately?</title><link>http://anonymouslefty.blogspot.com/2008/11/what-have-homeless-done-for-me-lately.html#comment-3965792</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ah, reap's a treasure. mighty matt, but without the nuance.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bushbasher</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:49:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>