<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for btitus</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/btitus/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/btitus/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:33:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: IKEA Switches to 3D Rendering, Says Heydå (Bye) to Photography</title><link>https://www.solidsmack.com/design/ikea-switches-to-3d-rendering-says-heyda-bye-to-photography/#comment-632500240</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome stuff.  I wonder how they modeled/rendered those tasty waffles...Or are they Swedish pancakes?  In either case it's making me hungry...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">btitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:33:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#039;s Have a Giveaway! 10 Copies of Backup4all Pro Up for Grabs.</title><link>https://www.solidsmack.com/3d-cad-technology/lets-have-a-giveaway-10-copies-of-backup4all-pro-up-for-grabs/#comment-632497538</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've used various backup software with mixed results (mostly performance).  I'm currently using SOS and not overwhelmingly pleased.  I use backup to "protect" customer files.  On more than one occasion it's saved my neck...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">btitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:29:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SolidWorks World 2010 � That�s a wrap�dammit!</title><link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2010/02/solidworks-world-2010-%e2%80%93-that%e2%80%99s-a-wrap%e2%80%a6dammit/#comment-33243015</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's all about the money.  Actually, if memory serves me correctly SolidWorks has typically charged around $150 to go to the special event.  How much did they charge this year?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sure it wasn't off-site.&lt;br&gt;Sure there wasn't the bottomless well of hard alcohol.&lt;br&gt;Sure you couldn't see 5 feet in front of your face.&lt;br&gt;Sure the Aerosmith tribute band wasn't actually Aerosmith&lt;br&gt;Sure the took way too long to get too little food&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What do you expect?  It's free beer and food!&lt;br&gt;I guess people just expect too much.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">btitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:46:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Don&amp;#039;t Care, I&amp;#039;m Keeping My Distance From Robots Powered By the DEAD.</title><link>https://www.solidsmack.com/3d-cad-technology/i-dont-care-im-keeping-my-distance-from-robots-powered-by-the-dead/#comment-12707301</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When I first saw this it got me thinking about all sorts of things...&lt;br&gt;Why does this make me think of Soylent Green?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2008/nov/25-anything-into-oil" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://discovermagazine.com/2008/nov/25-anything-into-oil"&gt;http://discovermagazine.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">btitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:55:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eeny, Meeny, What Comes Next? High End CAD on OS X.</title><link>https://www.solidsmack.com/cad-design-news/siemens-nx6-on-mac-linux-gui/#comment-10940915</link><description>&lt;p&gt;AS Josh eluded to, Apple has been developing it's products on NX for some time.  I'm sure there are is some advantages for Apple to be able to develop its products on its own hardware but all in all this is really just a political move for Siemens.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Will it pay off? Will people switch to NX just because it's available on the MAC?&lt;br&gt;Are the other CAD vendors really afraid of this move?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In my opinion, the added headache/development time isn't worth small amount of POTENTIAL market share..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Besides, if MAC users really want to do CAD, there is always Vellum...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">btitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:46:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SolidWorks Crashes &amp;#038; Slowdowns &amp;#8211; A clarification</title><link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2009/05/solidworks-crashes-slowdowns-a-clarification/#comment-10261777</link><description>&lt;p&gt;AMEN Brutha!  Everyone seems to want to bash SolidWorks inability to produce a stable product.  People do have to understand that it's a tough balancing act SW has to play between adding new functionality and maintaining stability and all the while trying to gain market share. As far as they are concerned there is still plenty of market share out there.   SolidWorks only has 370K seats..uh I mean 1 Million seats...There's still plenty more there...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">btitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:05:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Stuff Part II</title><link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/?p=353#comment-8640261</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hrmm..&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1998_Oct_22/ai_53113081/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1998_Oct_22/ai_53113081/"&gt;http://findarticles.com/p/a...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">btitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:06:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SolidWorks on Mac: CEO Speaks Out. You Have Your Say. {Poll}</title><link>https://www.solidsmack.com/cad-design-news/solidwork-mac-apple-cad/#comment-8581790</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree.  MAINSTREAM doesn't always mean BEST.&lt;br&gt;(i.e. Blue-Ray vs HD-DVD, VHS vs BetaMax, Word vs Wordperfect, etc..).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CAD (and other) vendors just have to live with (and give in to) what the public wants.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">btitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:25:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SolidWorks on Mac: CEO Speaks Out. You Have Your Say. {Poll}</title><link>https://www.solidsmack.com/cad-design-news/solidwork-mac-apple-cad/#comment-8563231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Non-mainstream (MAC / Linux) users have been arguing cross platform capability for years.  Let's face it WINDOWS is and will continue to be the main business OS platform for engineering. Developing  SolidWorks on ANY OTHER PLATFORM would be foolish.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">btitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 02:05:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SolidWorks Crashes and Slowdowns, Part 2</title><link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2009/04/solidworks-crashes-and-slowdowns-part-2/#comment-8562716</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I get issues all the time with new software that I install.  I make sure EVERYTIME I install something new that I do a REPAIR on my SolidWorks intallation to ensure all the system DLL's are the proper version and registered correctly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">btitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:26:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SolidWorks Certification &amp;#8211; Win one of ten free exams!</title><link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2009/04/solidworks-certification-win-one-of-ten-free-exams/#comment-8281429</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd rather stab myself in the eye with a red-hot fire poker...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">btitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:34:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Important Site Annoucement &amp;#8211; April Fools 2009</title><link>http://www.theswgeek.com/2009/04/01/important-site-annoucement/#comment-7735550</link><description>&lt;p&gt;April Fools...&lt;br&gt;Too bad cuz I love Star Wars...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">btitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:27:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SolidWorks 2009 SP3 Removes Display State Option?</title><link>https://www.cadfanatic.com/2009/03/solidworks-2009-sp3-removes-display-state-option/#comment-7698203</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, it appears that this may be a regression.&lt;br&gt;According to the help, the option should still be there&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">btitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:10:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Secret SolidWorks Command?</title><link>https://www.cadfanatic.com/2009/03/secret-solidworks-command/#comment-7532767</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been using CTRL-Q for years. Certainly beats turning on "Verification on Rebuild" and suffering the huge performance hit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's almost second nature now.  When I get pause in thinking, I just CTRL-Q and don't even notice any lag.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's also a good rule of thumb to CTRL-Q your models AFTER upgrading to a new service pack.  You never know where there might be a regression.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">btitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:52:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Big Book of SolidWorks Selections Tricks (In One Little Post)</title><link>https://www.solidsmack.com/cad/the-big-book-of-solidworks-selections-tricks-in-one-little-post/#comment-7328045</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post.   But when will SolidWorks know what I want to select BEFORE I select it???&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">btitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:29:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Engineer Stimulus Package</title><link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2009/02/engineer-stimulus-package/#comment-6674105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This has the murmurings of the 3D-Skills program&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">btitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:57:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ask the Reader: What Do You Love/Hate About Upgrading to SolidWorks 2009?</title><link>https://www.solidsmack.com/cad/upgrading-to-solidworks-2009-love-hate/#comment-4170065</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just recently did an upgrade at a client from 2007 + PDM Enterprise to 2009 SP1.  Skipped 2008 altogether do to stability issues. By the time they decided to upgrade, 2009 was already released.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Utilized an admin image + network license and experienced little (if any) problems.&lt;br&gt;The biggest hassle was converting (library) files up to 2009 using the Task Scheduler.&lt;br&gt;After 10 years of SolidWorks upgrades, this one went smoother than expected. Not perfect, but better than expected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The customer uses FX1300 video cards.  They work decent but are looking to upgrade later this year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Overall, the client is happy with 2009 so far.  It's probably a combination of the new (2008) interface plus the new stuff in 2009.  PhotoView 360 is a big hit.  New enhancements in SolidWorks Enterprise PDM are well liked.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">btitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:59:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>