<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for bryanmckay</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/bryanmckay/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/bryanmckay/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:37:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Areas in which my expertise is embarrassingly lacking </title><link>http://sarzha.tumblr.com/post/850376344#comment-63948696</link><description>&lt;p&gt;90s pop music = not very good&lt;br&gt;how to order coffee = black, or maybe with cream &amp;amp; sugar if that's your thing, but if it's good, you should just leave it alone&lt;br&gt;philosophy = mental masturbation&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:37:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://georgiaisyourfriend.tumblr.com/post/781774820</title><link>http://georgiaisyourfriend.tumblr.com/post/781774820#comment-60976049</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable we have to alter it every six months." – Oscar Wilde&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:21:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://fromme-toyou.tumblr.com/post/780960145</title><link>http://fromme-toyou.tumblr.com/post/780960145#comment-60927543</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool, more subtle visual references than I was thinking. His 1940s films have a similar b&amp;amp;w, high-key style to your photograph, so I was thinking along those lines. Either way, it's a great shot!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:30:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://fromme-toyou.tumblr.com/post/780960145</title><link>http://fromme-toyou.tumblr.com/post/780960145#comment-60925572</link><description>&lt;p&gt;(Which is still totally awesome.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:13:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://fromme-toyou.tumblr.com/post/780960145</title><link>http://fromme-toyou.tumblr.com/post/780960145#comment-60924402</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you're channeling Hitchcock, the look of this picture (except for maybe the hair) feels much more 1940s Hitch than 1960s.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:02:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My instant review of the LOST finale. (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2010/05/24/myInstantReviewOfTheLostFi.html#comment-51887789</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I strongly disagree that it stands alone. It might feel that way after having watched the show for six seasons, but I think it would be nearly impossible for anyone to follow the story without being intimately familiar with the show and its characters.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Having said that, it "stands alone" in the sense that it resolves really only the narrative aspects of this season and, I suppose, some of the character arcs. I found myself being a little disappointed that the mythology wasn't either a) resolved more clearly or b) left with a giant gaping inexplicable hole (a last-minute twist?)  that we'd ponder for years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I understand that I might be in the minority as a viewer who never cared much about the characters (most of them, anyway) and was always more interested in the mythology and sci-fi aspectds of the show. Anyway, though I don't agree with your reactions, they were nice to read nonetheless.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 08:17:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://meaghano.com/post/617025782</title><link>http://meaghano.com/post/617025782#comment-51281193</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I also guess it is possible that my first reaction was to take that way too seriously?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 16:47:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://meaghano.com/post/617025782</title><link>http://meaghano.com/post/617025782#comment-51280496</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think everything you (and Melissa too!) said was really smart/on-point except that last bit: "Oh, but also? We do what we want! That’s why we did it this way!" Because, really, you made a great case for *why* you're doing it the way you're doing it, and then you end on a sort of dismissive-y note (attempt at humor?) that I feel undermines the general friendly community spirit of your whole awesome book project.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 16:42:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://sarzha.tumblr.com/post/616829074</title><link>http://sarzha.tumblr.com/post/616829074#comment-51267054</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, it's not *about* to burst. The book is set in the earlier part of the decade and the bubble didn't burst until around 2000. So they've got a few years to get extraordinarily wealthy before things fall apart.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 15:00:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://48hrmag.com/blog/39-post-game-wrap-up</title><link>http://48hrmag.com/blog/39-post-game-wrap-up#comment-49982565</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool! I just remembered the Gizmodo interview where the price was quoted at $10 (or $9.60 before markup) for 48 pages, so I just wasn't sure what the final costs/profits were. If that was disclosed previously, I must have missed it. Thanks for the response, Alexis!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 18:10:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://48hrmag.com/blog/39-post-game-wrap-up</title><link>http://48hrmag.com/blog/39-post-game-wrap-up#comment-49976891</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So, in the spirit of transparency, are you getting some sort of discount from MagCloud that you haven't mentioned? Because I'm pretty sure a 60-page publication would cost $12 + your markup, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 17:40:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://abbyjean.tumblr.com/post/571561475</title><link>http://abbyjean.tumblr.com/post/571561475#comment-48398795</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe this is misplaced cynicism, but while I recognize the political message this is sending, I wonder how the disabled community would feel if American Apparel *did* use disabled models in their ads? Another company might be able to get away with it, but given American Apparel's image, I feel like people would just cry "exploitation!" if there were to actually make ads like this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, if American Apparel *were* producing ads like this, they likely *would* be exploitation, so it probably wouldn't be an unfair claim to make.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 16:25:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://tomatoallergy.tumblr.com/post/411360373</title><link>http://tomatoallergy.tumblr.com/post/411360373#comment-36468955</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I grew up in Branford, and I am an unabashed Sally's loyalist, having gone there for most of my life. (I live in Boston now, so whenever I visit my parents, I make sure we go get a pizza.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But, Sally's! It is so thin! And delicious!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:52:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://tomatoallergy.tumblr.com/post/411360373</title><link>http://tomatoallergy.tumblr.com/post/411360373#comment-36466517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pepe's is OK, but Sally's is SO. MUCH. BETTER.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's my public service announcement from a fellow ex-New Haven County resident.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:42:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://tylercoates.tumblr.com/post/380095205</title><link>http://tylercoates.tumblr.com/post/380095205#comment-33272755</link><description>&lt;p&gt; I am listening to this podcast now and for what it's worth, I think she is calling his writing "parodic."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:28:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://nerdshares.tumblr.com/post/380106075</title><link>http://nerdshares.tumblr.com/post/380106075#comment-33272465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;On the plus side, I am listening to the podcast now and she's definitely saying "parodic," so we can stop using that fake(?) word in scare quotes now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, Katie Roiphe is horrible and I don't know if I can stand listening to her for the rest of this thing!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:26:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://nerdshares.tumblr.com/post/380106075</title><link>http://nerdshares.tumblr.com/post/380106075#comment-33250036</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I find McCarthy's writing varies wildly between almost obscenely baroque (á la Blood Meridian) and incredibly terse and, er, "periodic" (i.e. The Road, No Country for Old Men).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:55:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://abbyjean.tumblr.com/post/356346870</title><link>http://abbyjean.tumblr.com/post/356346870#comment-31535770</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You may want to check out some of the more recent studies on neti pot use. I guess use to relieve symptoms is OK, but daily "preventative" use can actually lead to /more/ sinus infections. Mucus is good for you, and you don't want to flush it all out!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:12:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: molls...she wrote</title><link>http://molls.tumblr.com/post/235562368#comment-22079458</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why is Molls sad?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:25:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tonight</title><link>http://hershapeinthedoorway.tumblr.com/post/173053258#comment-15537058</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sweetwater is like... THE Emerson bar. I don't know what it is like for grad students, but as an undergrad, I could walk in there almost any time of day and run into people I knew.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:19:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Um, why are there no liquor stores here?</title><link>http://hershapeinthedoorway.tumblr.com/post/158320141#comment-14730529</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All liquor stores here close by 11, I think. You just need to stock up. You get used to it. (I've lived in New England all my life, so the idea of buying liquor in a convenience store is a total novelty to me.) There's a liquor store on Charles Street in Beacon Hill, btw. If you want to stock up for cheap though with a GREAT selection, take the green B-line out to Blanchard's liquor store in Allston. It's a block or two north from the Harvard Ave stop.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:41:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: this.might.suck - i’m so anti-feminism (and yes i’m a girl)</title><link>http://thismightsuck.tumblr.com/post/159423869#comment-14532977</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is just a joke that I'm missing, right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And if it's not, then do you think women aren't meant to get paid equally? Or treated fairly in the workplace? Or, you know, vote?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 22:29:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: this.might.suck - i’m so anti-feminism (and yes i’m a girl)</title><link>http://thismightsuck.tumblr.com/post/159423869#comment-14531794</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wait, what? Are you sure you know what you're talking about here?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:50:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Life is hard. Here is someone.</title><link>http://meaghano.com/post/156817900#comment-14015072</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I read VACATION. It was really good. It's a pretty quick read too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 22:29:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Reblog Blog</title><link>http://mollyandtheinternet.tumblr.com/post/155049734#comment-13845399</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought of you when I saw it/posted it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanmckay</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:45:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>