<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for briancarnell</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/briancarnell/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/briancarnell/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2019 21:40:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Screw your carrier, here's how to enable RCS in the Messages app yourself right now</title><link>http://androidpolice.com/2019/10/26/screw-your-carrier-heres-how-to-enable-rcs-in-the-messages-app-yourself-right-now/#comment-4667107084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;and without the encryption&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2019 21:40:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screw your carrier, here's how to enable RCS in the Messages app yourself right now</title><link>http://androidpolice.com/2019/10/26/screw-your-carrier-heres-how-to-enable-rcs-in-the-messages-app-yourself-right-now/#comment-4667106641</link><description>&lt;p&gt;RCS = no end to end encryption.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2019 21:39:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Details On Low Attendance For WWE Stomping Grounds: Paid Attendance Reportedly Between 4,000 to 4,500</title><link>https://411mania.com/wrestling/more-details-on-low-attendance-for-wwe-stomping-grounds-paid-attendance-reportedly-between-4000-to-4500/#comment-4514273971</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Attendance at house shows has been declining as well. Average attendance in Q4 2017 was 5,550 for example, but declined to 5,000 in Q4 2018.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.wrestlinginc.com/news/2019/02/a-look-at-wwe-live-attendance-decline-650826/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.wrestlinginc.com/news/2019/02/a-look-at-wwe-live-attendance-decline-650826/"&gt;https://www.wrestlinginc.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:51:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comedian Details Turning Down Lucha Underground Spot Due To Their Problematic Contracts</title><link>https://www.wrestlinginc.com/news/2019/05/comedian-details-turning-down-lucha-underground-spot-due-to-653753/#comment-4449285880</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a huge difference between WWE contracts and what Lucha Underground is doing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;WWE contracts may strongly favor the company, but they don't potentially force wrestlers who want to work to sit and wait for (potentially) years without any pay and without being able to work elsewhere.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lucha Underground's contract are the "hold my beer" response to WWE as they don't appear to have *any* downside guarantee provisions.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2019 11:06:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dolphins Seem to Use Toxic Pufferfish to Get High</title><link>http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/dolphins-seem-to-use-toxic-pufferfish-to-get-high-180948219/#comment-4342026130</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there any scientific evidence that this is what's really going on in these encounters?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://justingregg.com/evidence-for-dolphins-getting-high-on-puffer-fish-toxin-is-weak/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://justingregg.com/evidence-for-dolphins-getting-high-on-puffer-fish-toxin-is-weak/"&gt;http://justingregg.com/evid...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2019 13:57:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Android’s Real Security Problem is the Manufacturers</title><link>https://www.howtogeek.com/404700/androids-real-security-problem-is-the-manufacturers/#comment-4341968056</link><description>&lt;p&gt;End users should not have to go to that extreme, and would likely not be able to accurately interpret the results that come up in such a Google search.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2019 13:11:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Android’s Real Security Problem is the Manufacturers</title><link>https://www.howtogeek.com/404700/androids-real-security-problem-is-the-manufacturers/#comment-4341200044</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Carriers are also a significant player in delaying Android updates.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2019 21:14:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Pay a 30 Year Mortgage over 15 Years</title><link>https://www.cfinancialfreedom.com/pay-30-year-mortgage-15-years/#comment-3833416169</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had the same thought when I read this:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"The main drawback that I see is that when you take out a 30 year loan with the intention of paying it back over 15 years, that rarely happens in reality.  Most people go in with good intentions, but paying that set amount extra every month is a hard habit to maintain.  It's just too tempting to use that money somewhere else."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can see that, but this "you're forced to make the higher payment" could also push you closer to default if you have a significant life change.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd hate to end up in a situation where I switch jobs or something else happens where I could have continued to make the 30 year payments, but am suddenly having difficulty covering the 15 year ones.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2018 16:48:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Booker T Threatens Corey Graves After Losing Raw Commentary Spot, Calls Graves Out to a Shoot Fight</title><link>https://www.prowrestling.com/booker-t-threatens-corey-graves-losing-raw-commentary-spot-challenges-fight-wrestlemania/#comment-3743156127</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Work.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:16:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Marie Curie Helped Save a Million Soldiers During World War I</title><link>http://theinstitute.ieee.org/tech-history/technology-history/how-marie-curie-helped-save-a-million-soldiers-during-world-war-i#comment-3420904369</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I see elsewhere online the claim is that her mobile units were supposedly responsible for *examining* over 1M soldiers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:50:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Marie Curie Helped Save a Million Soldiers During World War I</title><link>http://theinstitute.ieee.org/tech-history/technology-history/how-marie-curie-helped-save-a-million-soldiers-during-world-war-i#comment-3420899852</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That was an interesting article, but the headline seems completely unsupported and unsupportable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While a fascinating innovation that likely saved lies, a couple hundred portable X-ray units are extremely unlikely to have "Save[d] a Million Soldiers."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:48:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Update: Why WWE Isn&amp;#8217;t Getting Involved In Hardy v Impact Situation</title><link>http://www.mandatory.com/wrestlezone/news/842725-update-why-wwe-isnt-getting-involved-in-hardy-v-impact-situation#comment-3322830478</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you read the actual contract, Section VI notes that IP-related stuff like characters, dialogue, etc. are owned exclusively by Impact *until* the agreement terminates and then the license becomes non-exclusive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I assume this is what the Hardy's are relying on, though litigating it will likely be expensive.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 14:47:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Better consumer education could help cut video piracy</title><link>https://betanews.com/2017/03/09/consumer-education-video-piracy/#comment-3194981447</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"... after learning the damage that piracy causes to the media industry."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;LOL&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 14:29:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: U of California, Berkeley, to delete publicly available educational content</title><link>https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/03/06/u-california-berkeley-delete-publicly-available-educational-content#comment-3189432359</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The output of these system is not accurate enough to meet the accessibility requirements under the ADA, according to the DOJ.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 13:25:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: U of California, Berkeley, to delete publicly available educational content</title><link>https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/03/06/u-california-berkeley-delete-publicly-available-educational-content#comment-3189425067</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Most of it seems to be the result of automated lecture captures systems (like this &lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVB0F7kORII)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVB0F7kORII)"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/wat...&lt;/a&gt;, so the $2 million is probably closer. Plus you need to pay someone to manage that process.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 13:21:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: U of California, Berkeley, to delete publicly available educational content</title><link>https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/03/06/u-california-berkeley-delete-publicly-available-educational-content#comment-3189411452</link><description>&lt;p&gt;50,000 minutes is way too low of an estimate...at $2/minute, Berkeley is likely looking at $4-8 million to comply with the order.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 13:13:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why security will always be a people problem</title><link>https://betanews.com/2017/03/01/security-people-problem/#comment-3188439017</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We'll never have security because of asshats like this blaming users for the not figuring out how to work around the horribly insecure systems we make them use.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2017 21:33:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some early LG V20 buyers report fragile camera glass, best to leave the protective film installed</title><link>https://9to5google.com/2016/10/23/v20-fragile-camera-glass/#comment-2967446959</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Carriers like Verizon and T-Mobile releasing early...I got mine last week.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:25:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some early LG V20 buyers report fragile camera glass, best to leave the protective film installed</title><link>https://9to5google.com/2016/10/23/v20-fragile-camera-glass/#comment-2967446546</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Battery life is awful on my V20. Worse than the G4.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:24:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Abduction By Adoption | The Daily Caller</title><link>http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/18/abduction-by-adoption/#comment-2962782963</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This story makes zero sense as written. Writer needs to give more information or clarify why 18yo being adopted by step-father is an issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:40:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Please don't buy a Galaxy Note7, at least for now (returning yours is a good idea, too)</title><link>https://www.androidpolice.com/2016/10/08/please-dont-buy-a-galaxy-note7-at-least-for-now-returning-yours-is-a-good-idea-too/#comment-2940075282</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Related to this, after getting my Note 7 replacement, I and several others tried to sign up for Samsung's accidental damage plan which lists the Note 7 as an eligible device. Apparently they simply stopped selling it for the Note 7 after the initial round of fires. I doubt they will be offering it again for the device.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2016 15:09:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Please don't buy a Galaxy Note7, at least for now (returning yours is a good idea, too)</title><link>https://www.androidpolice.com/2016/10/08/please-dont-buy-a-galaxy-note7-at-least-for-now-returning-yours-is-a-good-idea-too/#comment-2940072513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm returning my replacement Note 7. I bought two fast wireless charging pads, an Otterbox case, several tempered glass screen protectors, etc. None will work on the phone I'm switching to (going to pre-order the LG V20).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With the Note 7, went from being the best phone I've owned to being a total white elephant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2016 15:07:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lucha Underground Season Three Premiere And Episode Two Viewership, Video Highlights, Full WMD Match</title><link>http://www.wrestlinginc.com/wi/news/2016/0916/617593/lucha-underground-season-three-premiere-and-episode-two/#comment-2901046701</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nothing ever does.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 00:08:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Still unwilling to return your Galaxy Note 7? Software update will soon limit battery charges | Pocketnow</title><link>http://pocketnow.com/2016/09/13/galaxy-note-7-software-update-limit-battery-charges#comment-2892604913</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That would have been the reasonable thing, especially as that was what T-Mobile said would happen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But instead manager said since I bought phone online through T-Mobile, I could not do exchange at T-Mobile store.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In general, employees at these stores don't seem to know much about the phones they sell (can't blame them) and receive mixed messages from corporate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When I called T Mobile directly to arrange for an exchange, first two CSRs I talked to had no knowledge of T Mobile's own announced exchange policy for the Note 7.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:46:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Still unwilling to return your Galaxy Note 7? Software update will soon limit battery charges | Pocketnow</title><link>http://pocketnow.com/2016/09/13/galaxy-note-7-software-update-limit-battery-charges#comment-2891819763</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Same thing here...T-Mobile store flat out *refused* to take my Galaxy Note 7 on Saturday. This is about carrier and Samsung incompetence, not end user misinformation or laziness.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briancarnell</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:09:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>