<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for bratling</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/bratling/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/bratling/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 10:29:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Best Smart Smoke Alarm</title><link>http://thewirecutter.com/reviews/best-smart-smoke-alarm/#comment-6749432292</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am surprised and disturbed to see you recommend Kidde, because for years now  &lt;a href="https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-basic-smoke-alarm/#the-competition" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-basic-smoke-alarm/#the-competition"&gt;The Wirecutter has recommended AGAINST any Kidde products&lt;/a&gt;  due to their pattern of multiple recalls of smoke alarms and fire extinguishers:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-basic-smoke-alarm/#the-competition" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-basic-smoke-alarm/#the-competition"&gt;https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-basic-smoke-alarm/#the-competition&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The $12 million fine they paid for deceiving the Consumer Product Safety Commission does not inspire confidence that their company culture is actually about safety and quality.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With the combination of that track record, and The Wirecutter's own condemnation of Kidde, I don't see how you can possibly recommend their product here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 10:29:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Webcams</title><link>http://thewirecutter.com/reviews/the-best-webcams/#comment-5517014517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been using Reincubate Camo for the past year. It's fantastic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 16:21:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why All Printers Suck (Even the Best Ones)</title><link>https://thewirecutter.com/blog/why-all-printers-suck-even-the-best-ones/#comment-2900755674</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good rant. I've come to like Canons. I don't print photos often, perhaps every four to six months, but when I do I don't want to screw with the printer. Epson and HP both are guaranteed to have clogged heads. Canon always works for me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 19:16:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why All Printers Suck (Even the Best Ones)</title><link>https://thewirecutter.com/blog/why-all-printers-suck-even-the-best-ones/#comment-2900753961</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Based on your requirements of charging you what it costs, I recommend the $500 Canon Pixma Pro-10 or the $800 Epson SureColor P600. :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 19:15:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MINI USA January Year-on-Year Monthly Sales Rise 0.4%</title><link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2016/02/02/mini-usa-january-year-on-year-monthly-sales-rise-0-4/#comment-2725654544</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Gabe – the sales chart there is for BMW models, not MINI. Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2016 19:22:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MINI USA Is Tweaking its Free Maintenance Program for 2017</title><link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2016/01/11/mini-usa-is-tweaking-its-free-maintenance-program-for-2017/#comment-2463569081</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not the full wiper assembly. Just the rubber insert. They retail for about $6 each: &lt;a href="http://www.minipartsmass.com/partlocator/index.cfm?action=MorePartInfo&amp;amp;PartID=876580&amp;amp;siteid=215989&amp;amp;catalogid=7659" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.minipartsmass.com/partlocator/index.cfm?action=MorePartInfo&amp;amp;PartID=876580&amp;amp;siteid=215989&amp;amp;catalogid=7659"&gt;http://www.minipartsmass.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 16:39:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MINI USA Is Tweaking its Free Maintenance Program for 2017</title><link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2016/01/11/mini-usa-is-tweaking-its-free-maintenance-program-for-2017/#comment-2461879971</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there anything left besides oil &amp;amp; filter now? This must be the new "Minimalism" that MINI keeps talking about.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2016 14:31:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MINI USA Is Tweaking its Free Maintenance Program for 2017</title><link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2016/01/11/mini-usa-is-tweaking-its-free-maintenance-program-for-2017/#comment-2461878649</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's the wiper blades that really exemplify penny-pinching at its worst. The rubber blade costs, what, maybe a few cents wholesale, and a couple dollars retail. Replacing those is really cheap goodwill for customers, and it's visible, unlike oil &amp;amp; filters.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2016 14:30:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 
      
        Microsoft, capitulation and the end of Windows Everywhere
      
    </title><link>http://ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2015/7/8/capitulation#comment-2204708445</link><description>&lt;p&gt;IBM is a poor choice. They got out of the PC business and thus aren't in the consumer eye, but they still make big piles of money on professional services, software, high end servers and mainframes. Sexy? No. Profitable and sustainable? Yes. IBM is a great example of a company that cedes a market (PC hardware) to others and finds its future in a combination of its heritage (high end servers and mainframes) and new models (systems architecture professional services).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 08:03:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 
      
        Microsoft, capitulation and the end of Windows Everywhere
      
    </title><link>http://ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2015/7/8/capitulation#comment-2204699231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Azure does have a lot of relevance to where Microsoft is headed. There are worse fates than providing ubiquitous, subscription based infrastructure to others. People often forget that Microsoft started out as a tools company, and added consumer products later. Tools are Microsoft's heritage, and under their new CEO, their future as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 07:55:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 
      
        Microsoft, capitulation and the end of Windows Everywhere
      
    </title><link>http://ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2015/7/8/capitulation#comment-2204693119</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thank you for clarifying. Your post made it seems that developing for windows phone was #3 "or perhaps even fourth".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 07:50:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 
      
        Microsoft, capitulation and the end of Windows Everywhere
      
    </title><link>http://ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2015/7/8/capitulation#comment-2204222329</link><description>&lt;p&gt;#3 is windows phone, after doing iOS and Android. It skips to #4 if the developer decides to do something else, such as a new project or even just improving the existing apps. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 22:43:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MINI Reboots its MINI Connected App With Less Functionality &amp;#038; More Sophistication</title><link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2015/08/03/mini-reboots-its-mini-connected-app-with-less-functionality-more-sophistication/#comment-2172396309</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whither Spotify?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2015 15:09:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ditch the Sidebar on Your Website and Increase Conversion Rates by 26%</title><link>https://videofruit.com/blog/website-sidebar/#comment-2126921805</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I see the sidebar is back this month. Are you still testing?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:42:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 
			Blog   |   Jun 4th, 2015
			Groundwater Monitoring is Key for Coal Ash Compliance
		</title><link>http://dev.trccompanies.com/resources/blog/groundwater-monitoring-is-key-for-coal-ash-compliance#comment-2122009093</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a test comment, because tests!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 15:23:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is This the New AWD JCW Clubman?</title><link>http://www.motoringfile.com/2015/06/22/is-this-the-new-awd-jcw-clubman/#comment-2095074923</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lease it. Give it back after 3-4 years. Then buy the one that has the bugs worked out. ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 13:53:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HipChat turns 3!</title><link>https://blog.hipchat.com/2013/01/25/hipchat-turns-3/#comment-792993639</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Still waiting on the real Mac client. Looking forward to it. (Or alternately, drop desktop clients entirely and go 100% web native on the desktop, using the Web Notifications API for notifications--notifications being the main reason I use the AIR client anyway. Save limited dev resources for web+mobile.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Despite my hate of AIR apps (AIR=cr*ppy on all platforms instead of good on any of them) —I love HipChat. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:33:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The cost of selling Galaxies</title><link>http://www.asymco.com/2012/11/29/the-cost-of-selling-galaxies/#comment-725039801</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Samsung does seem to have gone to great lengths to change its design to be anti-iPhone. A prominent pro-Android site even called out Samsung on it this past spring: &lt;a href="http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/05/04/the-samsung-galaxy-s-iii-the-first-smartphone-designed-entirely-by-lawyers/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/05/04/the-samsung-galaxy-s-iii-the-first-smartphone-designed-entirely-by-lawyers/"&gt;http://www.androidpolice.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 15:56:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How should we handle responsive images? | Boagworld – Web &amp; Digital Advice</title><link>https://boagworld.com/dev/how-should-we-handle-responsive-images/?wt=2#comment-708544526</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi. Just tested this on iPhone 5 + Verizon LTE in the US. Same size image either way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:26:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Path uploads your entire iPhone address book to it's servers</title><link>http://mclov.in/2012/02/08/path-uploads-your-entire-address-book-to-their-servers.html#comment-432909239</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, come on, SHA-2 isn't that bad. No collisions, very secure, decently fast.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:35:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Macbook Air 2011 Review</title><link>http://thewirecutter.com/reviews/macbook-air-2011-review/#comment-407444665</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The quality of comments here is just astounding.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:41:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Solid Photo Printer</title><link>http://thewirecutter.com/reviews/epson-stylus-photo-r2000/#comment-407440739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Question: Has Epson finally beat the problem with the organics in their inks spoiling and clogging the print heads? I was a huge epson fan from the 80's into the early 00's, but about five years ago I went Canon. I only make photo prints a couple times a year. Epson's inkjets would work fine the first couple times, but after a year? Uncleanably clogged.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:35:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rats not responsible for black plague</title><link>http://www.zmescience.com/research/studies/black-plague-18082011/#comment-292595014</link><description>&lt;p&gt;[citation needed]&lt;br&gt;Interesting but how about a link to the source?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 16:52:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://html5boilerplate.com/commentarchive.html</title><link>http://html5boilerplate.com/commentarchive.html#comment-68242457</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How can average windows users even tell they suffer from bad typography? It's so bad to start with… &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:49:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SproutCore Blog - How SproutCore Makes Your App Run Faster</title><link>http://blog.sproutcore.com/#comment-61275084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, it *is* optimized around consuming content. Why does that mean you can't create? Sheesh. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bratling</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 08:57:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>