<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for bradwagner</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/bradwagner/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/bradwagner/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:24:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: VMware Launches vSphere</title><link>http://www.mikedipetrillo.com/mikedvirtualization/2009/04/vmware-launches-vsphere.html#comment-8560564</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed.  Thanks, Mike.  Just amazing how often we run into these in the field. Or even SRM, or Lab Manager (not as often, yet..)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradwagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:24:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VMware Launches vSphere</title><link>http://www.mikedipetrillo.com/mikedvirtualization/2009/04/vmware-launches-vsphere.html#comment-8560227</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Might be some possible areas for minor clarification: Like what "no extra charge – it is all free" means if you want the attractive Host Profiles, Large CPUs/Mem or vSwitch features.  Perhaps "nearly free"....  Also the "upgrade NOW" might benefit from a caveat to look at the vsphere-migration-prerequisites-checklist.pdf for VMware products not yet supported, or all of the servers they may have to upgrade first (64-bit only), no 2.5 in env, etc.   Might also recommend healthy burn-in and testing as usual for a major 'OS' upgrade.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Don't get me wrong, I am very optimistic about the new launch, there are quite a few features customers have been asking for for quite some time; just want to be sure normal sanity is applied :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradwagner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:07:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>