<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for bobregan</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/bobregan/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/bobregan/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 07:16:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A conversation with Christian Vande Velde: Still looking ahead</title><link>http://velonews.competitor.com/2011/08/news/a-conversation-with-christian-vande-velde-still-looking-ahead_187259#comment-281128019</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I met Christian once several years ago.......great guy!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 07:16:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Report: Former Postal rider confesses EPO use, then recants</title><link>http://velonews.competitor.com/2011/08/news/report-former-postal-rider-confesses-epo-use-then-recants_186816#comment-278232386</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What's Floyd Landis up to these days, any how?? What's a disgraced ex pro cyclist do to make money?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 07:12:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cadel Evans confirmed for Colorado stage race</title><link>http://velonews.competitor.com/2011/07/news/cadel-evans-confirmed-for-colorado-race_186510#comment-269298102</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think a fight between Armstrong and Hamilton in the parking lot to settle the whole thing would have been hysterical.How do two guys with no upper body muscle mass fight, anyway?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:37:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: State Department action on 'LGBT rights' could split Catholic countries :: Catholic News Agency (CNA)</title><link>http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/state-department-action-on-lgbt-rights-could-split-catholic-countries/#comment-239732803</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Satan is active in our current administration. Pray, pray, pray.Of course, silence from our Obama supporting media asking why we are interfering in such a way with other countries.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:35:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Tyree:  Gay Marriage Will Lead To 'Anarchy'</title><link>http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/david-tyree-gay-marriage-will-lead-to-anarchy-20110616-ncx#comment-229263820</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whether it's homo or hetero anal sex, both are wrong and against nature. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 09:12:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Tyree:  Gay Marriage Will Lead To 'Anarchy'</title><link>http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/david-tyree-gay-marriage-will-lead-to-anarchy-20110616-ncx#comment-229125636</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Boy...did you misread my post!&lt;br&gt;Gay sex is a distortion and perversion of the true intent and purpose of male and female sexual organs and the sexual act, which is reproduction. The fact that male/female intercourse can produce life (a baby) makes it a pretty darn important function, wouldn't you agree?  Sorry S-N-M, but when you perform gay sex you will never be able to bring life in to this world. The covenant of marriage is a vow between the male and female couple to raise and nurture the baby which is the fruit of their physical/sexual bond. A gay couple can never achieve this. Also, man and woman (husband and wife) bring complimentary gifts, skills and emotional benefits to the nurturing, raising and development of a child that a gay couple never can. A child having two fathers can never bring or fulfill to the child the emotional needs  that a mother can. The same with a lesbian couple........the child will be missing the important impact of what a father brings. Sorry again S-N-M.......these are just facts of nature that can not change. You can try to distort, manipulate, bend and pervert what nature intends, but it won't work. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;It still boggles me that how hard gays fought in Canada for the right to marry, and now that it is legal, only 17% of gays get married (versus 75% of heterosexuals get married)? Massachusetts has gay marriage........why aren't hundreds of thousands of gay Americans moving to Massachusetts to get married, if it's that important? Maybe most gays realize that they cannot fulfill the basic tenent of marriage, reproduction?? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 06:01:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Tyree:  Gay Marriage Will Lead To 'Anarchy'</title><link>http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/david-tyree-gay-marriage-will-lead-to-anarchy-20110616-ncx#comment-228808423</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sodomy is a distortion and perversion of what the male and female sexual organs primary and natural function  and complimentariness is: the physical union of a man and a woman with the possibility f reproduction.Gay sex can never fulfill this, and therefore is a perversion of the real, natural intent of the sexual act.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:34:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Tyree:  Gay Marriage Will Lead To 'Anarchy'</title><link>http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/david-tyree-gay-marriage-will-lead-to-anarchy-20110616-ncx#comment-228782190</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The bottom line is the gay community wants the act of sodomy to be accepted, licit, and therefore moral. None of the arguments against gay marriage has to do with bias or bigotry...that's a smokescreen done by the gay community.It has everything to do with the sexual acts of sodomy being against the natural law and the intended primary function of male/female sexual organs, which is reproduction. When a heterosexual couple performs anal sex that too is immoral and against the natural law. The openness to reproduction in the sexual union of a male and female is the physical union of the couple that greatly defines what it is to "be married."  They have committed and vowed themselves to raise the potential offspring together. The other is the unitive emotional bonding and complimentariness of man and woman during the sexual act where they are giving fully of themselves.  The gay couple can never fulfill these basic tenents of what marriage is. The distorted "union" in gay sex is just that.....sex. There is no complimentary bonding both physically and emotionally. There is no primary function according to nature of possible reproduction. Gay sex is a distortion 9or perversion, if you will) of what nature truly meant for the sexual act.&lt;br&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:03:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Tyree:  Gay Marriage Will Lead To 'Anarchy'</title><link>http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/david-tyree-gay-marriage-will-lead-to-anarchy-20110616-ncx#comment-228583817</link><description>&lt;p&gt;good question........but as you see in my posting that sociologic science shows growing up in a gay household increasing dramatically the chances of gender confusion in the reared child.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:54:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Tyree:  Gay Marriage Will Lead To 'Anarchy'</title><link>http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/david-tyree-gay-marriage-will-lead-to-anarchy-20110616-ncx#comment-228570642</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Also......&lt;br&gt;5. Evidence suggests children raised by homosexuals are more likely to experience gender and sexual disorders.&lt;br&gt;Although the evidence on child outcomes is sketchy, it does suggest that children raised by lesbians or homosexual men are more likely to experience gender and sexual disorders. Judith Stacey-- a sociologist and an advocate for same-sex civil marriage--reviewed the literature on child outcomes and found the following: "lesbian parenting may free daughters and sons from a broad but uneven range of traditional gender prescriptions." Her conclusion here is based on studies that show that sons of lesbians are less masculine and that daughters of lesbians are more masculine.&lt;br&gt;She also found that a "significantly greater proportion of young adult children raised by lesbian mothers than those raised by heterosexual mothers ... reported having a homoerotic relationship." Stacey also observes that children of lesbians are more likely to report homoerotic attractions.&lt;br&gt;Her review must be viewed judiciously, given the methodological flaws detailed by Professor Nock in the literature as a whole. Nevertheless, theses studies give some credence to conservative concerns about the effects of homosexual parenting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:41:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Tyree:  Gay Marriage Will Lead To 'Anarchy'</title><link>http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/david-tyree-gay-marriage-will-lead-to-anarchy-20110616-ncx#comment-228568865</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And some science why children need mothers:&lt;br&gt;Although homosexual men are less likely to have children than lesbians, homosexual men are and will be raising children. There will be even more if homosexual civil marriage is legalized. These households deny children a mother. Among other things, mothers excel in providing children with emotional security and in reading the physical and emotional cues of infants. Obviously, they also give their daughters unique counsel as they confront the physical, emotional, and social challenges associated with puberty and adolescence. Stanford psychologist Eleanor MacCoby summarizes much of this literature in her book, The Two Sexes. See also Steven Rhoads' book, Taking Sex Differences Seriously.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:40:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Tyree:  Gay Marriage Will Lead To 'Anarchy'</title><link>http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/david-tyree-gay-marriage-will-lead-to-anarchy-20110616-ncx#comment-228566735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Some scientific facts why children need fathers:&lt;br&gt;If same-sex civil marriage becomes common, most same-sex couples with children would be lesbian couples. This would mean that we would have yet more children being raised apart from fathers. Among other things, we know that fathers excel in reducing antisocial behavior and delinquency in boys and sexual activity in girls.&lt;br&gt;What is fascinating is that fathers exercise a unique social and biological influence on their children. For instance, a recent study of father absence on girls found that girls who grew up apart from their biological father were much more likely to experience early puberty and a teen pregnancy than girls who spent their entire childhood in an intact family. This study, along with David Popenoe's work, suggests that a father's pheromones influence the biological development of his daughter, that a strong marriage provides a model for girls of what to look for in a man, and gives them the confidence to resist the sexual entreaties of their boyfriends.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:38:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Tyree:  Gay Marriage Will Lead To 'Anarchy'</title><link>http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/david-tyree-gay-marriage-will-lead-to-anarchy-20110616-ncx#comment-228511146</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It will be interesting to see how many gay couples take advantage of the law if allowed to marry. Once again, in Canada, only 17% take advantage of the legal right to marry. I read a stat once that the active gay man has on average 50 sexual partners in a lifetime. It seems to me that the main focus in a gay relationship might be the sex, and there is lacking any unitive, bonding love that only a man and a woman can share. One can't deny the complimentariness (or "joining") of a man and a woman both physically and emotionally. Two men together can not have the same complimentariness, whether sexual or emotional. That's a basic fact of nature. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:58:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Tyree:  Gay Marriage Will Lead To 'Anarchy'</title><link>http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/david-tyree-gay-marriage-will-lead-to-anarchy-20110616-ncx#comment-228397713</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But once again, if we're redefining the definition of marriage, why should it only be redefined as your definition,  between "consenting adults?" Then can "consenting adults" include a man marrying his sister? Or marrying his aunt? and who says your definition is the correct one, and someone elses definition is incorrect? Once we redefine marriage to include other groups, then it becomes a relativistic argument.All definitions are legit. What's right for you is right for you. What's right for me is right for me. In all seriousness, I read of a woman that wants to legally marry an F-15 Eagle Fighter jet. No kidding. Once we redefine marriage to anyone's definition...........why then can't she marry the jet?? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:09:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Tyree:  Gay Marriage Will Lead To 'Anarchy'</title><link>http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/david-tyree-gay-marriage-will-lead-to-anarchy-20110616-ncx#comment-228372372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Incorrect, David! separation of Church and State was actually meant to keep the federal government from interfering (or oppresing) a particular religion, Non religous arguments: if gay marriages are legal and acceptable, then should all marriages be acceptable (polygamy, for example)? If marriage can be "redefined" then couldn't it be redefined for all groups based upon their personal decision and desires (see my posted reply above)?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:45:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Tyree:  Gay Marriage Will Lead To 'Anarchy'</title><link>http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/david-tyree-gay-marriage-will-lead-to-anarchy-20110616-ncx#comment-228348417</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where Schariah is legitimate is when he states that the bible does condemn it. Look in Genesis 1-2, 2:24, 5, 19:24-28. Also 2Peter 2:6-10, 1Corinthians 6:9, amongst several places. and for 2000 years the apostolic teaching has always said sodomy is a sin. I don't agree with the harshness of his tone, his reasonable and rationality is why redefine something (marriage) that should not (and can not) be redefined? And let's play slippery slope...........if gays can redefine marriage, why can't polygamists redefine marriage? Or people engaged in beastiality, why can't the redefine marriage as being between a man and a dog? The North American Man/boy (NAMBA) society has already said that if marriage is redefined as to include man-man, woman-woman, they will lobby state laws to have it include man-boy. what's good for the goose is good for the gander. If gays are allowed at the table, then you can not be exclusive, all groups are allowed at the table. If gay groups say that man-boy cannot marry or man-dog can not marry, then aren't they being........dare I say........biggotted??!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:05:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Tyree:  Gay Marriage Will Lead To 'Anarchy'</title><link>http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/david-tyree-gay-marriage-will-lead-to-anarchy-20110616-ncx#comment-228293143</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why when pro-gay marriage people don't have an answer to the legitimate, reasonable, and rational, laws of nature arguments against gay marriage, they're only response is "you're a bigot!"??? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:42:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Tyree:  Gay Marriage Will Lead To 'Anarchy'</title><link>http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/david-tyree-gay-marriage-will-lead-to-anarchy-20110616-ncx#comment-228270269</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The interesting fact is what has happened in Canada, which legalized gay marriage about ten years ago. While 75% of heterosexuals in Canada get married, only 17% of professed homosexuals (or those that live the gay lifestyle) get married. Why is this? Some believe it is because the homosexual tendency has at its core only to do with sexual attraction and the act of sodomy, not any unitive or bonding act of love. homosexuals want to keep their options open in the event they want too move on to a new sexual partner. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:05:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Tyree:  Gay Marriage Will Lead To 'Anarchy'</title><link>http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/david-tyree-gay-marriage-will-lead-to-anarchy-20110616-ncx#comment-228264261</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The liberal media will attack Tyree on the word "anarchy" and not debate him on the substance of his argument, that gay marriage is against the natural law and God's will. Christian's should flat out say the reason gay marriage is immoral is because at its core is the act of sodomy, which scripture and tradition has always taught is a grave and mortal sin. The more one leans towards the Truth in the gospels, the more secular society will push back. God bless you David. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:59:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Explainer: Intimidation might be in the eye of the beholder (but the feds make the call)</title><link>http://velonews.competitor.com/2011/06/news/the-explainer-intimidation-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder_178739#comment-228117434</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Armstrong's a disgrace, I've had enough of him. He obviously stalked Hamilton in this situation to confront him. Someone needs to take Lance in to a back alley and give him a very long diservered arse whuppin'. Maybe he'll finally become a man and admit to lieing over the doping issue. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:03:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/walk_for_life_west_coast_turnout_looking_big/</title><link>http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/walk_for_life_west_coast_turnout_looking_big/#comment-145001949</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In yesterday's Philadelphia Inquirer there was an editorial about the high level of pregnancies in the African American community that end in abortion. 39% of all pregnancies in this community in Philadelphia(almost 4 out of 10 babies) ends in an abortion. These numbers are simply amazing and chilling.With the inauguration of the first African American president, where is the outcry to Obama from the African American ministers/pastors? Attending a local Right to Life march and rally yesterday, there was not one African American minister or lay person attending. Where are they and why such silence? There should be a constant full court press from all of us to the new president to end legalized aportion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:30:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GE subsidiary to use human embryonic stem cells for drug testing</title><link>http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/ge_subsidiary_to_use_human_embryonic_stem_cells_for_drug_testing/#comment-144948398</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great, the excuse to kill human embryos now is to save lab rats from suffering.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:09:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obamas embryonic stem cell decision ignored pro-life Democrats</title><link>http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/obamas_embryonic_stem_cell_decision_ignored_prolife_democrats/#comment-144931041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pro-life Democrats need to declare war on this culture of death President, and take back the Democratic Party as the Pro-Life Party. Enough is enough. I am convinced Obama is not Christian at all. Notice how you don't hear of him attending any church at all on Sundays? There was always film of Bush (even Clinton) leaving church on Sundays. He's in Washington now over two months and nothing onhis (supposed) Christian faith?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:45:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pelosi attempts to justify funding for contraception in economic stimulus package</title><link>http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/pelosi_attempts_to_justify_funding_for_contraception_in_economic_stimulus_package/#comment-144930725</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with Sissy, souls are being lost while Pelosi spews her immoral rhetoric and actions. The Catholic Church needs to take action and enter larger in to the fray and send a huge message and excommunicate Pelosi. She has been repeatedly warned. Once again, with her actions, babies are being lost.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the group, how do we justify paying FICA knowing the money goes towards abortions? "Render unto Ceasar", but what actions can be taken knowing our tax dollars fund abortions now? Any thoughts??&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:45:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Archbishop Chaput responds to Pelosi-Pope meeting</title><link>http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/archbishop_chaput_responds_to_pelosipope_meeting/#comment-144906427</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've read where Pelosi, even after her meeting with Pope Benedict, is still staunchly pro-abortion. If anyone knows....what happens now? Should her bishop publicly state that she should not receive Communion? Should she be publickly excommunicated? Any thoughts? I think some action should be taken. If we are to uphold as a faith the sacrednesss of the Eucharist, some type of statement should be made. If not, Catholics might think it's OK to receive the Body, Blood of Christ in a state of mortal sin.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobregan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:10:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>