<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for bobbravo2</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/bobbravo2/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/bobbravo2/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:01:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: WHMCS Addon Blog</title><link>http://whmcsaddon.com/blog/?p=67#comment-536038633</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What do you think is a good alternative to WHMCS? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobbravo2</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:01:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LAST CHANCE to Buy a RARE and HORNY Vintage Booty Tee!</title><link>http://unicornbooty.com/blog/2012/02/02/last-chance-to-buy-a-rare-and-flashy-vintage-booty-tee/#comment-317743599</link><description>&lt;p&gt;GIMME!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobbravo2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 18:10:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Hello. I&amp;#8217;m Shelly Duvall&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://unicornbooty.com/blog/2011/09/15/hello-im-shelly-duvall/#comment-315590017</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wait. I'm Shelly Duval?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobbravo2</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 22:14:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Edit this Fiddle - jsFiddle - Online Editor for the Web (JavaScript, MooTools, jQuery, Prototype, YUI, Glow and Dojo, HTML, CSS)</title><link>http://www.jsfiddle.net/davidThomas/wDSbT/#comment-262692208</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The function call needs to be wrapped in this.each() so that jquery iterates over multiple nodes if they are passed to the plugin. Also, the return $(this) is redundant, when you extend the jquery object, you are automatically passed the jquery object as this, so returning the plain this works just fine. Thanks for your work!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobbravo2</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 04:40:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 4 vs EVO 4G vs Nexus One Review</title><link>http://www.mwd.com/2010/06/iphone-4-vs-evo-4g-vs-nexus-one-review/#comment-58667461</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I went with the iPhone 4. Simply because it is an elegantly designed ecosystem. Apple fuses the hardware, software and cloud based services, into one coherent experience. There are quality apps, and there is a lack of "this phone doesn't support this app because it has: too small a screen/too slow/lack of an accelerometer" because there is only 1 iPhone, revised every year. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My only gripe so far, is that I have to wait on 3rd party developers to update their apps to take full advantage of iOS4's multitasking APIs. Big plus for me however, is that the two apps that I use most, and require to have the most multitasking ability, were updated before I purchased the phone: Pandora &amp;amp; TomTom.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobbravo2</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:33:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is the future for joomla? | Joomla GPS - brian.teeman.net</title><link>http://brian.teeman.net/joomla-gps/what-is-the-future-for-joomla.html#comment-11392317</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With a clearly communicated vision joomla could easily become the most flexible &amp;amp; robust CMS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My vision for Joomla:&lt;br&gt;-Refactor the IA to include multi-level categories &amp;amp; tagging&lt;br&gt;-Completely redesign the UX - Jquery/mootools based AJAX backend. The backend needs to have a very clear conceptual model that relates to the way the information will be presented. One of the biggest problems is that I frequently have to figure our what a radio button does by "trial and error = try this, save, refresh the frontend" &lt;br&gt;-Make the core bare essentials with a clear purpose - let 3rd party developers extend (they're better @ it anyways) &lt;br&gt;-Have 2 Joomla! versions - one that had current functions (a "starter pack") &amp;amp; 1 with bare minimal ("expert pack")&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My main problem is that the current generation of Joomla! suffers from terrible usability - As a frequent admin &amp;amp; designer, I frequently have to (re)remember how to get stuff done in Joomla. I cannot expect my clients to be able to figure out how to use Joomla, I have to make tutorial videos to explain the frontend! The Backend is even more confusing and I think that it was OK 3 years ago - but it is time to see a new paradigm in Joomla usability. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobbravo2</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:48:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: App of the Week: Microsoft Windows Live Search for Windows Mobile - mediabistro.com: MobileAppsToday</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/mobileappstoday/app_of_the_week/app_of_the_week_microsoft_windows_live_search_for_windows_mobile_105875.asp#comment-6616246</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've had problems with it not connecting to my data plan - it says "Check your data connection" and upon checking - I find that I have a fully functional internet connection - WLS just doesn't connect...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;OVERALL - This is a GREAT APP! Very usable and useful - I have been missing it now that it won't connect to MS Servers&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobbravo2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:50:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Joomla 1.6 SEF: Smarter than humans</title><link>http://blog.joomlatools.com/2008/11/joomla-16-sef-smarter-than-humans.html#comment-6395712</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the first 2 option should definitely be re-written to be more clear. Even perhaps include a javascript demo of what a URL will look like underneath. Have it changed based on URL rewriting ON/OFF.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for adding logic to determine if index.php is necessary - that could be done when the SEF urls are toggled ON/OFF.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobbravo2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:38:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>