<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of bluelagoons</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/bluelagoons/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/bluelagoons/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:44:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Obama slammed at liberal conference</title><link>(u'http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jun/17/obama-slammed-liberal-conference/',%20229489882L)#comment-229489882</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great points, lespenis:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  As we all know, the Republican party plank includes elimination of:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Public education (not true)&lt;br&gt;  Pell grants (not true)&lt;br&gt;  Aid to the poor (not true)&lt;br&gt;  Aid to the homeless (not true)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Yep, you're at least consistent - consistently wrong!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:26:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Changing Tides: Research Center Under Fire for 'Adjusted' Sea-Level Data</title><link>(u'http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/06/17/research-center-under-fire-for-adjusted-sea-level-data/',%20229497780L)#comment-229497780</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No, actually, greggjohns, the adjustment makes no sense whatsoever.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let's extend the disengenuous approach employed by the "researcher:"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Assume land "rebounds," rising 1 foot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Assume water (sea) level rises 1 foot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  The net impact of these two changes to the shoreline, to inhabitability, to human experience? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Yep, zero.  Zip.  Nada.  Nothing.  Not of any concern whatsoever.....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  But, were one, say, just for instance, an ideologically-driven radical endorsing ever-greater governmental control by exaggerating the "huge, imminent, threatening" spectre of AGW, one would report half-truths just as the researcher in question has done.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;  No doubt, you consider that a mere coincidence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Carry on in your credulous belief in the impartiality of those who receive hundreds of millions of grand dollars, and endless laudatory publicity, for trumpeting the imminent global catastrophe that will ensue unless we all just cede greater control to the government.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Bozo.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  - Snark&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:36:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama Miracle is White House Free of Scandal: Jonathan Alter - Bloomberg</title><link>(u'http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-10-27/obama-miracle-is-white-house-free-of-scandal-commentary-by-jonathan-alter.html',%20417492325L)#comment-417492325</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Alter - living in the liberal echo-chamber inhabited by so much of the MSM.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Yep, a thick coat of white paint, a blind eye, and a little imagination makes this a "Miracle" scandal-free administration.....except for, among other things:&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;  - The MULTIPLE tax cheats appointed&lt;br&gt;  - Solyndra debacle - pressure from administration leads to subversion of vetting process and utter waste of over $500 Million of tapayers' monies - all to benefit - coincidentally, of course, Obama campaign bundlers&lt;br&gt;  - LightSquared - in which administration officials attempt to pressure experts (including a flag officer in our military) to change their testimony involving a company tied to....yep, you guessed it, a major Obama campaign supporter&lt;br&gt;  - Fast and Furious - no biggie; the bungling administration fostered sale of weapons to Mexican drug lords, leading directly to murder of at least one American official&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;  Yep, the admin is "scandal-free" - so long as one ignores the huge, obvious, and despicable actions of that same administration.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;  Anyone out there left to wonder which way JA leans politically? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 12:01:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Authorship of Obama's own love letters disputed</title><link>(u'http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/authorship-of-obamas-own-love-letters-disputed/',%20531093105L)#comment-531093105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps this explains why Obama is so enormously arrogant - it's a form of self-defense given that he knows himself to be an utter fraud.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hmmmm....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:29:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Witness: Trayvon Martin Attacked George Zimmerman 'MMA Style'</title><link>(u'http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/18/Trayvon-MMA-style-attack',%20533569521L)#comment-533569521</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your response is absurd....simply absurd.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Imagine you and I are on a street.  I come up to you, apropos of nothing at all, and ask you why you're there, where you're going.  Perhaps I am unkind, even confrontational. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In response, you knock me to the ground, straddle me, and begin battering me.  You break my nose, and repeatedly bash my head against the sidewalk.  Finally, in self-defense, I shoot you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And your assertion is that the "only pertinent fact in such a case" is that you were "minding your own business" when I approached you. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Really?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;NOTE:  Your post assumes you know things that you simply do not know.  HOW do you know that Martin was mindng his own business?  Were you there? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My hypothetical scenario is NOT intended to replicate what happened in Florida - you don't know, and I don't know what actually happened there.  I'm simply pointing out that your post is nonsensical. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Perhaps you're simply blinded by race or political ideology?  If you had a son, can I guess whom he'd resemble?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 08:49:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DCCC fundraiser to honor 25 years since Barney Frank came out</title><link>(u'http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/house-races/229363-dccc-fundraiser-to-honor-25-years-since-barney-frank-came-out',%20538019725L)#comment-538019725</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...and in a similar vein, exactly 36 hours ago, I enjoyed an epic bowel movement.  Let's all celebrate, shall we? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:47:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Elizabeth Warren Stonewalls On Questions About Cherokee Ancestry | RealClearPolitics</title><link>(u'http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/05/24/elizabeth_warren_stonewalls_on_questions_about_cherokee_ancestry-comments.html',%20538022533L)#comment-538022533</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Q:  "Are you a member of a minority group?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A:  "Middle class families are getting hammered."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nice job of clear, concise, direct answer to a question made completely relevant and valid by Warren's flagrant (and successful) efforts to manipulate the liberal affirmative action spoils system. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;She's toast - and a good thing that is!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:53:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama is facing his Jimmy Carter moment</title><link>(u'http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/mitt-romney/9289994/Barack-Obama-is-facing-his-Jimmy-Carter-moment.html',%20540036618L)#comment-540036618</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Obama the moderate statesman..."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;WHAT?  Even for a libbie journalist (pardon the repetition) this is an absurdity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Obama's voting record during his short and utterly undistinguished time as a Senator?  HARDER LEFT than any other senator.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Obama's OWN WORDS during 2008 - "...fundamentally transform America..." &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;  and after the 2008 election:  "...don't do a lot of talkin'," "I won," "ride in the back," and on, and on.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Obama is neither a moderate (NEVER has been - was he a moderate when he was palling about with Ayers and Rev. Wright?) nor a statesman. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  What a pantload.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Vote RIGHT in 2012!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  - Snark&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 21:21:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Most Americans want full or partial overturn of health care law</title><link>(u'http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/jun/7/most-americans-full-partial-overturn-health-care/',%20550376648L)#comment-550376648</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a triumph - after two years in which the libbies controlled both executive and legislative branches, they managed to produce an enormous behemoth of a bill that a majority of Americans rejected - then, over time, and now.&lt;br&gt;That bill has already done grave harm; it's added substantially to the uncertainty that has stifled economic recovery.  It's furthered the crony capitalism AND crony socialism practiced by this incompetent administration; the latter is evident in the distribution of "get out of Obamacare free" dispensations.&lt;br&gt;And, of course, after spending the better part of two years arrogantly maneuvering to shove down Americans' throats this utter dog of an unconstitutional millstone, the Amateur has the chutzpah to call out "obstructionism" on the part of the House as the reason (along with tsunami, Europe, Bush, the euro, poison ivy, chancre sores, athlete's foot, mother-in-law visitation, and high humidity) as the reasons for his utterly failed policies.  &lt;br&gt;Vote RIGHT in 2012!&lt;br&gt;  - Snark&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 19:27:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Most Americans want full or partial overturn of health care law</title><link>(u'http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/jun/7/most-americans-full-partial-overturn-health-care/',%20550377785L)#comment-550377785</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, hey!&lt;br&gt;That's "Wise Latina" to you, Mister!&lt;br&gt;  - Snark&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 19:28:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel</title><link>(u'http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel',%20565443182L)#comment-565443182</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What?  The apocolyptic predictions of flooding, fires, famine, starvation, incineration, and the like were all simply hysterical bunk promoted by left-wing idologues and the ignorant?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well, I'll be.......who saw this coming?  (Other, that is, than all adults capable of thinking for themselves, and familiar with the leftists' pattern of crying "crisis" - and, over and over, proposing giant, intrusive, centrally-controlled government solutions necessary to save the world).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The unravelling of the AGW "crisis" was utterly predictable; Al Gore's overly tense second chakra never had me particulalry worried.....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 11:41:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel</title><link>(u'http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel',%20565443835L)#comment-565443835</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What? The apocolyptic predictions of flooding, fires, famine, starvation, incineration, and the like were all simply hysterical bunk promoted by left-wing idologues and the ignorant?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well, I'll be.......who saw this coming? (Other, that is, than all adults capable of thinking for themselves, and familiar with the leftists' pattern of crying "crisis" - and, over and over, proposing giant, intrusive, centrally-controlled government solutions necessary to save the world).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The unravelling of the AGW "crisis" was utterly predictable; Al Gore's overly tense second chakra never had me particulalry worried.....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 11:42:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel</title><link>(u'http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel',%20565445043L)#comment-565445043</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What? The apocolyptic predictions of flooding, fires, famine, starvation, incineration, and the like were all simply hysterical bunk promoted by left-wing idologues and the ignorant?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well, I'll be.......who saw this coming? (Other, that is, than all adults capable of thinking for themselves, and familiar with the leftists' pattern of crying "crisis" - and, over and over, proposing giant, intrusive, centrally-controlled government solutions necessary to save the world).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The unravelling of the AGW "crisis" was utterly predictable; Al Gore's overly tense second chakra never had me particulalry worried.....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 11:43:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel</title><link>(u'http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel',%20565448400L)#comment-565448400</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed....and all that you describe can be done without fearmongering, and huge government programs, and Al Gore's endless, tedious, pompous, self-aggrandizing globe-trotting in his private jet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In fact, left alone - that is, freed from endless government intrusion - the private sector WILL find a "better answer" - as has been amply demonstrated over, and over, and over.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 11:48:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel</title><link>(u'http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel',%20565450722L)#comment-565450722</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Standard fearmongering libbie response -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- that is, an ad hominum attack upon scientists that live in the real world, and deal with actual data.  Did you miss the part of the article that noted the failure of the alarmists' models to predict the decade-plus long absense of warming? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyone think it's a coincidence that a RETIRING scientist comes clean about the fraud of AGW alarmism?  After there's no further benefit in bilking the credulous and craven for further research grants, "his eyes were opened."  Huh - just a coincidence, I suppose...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 11:51:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel</title><link>(u'http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel',%20565650699L)#comment-565650699</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  "Who are 'the alarmists?"  The fact that you ask this question shows you to be profoundly ignorant or simply ideologically-blinded.  (I'll leave aside the possibility that you're incapable of actually understanding that those who've asserted flooding of coasts, mass starvation, mass failure of crops, etc., etc., ETC. are 'the alarmists.'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's always tough to dialogue with the ignorant, Dan, so I won't be responding to you further.  When you've managed to educate yourself (I should say "IF") we might exchange thoughts further.  In the meantime, you might consider educating yourself.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ponce.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  - Snark&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:56:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel</title><link>(u'http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel',%20566168155L)#comment-566168155</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mark-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Let's assume your statement "The evidence for the science that shows AGW when humans do what we are demonstrably doing is as firm as any other scientific endeavour"  is true (I don't believe it is, but I'll grant it in order to advance the following argument):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Name another scientific theory with equivalently "firm" support for which the advocates are running hither and yon screeching that "the science is settled." &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Only those unfamiliar with the scientific method make such assertions.....unless they've an agenda (e.g., advocating for huge governemental controls, and/or billions of dollars in research grants, and/or fradulently-granted taxpayers' monies - at least as long as the Amateur is in office).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Go ahead.  Cite a few other cases.  Are scientists running about declaring that "the science is settled" with regard to black holes?  String theory?  Sub-atomic particles?  The Big Bang?  Elvis' location?  No - hmmmm.....perhaps that's because scientific theories, like AGW are NEVER "settled."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; - Snark&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 16:39:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel</title><link>(u'http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel',%20566169946L)#comment-566169946</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don requires a listing of alarmists, by name.  Apparently, he's simply unaware of the worldwide, years-long, top-of-the-lungs, research grant grabbing assertions of flooding, crop failure, starvation, and on, and on.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One can only conclude that Don is either a hugely-ignorant teenager or a hugely-ignorant adult.  Well, Don, which is it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  - Snark&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 16:42:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel</title><link>(u'http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel',%20566172389L)#comment-566172389</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good one, Don!  Of course, you're likely the only individual on this thread so profoundly ignorant as to have had no exposure to the alarmists' "world will end unless we cripple western economies" mantra.   &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  There's nothing vague about those many, loud, well-publicized, worldwide, research grant- and carbon credit revenue-grabbing claims.  I decline to spend time listing what essentially everyone on this thread can easily find for him- or her-self, even you, Don.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only excess credit you're "giving" is to your own intellect - severely circumscribed though it is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  - Snark&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 16:45:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel</title><link>(u'http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel',%20566276998L)#comment-566276998</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Go ahead, you pimply teenaged ponce; live in your fantasy world.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Right - there's no alarmists....no absurd claims of horrible outcomes.  The fact that I haven't listed them for you means they don't exist.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; "Dealing in specifics" doesn't mean that I need provide a detailed list for you; you've lots of time, since you're living in your mommy and daddy's basement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Buh-bye, you teenaged ponce.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  - Snark&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 20:11:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: "Lee Iacocca endorses Romney for president"</title><link>(u'http://www.humanevents.com/2012/10/19/lee-iacocca-endorses-romney-for-president/',%20687909625L)#comment-687909625</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, LaQuan for your insightful, thoughtful, and on-topic response to a serious article.  You've done liberals a service everywhere by making clear just how intelligent, and how committed to mature discussion, you are. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 13:34:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vandal Keys ‘Obama’ Into 2 Cars In Alta Loma</title><link>(u'http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2012/10/27/vandal-keys-obama-into-2-cars-in-alta-loma/',%20694545993L)#comment-694545993</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I disagree with Sloan - I think the vandal(s) made their point very clearly.  Namely, that Obozo supporters have no respect for themselves, others, and their country.&lt;br&gt;Vote RIGHT in '12!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:24:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vandal Keys ‘Obama’ Into 2 Cars In Alta Loma</title><link>(u'http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2012/10/27/vandal-keys-obama-into-2-cars-in-alta-loma/',%20694580451L)#comment-694580451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Ralph Mcnertny" Has posted a dozen or so posts, empty of substance and thoughtful dialogue.  His comments DO include, however, such 'insights' as "You morons...  wingnut....fellow loons....scumbags....and so on (and on, and on!)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Ralph, for making abundantly clear the vacuity, immaturity, and ugliness of liberals everywhere.  You're your own wost enemy, though clearly lacking the perspicacity to recognize that fact.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sad, sad to be a libbie like Ralph.  Sad.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stand by for a national repudiation of liberalism, just as was administered nationwide in 2010.&lt;br&gt;- Snark&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 10:46:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PICKET: Al Gore blames Hurricane Sandy on 'global warming' </title><link>(u'http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2012/oct/30/picket-al-gore-blames-hurricane-sandy-global-warmi/',%20696662536L)#comment-696662536</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bloated Al Gore of the Overly-Tense Second Chakra.&lt;br&gt;What an unbelievable ponce.  Really, Al?  Take you millions from "global warming" huckersting and your private jet charters, and your absurdly-huge, energy-gobbling home, and shut UP, already.&lt;br&gt;Bloated Al - Ponce of the Year....er......Decade!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:19:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clinton asks Philadelphia crowd: &amp;#8216;Who wants a president who will knowingly, repeatedly tell you something he knows isn&amp;#8217;t true?&amp;#8217; [VIDEO]</title><link>(u'http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/06/clinton-asks-philadelphia-crowd-who-wants-a-president-who-will-knowingly-repeatedly-tell-you-something-he-knows-isnt-true-video/',%20701831864L)#comment-701831864</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is simply too rich.  Clinton - good God, man - just go away.  Please, just go away.  No one is asking you to spend time with Hillary.  That would be too painful a fate, even for an unprincipled, lying, exploitative, craven, libbie ponce like you.&lt;br&gt;But, please man, just go away!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Snarkasterous1</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:44:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>