<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for bluegum</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/bluegum/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/bluegum/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2016 05:04:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Turn it Off and On Again!</title><link>http://nibbles-and-bytes.co/2016/07/turn-it-off-and-on-again/#comment-2786218966</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a test comment! Yeah! :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2016 05:04:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Vector 3D Social Media Icon Pack 2012 Including New Twitter, StumbleUpon &amp;#038; Pinterest Icons</title><link>http://www.designbolts.com/2012/08/19/free-vector-3d-social-media-icon-pack-2012-including-new-twitter-stumbleupon-pinterest-icons/#comment-822621163</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks! These icons were just what I was after. I donated a few dollars as a thank-you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 01:34:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: See Through Tyres - Radical New Tyre Design Photographs</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/see-through-tyres.shtml#comment-804873474</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As anyone with even a halfway decent education would know, "tyre" is UK and Australian spelling and is perfectly legitimate. See:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://grammarist.com/spelling/tire-tyre/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://grammarist.com/spelling/tire-tyre/"&gt;http://grammarist.com/spell...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In future, you might want to do some basic research before you label someone ELSE as being an imbecile. Otherwise, you risk making a complete fool of yourself in public as you have done here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:12:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Distracting Beach Babes Facebook Malware Attack</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/distracting-beach-babes-facebook-malware.shtml#comment-662777795</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, I.T. I've now fixed the error.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:32:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eight Outboard Drug Runner Boat Photograph</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/drug-runner-boat.shtml#comment-645734079</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Spam"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:09:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Facebook Sick Baby Hoax - Baby With Brain Cancer </title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/baby-brain-cancer-facebook.shtml#comment-645693951</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, Avi, which is why I say the following in my article:&lt;br&gt;"If one of these hoaxes comes your way, please do NOT comment on the photo or the wall where the photo has been posted, as this just gives the hoax more unwarranted exposure because it puts the offending photo on to the news feeds of your Facebook friends. Instead, report the photograph to Facebook."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 05:45:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Advance Fee Scam - British National Lottery Promo Programme</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/british-lottery-promo-scam.shtml#comment-619779910</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is just another advance fee scam like the one I describe above.  Do not follow any links or reply.  See also:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.hoax-slayer.com/sms-lottery-scam.shtml" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.hoax-slayer.com/sms-lottery-scam.shtml"&gt;http://www.hoax-slayer.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 02:00:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Delta Air Lines Passenger Itinerary Receipt Malware Emails</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/delta-airlines-malware-email.shtml#comment-597806950</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dan the websites of the companies targeted in such scam often have scam info on their security page that includes a submission email address. Or you can send it to me via the info on my Contact page. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:36:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax-Slayer FAQ's</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/faq.html#comment-597773251</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bob,  there are contact links at the top and bottom of every page. And I answer dozens of questions a day via email and Facebook. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:03:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Useless Facebook Warning: 'Scammers Blocking Facebook Group Admins'</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/blocking-admins-fb-warning.shtml#comment-593801959</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jon, not sure what you mean. Perhaps you need to re-read  my article? I added the following info to the article months ago:&lt;br&gt;"That said, since I first published this article, admins and other Facebook users have suggested that the warning may be in fact be referring to another potential issue with how Facebook Groups work rather than the direct hijacking of Groups. If a spammer joins a group on Facebook and then blocks that group's Admin, the Admin will not be able to view the spammer's Facebook account, as would be expected. However, this block will also apparently stop the admin from seeing or removing posts that the spammer makes in the group. Thus, the spammer is then able to post his spam to the group, safe in the knowledge that the group admin will not be able to see or delete his posts."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 21:46:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Image of Police Officer Macing a Child</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/cop-macing-child.shtml#comment-577464188</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Cherie. I think you are misinterpreting the main purpose for this article. Hoax-Slayer is not a news site. I wrote this article in response to a great many questions from readers asking where in the US the incident happened and who the officer was. Thus, the main focus of the article is to correct the claims that it took place in the US and that the officer was unknown. Of course, this was heinous and cowedly act regardless of where it occurred. But, if the situation was reversed, and the incident had actually taken place in the US and a message began circulating that claimed that it took place in Brazil, then my brief analysis would have focused on that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 18:58:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Most Beautiful Horse in the World Image </title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/most-beautiful-horse.shtml#comment-576025803</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for the info, Jes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 06:43:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tommy Hilfiger Racist Comments to Oprah Winfrey Hoax</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/tommy-hilfiger-rumour.html#comment-569279333</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are taking nonsense, Maria. Tommy actually went on the show to debunk this stupid story once and for all. You can read about it here:&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.oprah.com/oprahshow/Memorable-Guests-and-Setting-It-Straight" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.oprah.com/oprahshow/Memorable-Guests-and-Setting-It-Straight"&gt;http://www.oprah.com/oprahs...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:29:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Protest Message - Dog Named 'Parrot' Shot by Police</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/dog-named-parrot-protest.shtml#comment-567418693</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nowhere did I say it was a hoax. It is not a hoax, as I very clearly state in in my article. "The incident described in the message did take place and the photograph is genuine."  So what is the point of you post?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 04:25:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Caged Pigs Protest Message</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/caged-pigs-protest-message.shtml#comment-567151340</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As you can very clearly see by the above example if you had bothered to look, the version I am discussing does NOT say that the picture was taken in China. The caption states "This very sad &amp;amp; disturbing photo was taken at a US factory farm."  So, no I did not get it wrong. While there may now be other versions that correctly identify where the photo was taken, this version, which was circulated all over Facebook several months back when I wrote the article, does not. So your criticism is meaningless and rather silly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:16:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gang Initiation Warning Hoax - Infant Car Seat Left On Roadside</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/infant-car-seat-gang-warning.shtml#comment-564269398</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In fact, "enquiry" is perfectly correct. I am Australian and us UK rather than American English.  Here, "inquiry" pertains to a formal investigation, while "enquiry" means to ask a question or seek information in a  less formal way. You are apparently unaware that there are many differences between US and UK spelling. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 02:33:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoax-Slayer FAQ's</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/faq.html#comment-556677614</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Hi David, Sorry about that. A configuration error on my part meant that newer articles were no being correctly indexed in the search engine. The problem has now been rectified.  Thanks for your feedback.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:05:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: See Through Tyres - Radical New Tyre Design Photographs</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/see-through-tyres.shtml#comment-552352455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"tyres" is UK spelling and is perfectly correct. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 17:33:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Issue 132 - June 2012 (1st Edition) - Page 9</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/132-9.shtml#comment-546811713</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Hi June,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The advertising on the page is supplied by Google Adsense. Exactly what ads are displayed depends on the location of the viewer and other factors. Google generally does a decent job of vetting their advertisers. However,  I will look into theissue. Thanks for the feedback.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 06:00:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: London Olympics 2012 Lottery Scam</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/london-olympics-lottery-scam.shtml#comment-540676852</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Indeed! :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 22:21:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boy Shot By Step Dad Charity Hoax</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/boy-shot-stepfather-text-message-hoax.shtml#comment-529774545</link><description>&lt;p&gt; PLEASE read the article above. The message is a hoax. the claims in the message are untrue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:09:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Legitimate:  'Reminder to Update Your Legacy Blogger Account' Email</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/legacy-blogger-message.shtml#comment-515750457</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not sure why you are saying that? The main references I have used in my article all lead to Google sites or Blogger sites. Only the first link - which is just for background info and confirmation - leads to a non Google website&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 22:27:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Warnings Claim Thousands May Lose Internet In July 2012</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/july-thousands-lose-internet.shtml#comment-512324126</link><description>&lt;p&gt; I link directly to the FBI website in my article:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/november/malware_110911" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/november/malware_110911"&gt;http://www.fbi.gov/news/sto...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:38:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Warnings Claim Thousands May Lose Internet In July 2012</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/july-thousands-lose-internet.shtml#comment-512243194</link><description>&lt;p&gt; This IS true. It has been very well documented on legitimate news websites as well as by government sources such as the FBI. Make no mistake,the warnings are valid.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:40:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unsubstantiated Warning - Johannesburg Freeways 'Complete Shutdown 25th April'</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/joburg-freeway-shutdown-warning.shtml#comment-500653949</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Cosatu is planning several rallies, marches, &lt;br&gt;demonstrations and night vigils at the offices of the South African &lt;br&gt;National Roads Agency Limited (Sanral) and the transport department &lt;br&gt;across the country from April 23." Nothing at all about a "A MASS SHUTDOWN OF THE GAUTENG FREEWAYS ", deliberate blocking of freeways etc. So, at this point, the story remains unsubstantiated. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hoax-Slayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:16:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>