<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for blueactiva</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/blueactiva/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/blueactiva/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 05:17:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Harvard Doc To Wikipedia: You&amp;#8217;re Not Playing Fair On Alternative Trauma Therapy</title><link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/2014/11/harvard-doc-to-wikipedia-youre-not-playing-fair-on-alternative-trauma-therapy#comment-1738290764</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So who is writing ""EFT has no benefit as a therapy beyond the placebo effect " has to prove it before giving air to the mouth: this is talking without knowing for personal interest. And also: there are 50 studies that proves the efficacy of Eft, what do you want more than that? This way of talking of Eft with the personal interest to sell medications that kills people is criminal!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blueactiva</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 05:17:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Harvard Doc To Wikipedia: You&amp;#8217;re Not Playing Fair On Alternative Trauma Therapy</title><link>http://commonhealth.wbur.org/2014/11/harvard-doc-to-wikipedia-youre-not-playing-fair-on-alternative-trauma-therapy#comment-1738276406</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am a psychologist and what is written in Wikipedia about Eft is a scandal. How can an affirmation like this "EFT has no benefit as a therapy beyond the placebo effect " be accepted by Wikipedia? Medications in psychological patients: this is the real poison, it is obvious that there are economical interests. These people are ruining lives of others for their economical shit interests. Shame, shame, shame! Let's stop them!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blueactiva</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 04:56:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Vantaggi Di Una Campagna Di Article Marketing - Articoli gratis</title><link>http://www.contenutigratis.net/art/motori-di-ricerca/5191/vantaggi-article-marketing.html#comment-16532831</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ho pubblicato in molti siti di CS  con successo e questo &lt;a href="http://ArticleMarketing-ComunicatiStampa.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="ArticleMarketing-ComunicatiStampa.com"&gt;ArticleMarketing-Comunicati...&lt;/a&gt; è quello con il quale ho avuto la peggiore esperienza. Dopo circa un mese non aveva pubblicato l'articolo (ne lo avevano messo tra quelli da revisionare) e quando ho scritto per chiedere informazioni, il Comunicato è stato cancellato.&lt;br&gt;Come dire pubblicare su questo sito significa vedere andare in fumo il proprio lavoro&lt;br&gt; S-C-O-N-S-I-G-L-I-A-T-I-S-S-I-M-O!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blueactiva</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:29:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>