Disqus - Latest Comments for billybob44

Re: Walmart’s Labor Problem: Limits to the Low-Road Business Model

billybob44 — Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:05:51 -0000

Yeah, he denied all the requests from Benghazi for help. And then he said "The death of 4 Americans is not optimal". This one of more "cover-up's" that happened under Obama's watch, remember the Fast & Furious thing where Obama claimed executive order for the papers. That way no one is held responsable. No one will be held responsable for this either.

Re: Walmart’s Labor Problem: Limits to the Low-Road Business Model

billybob44 — Sun, 28 Oct 2012 13:14:42 -0000

In case you didn't notice, it's "CORNPUTER PROGHAMMERS"! Besides, all MEProudLIBERAL has is a bunch of nonsense, but what do you expect from a LIBERAL who would vote for a compulsive LIAR?

Re: Walmart’s Labor Problem: Limits to the Low-Road Business Model

billybob44 — Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:22:25 -0000

I heard that they thought the people would be dead by the time help could get to them, so they decided not to put any others at risk. Guess they never heard of "LEAVE NO ONE BEHIND".

Re: Walmart’s Labor Problem: Limits to the Low-Road Business Model

billybob44 — Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:59:42 -0000

Where did they come up with that mob video story. In real time they saw the terrorists coming in with huge weapons and burning buildings and did nothing to help those people. I guess that's why they made up the story about the mob and video, so they could cover their asses.

Re: Walmart’s Labor Problem: Limits to the Low-Road Business Model

billybob44 — Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:01:59 -0000

8.) money to Fisker in Finland
9.) Green energy debachel
10.) Keystone pipeline
11.) No plan for the future (except same old, same old)

Re: Walmart’s Labor Problem: Limits to the Low-Road Business Model

billybob44 — Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:52:33 -0000

Obama has to deal with these things:
1.) Benghazi scandal
2.) Fast & Furious scandal
3.) Solyndra scandral
and:
4.) DOJ failing to obey LAWS
5.) DOJ suing states
6.) Healthcare tax issue
7.) "Financial Cliff" issue

Re: Walmart’s Labor Problem: Limits to the Low-Road Business Model

billybob44 — Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:24:04 -0000

People who are like MEProudLIBERAL had their genes passed on by people who are less then average. People who are LIBERAL don't use their heads and don't vote for who is BEST but who are LIBERAL. If they chose Adolph Hitler as the LIBERAL candidate they would vote for him.

Re: Walmart’s Labor Problem: Limits to the Low-Road Business Model

billybob44 — Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:59:20 -0000

Then these people who get fired should be happy to be rid of a job that pays POVERTY WAGES.

Re: Walmart’s Labor Problem: Limits to the Low-Road Business Model

billybob44 — Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:55:00 -0000

Don't you get it, Wal-Mart will just keep firing people! As long as they have tons of people looking for work, they will just hire new people. It's not like these are highly skilled jobs. No skill jobs get no skill wages. But you will figure it out when Obama bites you in the ass. Or are you one of those who act on emotion instead of facts? Bet your one of those who thinks that a couple of people walking out, means something!

Re: Walmart’s Labor Problem: Limits to the Low-Road Business Model

billybob44 — Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:30:29 -0000

If you want to see low wage, poverty wages, vote OBAMA. That's what we have had the past 4 years plus higher prices. And wait until 2014 when you have to buy insurance or pay a $2,000.00 fine.

Re: Walmart Strike Spreads – Walmart’s Retaliation Met with Defiance

billybob44 — Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:20:55 -0000

Wal-Mart is not the only busniess that is going to lower wage part-time employees because of Obamacare.

Re: Walmart’s Labor Problem: Limits to the Low-Road Business Model

billybob44 — Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:16:06 -0000

If Obama gets elected, I feel sorry for the young people. It is them who will have to pay over $75,000.00 dollars in taxes. Higher taxes for Obamacare and lower wages are to be had under Obama, if you can find a job at all. Will you be willing to put up with a $20 trillion debt. And higher gas prices and higher food prices as well.

Re: Walmart’s Labor Problem: Limits to the Low-Road Business Model

billybob44 — Mon, 15 Oct 2012 10:42:58 -0000

If you vote for Obama, remember you will be responsible for all the bad things that hppen in the future. Do you want 4 more years like the late 4 years? Over 8% unemployment and higher prices, then vote for Obama.

Re: Walmart Calls Out the Riot Police on Peaceful Protest for Walmart Workers

billybob44 — Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:12:12 -0000

How can non-union workers go on stike, they have no contract? When you go on stike without a union backing you, you are just a mob and can be FIRED. These workers are lucky if they got their jobs back. They complained about working 19 hours a day, yet they say they aren't making enough money and most Wal-Mart workers say they aren't getting enough HOURS. It seems strange to me that warehouse workers can't get equipment to lift 250 pounds, yet people in the stores get pallet jacks, a forklift and carts. Sounds like they are bitching just to make EXCUSES.

Re: Denver Denies Walmart Tax Subsidies

billybob44 — Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:52:13 -0000

Looks like the poor cannot find jobs because Denver Colorado people don't want a Wal-Mart store in their area. So what if the bosses have big cars and big salaries, they have earned their status, All people have to do is work hard and build up time and senority and they too can get big salaries. You say it's all about the money, but it seems that you say it's all about the poor peoples money too. If Wal-Mart didn't make a profit, what would be their insentive to stay in busniess? Would you run a busness without a profit? And then they wouldn't hire anyone.

Re: Walmart “Supporters” Paid Untraceable $100

billybob44 — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:55:20 -0000

UNION FACTS:

Today's unions are a multi-billion dollar per year industry, collecting more than $10 billion per year in union dues from workers.

The majority of today's union-represented employees never voted to become unionized but must pay the union or be fired from their jobs.

Union dues are used to finance the running of the union's business.

If you are represented by a union and live in one of 28 Non-Right-to-Work States, a union can order you to be fired from your job if there is a union (income) security clause in its contract.

A union does NOT have to represent you to your liking and, in fact, can legally refuse to process your complaint

As a union member, if you violate a union's rules (known as the union constitution), you can be placed on trial by the union. If you are found guilty at a union trial, the union can suspend your membership, expel you from the union, or fine you money.

A union's real bargaining power comes from its ability to call you and your co-workers out on a strike. While on strike, you cannot collect un-employment or a paycheck, but, they will give you 'picket line' pay, if you walk the picket line, unless they hire others to do the picketing.

http://online.wsj.com/artic......

A union can legally trade things you already have in order to get things the union wants in negotiations.

If the union calls you out on an economic strike, you cannot be fired. However, you can be replaced permanently by your employer.

Re: Walmart “Supporters” Paid Untraceable $100

billybob44 — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:53:26 -0000

[There is no UAW union]

Then, which union represents the Canadian Auto Workers, at Ford, and GM?

Re: Walmart “Supporters” Paid Untraceable $100

billybob44 — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:47:49 -0000

[Scab Nurses's]

What are SCAB nurses, but PEOPLE, who want to feed their families, without having to PAY for the priviledge, to some union thugs? They are just people who want to cut out 'the middleman'! You always talk about 'slave labor', but what are union members, but 'slaves' to the union, that decides WHO is allowed to work and who can't, unless the union gets it's CUT? Kind of sounds like the old mob insurance scams, where business owners had to pay to keep their business from being damaged! Now, unions tell business, you Pay or we'll 'shut you down', same old scam as the mob, just modernized!

Re: Walmart “Supporters” Paid Untraceable $100

billybob44 — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 23:39:18 -0000

But, you are starting to see what we meant, about WMW, when you first started posting. And, you are right, we don't need to insult him, he does a good job of it all by himself.

[I did it w/o even using one bad word or insult!]

Give it awhile, you might get to that point sooner or later!

Re: Walmart “Supporters” Paid Untraceable $100

billybob44 — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 23:31:13 -0000

Wonder why the union didn't hire unemployed union people to picket, that have run out of unemployment compensation? Now I remember, once you are unemployed, you are no longer a union member! The union would rather hire people at 'slave' minimum wages!

Re: Walmart Spending Millions to Avoid $7K Fine

billybob44 — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:07:55 -0000

Could be! Also, notice how he won't give ANY information about himself, except that he is a businessman who has Wal-Mart as a client. But, unlike any businessman I have ever known, he doesn't believe in 'personal responsibility' or a 'work ethic'; so I guess his employees can do anything they please and are able to blame others for their mistakes, he is 'high' on unions; usually something businessmen try to avoid, he also thinks employees (who he said need plenty of paid time off), are more important than customers; a thing most businessmen consider reversed, and lastly, he is favorable towards 'socialism', where a true businessman would be FOR 'capitalism'. He sounds MORE like a union plant! Wait, wasn't Russia called the Soviet UNION?

Re: Walmart Spending Millions to Avoid $7K Fine

billybob44 — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:36:46 -0000

[I wonder where this person grew up. Doesn't seem like it was America.]

Yeah, and what were his parents like, 'hippies' maybe? His views on everything seem to be the direct opposite of what America IS and what the American people believe in. Could it be that he is originally from a 'socialist' country and is reflecting the values he learned there? Once, he said that we elected our representitives to 'Rule Over' us, that's not what I was taught! And, then there is his interpretation of the Constitution! Also, he said he has never met anybody with values like Honesty, Personal Responsibility (he really goes off on that one), Work Ethic and Loyality, therefore, he must be from somewhere else, where these things are not practiced, maybe he made a midnight run across the southern border! But, then again, he could be from South Chicago!

Re: Walmart “Supporters” Paid Untraceable $100

billybob44 — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:27:55 -0000

And, who of the Union thugs on this blog are on the payroll?

As for the story, you have to remember that this claims to be in Chicago, the city where 'buying' politics is common practice. And, sometimes you have to fight fire with fire. You union thugs aren't the only ones allowed to 'buy' politicians.

[Truely Walmart is a dishonest organization.]

If Wal-Mart is dishonest, then unions are truely 'criminal' organizations. They may hire people to speak up for them, but at least they don't EXTORT wages and benefits from employers and they don't have the President in their back pocket. Take the EFCA, what is the employees 'free choice', when the union controls the outcome? After all, what exactly is wrong with employees exercizing their 'free choice' in a 'voting booth'? And, why should the 'cards' of 'former' employees be allowed to express the wishes of 'present' employees? Talk about something being dishonest!

Re: Walmart Spending Millions to Avoid $7K Fine

billybob44 — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:07:31 -0000

The main difference between US and HIM, is that we use 'facts' to prove our points, he just uses 'his opinion' and when that doesn't work, he resorts to name calling.

Re: Walmart Spending Millions to Avoid $7K Fine

billybob44 — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:51:55 -0000

Yeah, and to prove yourself innocent, would require 'personal responsibility', which he keeps putting down. I guess in HIS little world, if you are accused, it automatically makes you 'guilty'. Well, I accuse him of being a 'moron', so I guess it is up to him to prove that isn't true. And, so far, he hasn't don't a very good job of it. Even Newbie, was kind of on his side to begin with and defended him, then after WMW called him a bunch of names, even Newbie said WMW was a 'moron'. If this site were a court, WMW would surely be convicted of being a 'moron'.