<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for bernardmoon</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/bernardmoon/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/bernardmoon/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 12:48:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Andrea Mitchell Rips Obama Prayer Speech: After A Pilot Is Burned, "You Don't Lean Over Backwards And Be Philosophical" | Video | RealClearPolitics</title><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/02/08/andrea_mitchell_rips_obama_prayer_speech_after_a_pilot_is_burned_you_dont_lean_over_backwards_and_be_philosophical-comments.html#comment-1843972650</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can you post it on YouTube, so it's easier share with a wider audience?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 12:48:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Charge: 2012 TEACHER OF THE YEAR Took Teen Boy Into Her Home, Had Lots Of Sex With Him</title><link>http://dailycaller.com/?p=4461682#comment-1841695011</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pedophiles can be woman too, but this is often overlooked since most of our society looks at these boys as not victims versus if they were young girls.  Probably most of these woman were victims of abuse themselves.  I know woman who were raped as teens who scarred for life which such tendencies.  Our humanity can be dark and depressing if you only focus on these cycles of abuse.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2015 04:50:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SparkLabs Global invests $600k in Korea&amp;#8217;s MangoPlate</title><link>https://www.techinasia.com/sparklabs-global-invests-600k-koreas-mangoplate/#comment-1752760853</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Minor correction... SparkLabs Global Ventures is not HQed in Seoul.  It's HQed in Palo Alto, CA.  SparkLabs accelerator is a separate but affiliated entity HQed in Seoul, which might have caused the confusion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2014 08:22:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next Silicon Valley: 4 fastest growing startup cities in the world are Asian</title><link>https://www.techinasia.com/proof-that-next-silicon-valley-is-in-asia/#comment-1694780266</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's odd that CB Insights left out Seoul with 30,000 startups in 2014, 3 recent investments of $100M+ valuing those companies at over $1B (Coupang by Sequoia, Yello Mobile by Formation8, 4:33 Creative Lab by Tencent &amp;amp; LINE), and KaKao (leading messaging startup) acquiring Daum (public internet portal) to create a $10 billion market cap company.  All within this past year.  Seoul isn't even listed, so I guess they just didn't have the data on it.  Also I see that Stockholm missing, which is another huge mistake.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:52:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Next Silicon Valley</title><link>https://cbinsights.com/research/next-silicon-valley-data/#comment-1694767091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree.  It's odd that you are comparing whole metro areas, such as Shanghai (24M) and St. Louis (2.8M), to suburbs of 30,000 to 100,000 residents, such as Palo Alto, Los Altos, Santa Monica, and Cambridge.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:41:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 6 and Android value</title><link>http://ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2014/9/10/iphone6#comment-1583683518</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wondering if you use an Android phone?  I use both and just the lack of a back button alone on the iPhone drives me crazy (plus playing catch up: &lt;a href="http://bgr.com/2014/09/10/iphone-6-vs-android-specs/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bgr.com/2014/09/10/iphone-6-vs-android-specs/)"&gt;http://bgr.com/2014/09/10/i...&lt;/a&gt;. But if the iPhone gets a back button, then I would consider using it more than 20% of my phone time :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 23:54:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Silicon Valley can’t keep up with Korea’s financial revolution</title><link>http://thenextweb.com/asia/2014/03/22/silicon-valley-cant-keep-koreas-financial-revolution/#comment-1297637287</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Additional random data and these are stats from a over a year ago:  80% of mobile subscribers using mobile payment services, 38% percent of all daily Internet banking is over mobile, and over 10% substituting mobile payment services for their credit cards.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2014 13:28:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 6 reasons why Facebook didn’t pay enough for WhatsApp</title><link>http://thenextweb.com/facebook/2014/02/24/6-reasons-facebook-didnt-pay-enough-whatsapp/#comment-1260009937</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Minor correction in that it was KaKao that pioneered the platform play of messaging apps.  LINE and WeChat followed them.  Amusing side stories involved too  Such as WeChat's first 3 games it launched where exact copies of KaKao's first 3 successful games down to the same characters, which they didn't even change until some minor uproars.  The founder of KaKao was the CEO of NHN, LINE's parent company.  He left to rest and then think of his next thing, which became KaKao.  His old company followed and copied his playbook step by step, but became bigger since they went to Japan and abroad earlier than KaKao.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:17:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Julie Chen Plastic Surgery Confession: Before and After Pictures - Us Weekly</title><link>http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/julie-chen-reveals-she-got-plastic-surgery-to-look-less-chinese-see-the-before-and-after-pictures-2013129#comment-1041312231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Did she even get work on her eyes?  It just looks like thicker circles of makeup around them.  It's her NOSE that is changed.  She shaved a pound off of her NOSE.  And she's talking as if no one would notice that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 21:03:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech press is all about money</title><link>http://dave.smallpict.com/2013/08/30/techPressIsAllAboutMoney#comment-1024790508</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It won't be one super success since there have been many (i.e. Mark Cuban, Guitar Hero founders, etc.), but a majority which isn't going to happen any time soon.  What distributed financing models can replace the large chunks of capital that VCs provide?  There has been more angel activity, but to scale many companies still need larger chunks of capital.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 18:45:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:  Latest Data Kills The VC Myth Of  'Smart Money' </title><link>http://www.siliconvalleywatcher.com/mt/archives/2013/07/latest_data_kills_the.php#comment-985409040</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Numbers seem to be rising? I would research the industry surveys.  Hundreds have closed over the past few years.  I believe two years it dropped from 900+ to 700+, and last year I believe was a similar drop.  Many VCs have stated there is too much money in the industry.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, it would be interesting to see how the top 5, 10 and 20 performed to the overall industry.  I'm still assuming that the top 10 pick or get the best deals.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 02:35:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Planet TEDx</title><link>http://www.wired.com/business/2012/11/ff-tedx/#comment-714698370</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This article doesn't share cleanly on FB.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 03:41:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NASA &amp; ESA successfully test ‘interplanetary Internet’ connection</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2012/11/10/nasa-esa-interplanetary-internet/#comment-708706368</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Eh?  DARPA, which created the Internet, was under the military budget.  Maybe customize your comment to "fund all science driven projects"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:46:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Romney Leads Final Gallup Poll By 1 Point</title><link>http://50.56.28.37/election2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/11/mt-preview-107efdb4964e1e12e4821c1a6ca404b514339b71.php#comment-701575172</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, Gallup is biased... whatever.  Just because they don't fit into your narrative, bash them. That's mature... Gallup has predicted every presidential election besides two over the past 100 years.  They had Obama over McCain in 2008.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/111703/final-presidential-estimate-obama-55-mccain-44.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.gallup.com/poll/111703/final-presidential-estimate-obama-55-mccain-44.aspx"&gt;http://www.gallup.com/poll/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 02:00:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: America's 50 Best Cities</title><link>http://images.businessweek.com/slideshows/2012-09-26/americas-50-best-cities#comment-663761869</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why is Boeing written under Seattle?  It's HQ is in Chicago.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:29:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple-Samsung juror: ‘I could defend this if it was my patent.’</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2012/08/27/apple-samsung-juror-i-could-defend-this-if-it-was-my-patent/#comment-632157559</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I went by the article and didn't see the interview.  I don't have time to post a hundred comments being an Apple fanboy and bashing Samsung on a few dozen articles.  Thanks, dude.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:07:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple-Samsung juror: ‘I could defend this if it was my patent.’</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2012/08/27/apple-samsung-juror-i-could-defend-this-if-it-was-my-patent/#comment-631694817</link><description>&lt;p&gt; 460 patent? Uh-oh... someone or group rushed a decision.  so does this mean that he really thought Samsung should have won or did he just confuse which company he was deciding on or which patent was owned by whom?  Uh-oh... there's big trouble for the next court to sift through this mess.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In hindsight, maybe patent cases shouldn't be decided by a jury?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:14:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Part 1: Behind the scenes of a seed round - Hippoland: adventures abound!</title><link>http://hippoland.tumblr.com/post/29555433091#comment-621434249</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Loved it.  Thanks for sharing!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:15:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 of tech's most powerful lawyers</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/gallery/technology/2012/08/07/powerful-lawyers.fortune/#comment-613943099</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wait, there's six people...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:03:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 5 will have at least a 4-inch screen, says WSJ | VentureBeat</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2012/05/16/iphone-5-will-have-4-inch-screen/#comment-530590141</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Follow the design leader :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:03:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft files complaint against Motorola in EU for ball-busting on essential patents | VentureBeat</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2012/02/22/microsoft-motorola-patent-ball-busting/#comment-446068024</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The number of patents is not relevant, so that's a stupid PR game that Heiner/Microsoft is playing.  It really depends on the importance and strength of those patents.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also I don't believe Microsoft is actually trying to play victim when they've laughed at Google over the past years for "thinking" Android was free to Google's OEM partners.  They put a strangle-hold on HTC and others with their own toll for their patents while doing a troll dance as the handset makers crossed their bridge.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:02:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It’s Official, Linsanity Is For Real | NewsFeed | TIME.com</title><link>http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/02/11/its-official-linsanity-is-for-real/#comment-438660443</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where did this misconception begin where Lin can't shoot?  Was it some uninformed NBA analysts on TV?  All you have to look at are the scouting reports and his college stats.  Lin shot 51.9% during his senior year at Harvard and almost 60% on 2 pointers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:14:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Acquires Social Summary Tool Summify</title><link>http://allthingsd.com/20120119/twitter-acquires-social-summary-tool-summify/#comment-415640513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sucks that they are shutting down Summify, but congratulations to their team.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:42:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: They Did It: Google Personalizes Search &amp; It Is Not Evil</title><link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/they_did_it_google_personalizes_search_it_is_not_e.php#comment-407591548</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jon, this is one of the most reasonable analysis out there.  Some rants have been a bit over the top.  The G+ search is simply an option.  Dept of Justice inquiry?  Please...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And it was Facebook and Twitter that have closed off their data to Google, so the anti-trust talk is simply stupid especially when Facebook is a walled garden and exceeds Google traffic in some metrics.Obvious point is that Google's monopoly on search has zero barriers.  Anyone can move to Bing or Yahoo or Baidu, etc. So where is the anti-trust in this?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:24:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tough negotiator: HP wanted $1.2B for webOS and Palm’s assets (exclusive) | VentureBeat</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2011/12/28/hp-palm-sale-price/#comment-396329546</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If true, that's just crazy.  It would be interesting to see the pitch deck and how they justified such a price.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernard Moon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 02:31:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>