<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for antezeta</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/antezeta/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/antezeta/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 04:59:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: An expat news fix? Win digital magazine subscriptions from Zinio</title><link>http://www.arttrav.com/expat-life/expat-win-digital-magazine-subscription-zinio/#comment-955068296</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Economist is probably one of the best sources of news analysis in English, although I also try to keep up with the New York Times and to a lesser extent the Guardian.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean Carlos</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 04:59:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Graph Search Now Passing Keyword Data To Webmasters</title><link>http://searchengineland.com/facebook-graph-search-now-passing-keyword-data-to-webmasters-152874#comment-841903578</link><description>&lt;p&gt;An alternative, and perhaps prefered, solution would be to simply add Facebook to Google Analytics' list of known search engines.   The GA tracking code in pages needs to be modified, adding something along the lines of _gaq.push(['_addOrganic','&lt;a href="http://facebook.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="facebook.com"&gt;facebook.com&lt;/a&gt;','q']).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean Carlos</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:36:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can Social Influence Be Distilled Into A Score? Part 2 &amp;#8211; Potential Pitfalls</title><link>http://marketingland.com/can-social-influence-be-distilled-into-a-score-part-2-potential-pitfalls-20224#comment-642936147</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I suspect that many perceive application installation requests on Facebook like as spam requests (= unsolicited &amp;amp; unwanted).  I haven't seen valid study data, but it isn't too difficult to arrive at this conclusion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean Carlos</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 01:16:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Only 9% Of Tech Blogs Implement Google Authorship Properly</title><link>http://searchengineland.com/only-9-of-tech-blogs-implement-google-authorship-properly-131869#comment-639665875</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If Conductor's survey only looked for rel="author" and rel=author then we may well have a dubious conclusion.  In one of Google's authorship markup iterations, they allowed for linking to Google+ profiles via a verified email address for the same domain as an author's articles.  A true analysis would have to take this into account, but since the email can be hidden, cannot I suspect.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean Carlos</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:29:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Only 9% Of Tech Blogs Implement Google Authorship Properly</title><link>http://searchengineland.com/only-9-of-tech-blogs-implement-google-authorship-properly-131869#comment-636896497</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Did you test your markup using Google's rich snippets simulator?  There's no guarantee that they'll actually use it though. &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets"&gt;http://www.google.com/webma...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean Carlos</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 08:22:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugly URLs Be Gone! Google+ Opens Vanity URLs For Certain Accounts</title><link>http://marketingland.com/ugly-urls-be-gone-google-opens-vanity-urls-for-certain-accounts-18787#comment-619208966</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fair point, but Google gets high marks in my book for their spam filtering system, including the flag as spam option :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean Carlos</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:05:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugly URLs Be Gone! Google+ Opens Vanity URLs For Certain Accounts</title><link>http://marketingland.com/ugly-urls-be-gone-google-opens-vanity-urls-for-certain-accounts-18787#comment-618779792</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For those who may have forgotten, individuals who had a Google profile with a gmail address before Google+ launched already have a vanity URL, e.g. &lt;a href="http://profiles.google.com/seancarlos" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://profiles.google.com/seancarlos"&gt;http://profiles.google.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean Carlos</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:06:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As The Yahoo-Microsoft Search Alliance Falls Short, Could A Yahoo-Google Deal Emerge?</title><link>http://searchengineland.com/yahoo-microsoft-search-alliance-google-127843#comment-592989503</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Baidu could supply Yahoo! with search results?  Nice idea, but it is my understanding that Baidu gets its English language results from... Bing. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ref: &lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/04/baidu-microsoft-idUSL3E7I410D20110704" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/04/baidu-microsoft-idUSL3E7I410D20110704"&gt;http://www.reuters.com/arti...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean Carlos</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 05:18:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enhance your blog or website with Google&amp;#8217;s Site Search. Measure the results in Google Analytics.</title><link>http://www.antezeta.com/blog/site-search/#comment-2379333</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The normal search engine crawling caveats still apply - if a page isn't publicly accessible, then it won't appear in Google's site specific search.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The best solution in this case is to consider hosting your own solution - consider one of the Enterprise solutions I mentioned.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is worth pointing out that there are plenty of &lt;a href="http://www.antezeta.com/avoid-search-engine-indexing.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.antezeta.com/avoid-search-engine-indexing.html"&gt;ways to stop search engines from accessing site content&lt;/a&gt;.  Any of these will stop pages or other site content from showing up in Google Site Search.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean Carlos</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:39:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>