<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for angiehaggstrom</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/angiehaggstrom/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/angiehaggstrom/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 19:41:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Survey: 52% of media professionals abandon websites when they hit a paywall</title><link>http://old.poynter.org/news/mediawire/174426/survey-52-of-media-professionals-abandon-websites-when-they-hit-a-paywall/#comment-532555389</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My opinion here is similar to Ryan Sholin's. I think a lot of people have a pre-conceived notion of a paywall. And considering how badly they've been done by a number of the big newspapers (and smaller ones), it's no surprise that people are biased against them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of the many newspapers who have turned to a paywall-based structure, some have done exceedingly well while others have failed miserably. I think a lot this stems from misunderstanding paywall conversions. Many see them as being based purely on the content, and this just isn't true. Sure, creating unique, quality content is important, but this only takes care of the interest portion of the sales process. A lot has to happen first. Trust, for example.&lt;br&gt;Think about it: You click a link expecting to see a really great piece of content and are suddenly told, "Oh sorry. We lied. You have to pay us first." Because you likely aren't familiar with the site, you have no idea if their definition of "quality" and "valuable" matches yours. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then, there's value. If the only option is a weekly, monthly, or annual subscription, you don't know whether there will be more content that's actually worth paying for. This is marketing 101. If I've never visited a site before, and the only option is to pay for a month's worth of content, am I going to bother? Not likely. I'll get the information some other way. But, the more I keep returning to a site, the more likely I am to give in and give up the cash.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another big error is targeting the wrong audience, expecting the wrong audience to pay, or failing to consider user intent. If I want to read an article purely for entertainment purposes, I'm not going to be as motivated to buy as I would be if I was using for research, for example.The failing of the newspaper industry has nothing to do with paywalls, in my opinion. It's the fact that they're putting a band aid on an unsustainable and poorly planned business model.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 19:41:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Save A Whole Lotta Time Setting Up Your New Laptop</title><link>http://charliesaidthat.com/digital/opinion/how-to-save-a-whole-lotta-time-setting-up-your-new-laptop/#comment-529200157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I sooo wish I'd have thought of this when I got the new iMac and Macbook. Would have made things much easier! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 07:30:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tell Her Movement - Facebook &amp; Twitter Party</title><link>http://appconnected.com/TellHerParty/index.html#comment-198113908</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's been very interesting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 22:39:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Social Media Platform Lifecycle (Part I)</title><link>http://charliesaidthat.com/digital/social-media/the-social-media-platform-lifecycle/#comment-175775745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I absolutely agree Charlie. Banking on a site being there forever is foolish, and basing your business off a single platform is downright stupid. Those famous words 'nothing lasts forever' ring true in the online world as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I really think the secret is forming relationships and bonds with your target market. Once you have that relationship, they follow you on other networks, and will invite you to join in when they make a switch.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:53:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rockmelt: My Thoughts and Review</title><link>http://www.whole-seo.com/rockmelt-thoughts-review/#comment-163361286</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a few quick thoughts:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I switched to Rockmelt and now use it for all my Web wandering. The only exception are moments when I need big SEO/dev addons. For that, you just can't beat FireFox.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With Rockmelt, sharing content on any of my social networks is a breeze, particularly now that I've added in the Delicious, Reddit, Digg, and StumbleUpon extensions. They all show up on the right sidebar (All of the extensions available in Chrome work in Rockmelt to my knowledge), so I just give the right one a quick click and I can move on to something else.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only thing I really hated were the Twitter notifications. They were such a pain in the royal you-know-what, they were the first things to go. I also removed Twitter from the sidebar, but I use Tweetdeck, so it was really just a redundant feature. Other than that, it just has the typical Chrome pitfalls.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 01:35:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media on Fox News &amp;#8211; The Future as we know it?</title><link>http://www.justinparks.com/social-media-fox-news-future/#comment-143346353</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought the MySpace addy was a nice touch at the bottom of the screen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 04:48:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media on Fox News &amp;#8211; The Future as we know it?</title><link>http://www.justinparks.com/social-media-fox-news-future/#comment-214706958</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought the MySpace addy was a nice touch at the bottom of the screen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 04:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media on Fox News &amp;#8211; The Future as we know it?</title><link>http://www.justinparks.com/social-media-fox-news-future/#comment-214706951</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought the MySpace addy was a nice touch at the bottom of the screen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 04:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media on Fox News &amp;#8211; The Future as we know it?</title><link>http://www.justinparks.com/social-media-fox-news-future/#comment-214706960</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought the MySpace addy was a nice touch at the bottom of the screen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 04:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Google results pages turning into the new landing pages</title><link>http://www.stateofsearch.com/results-pages-turning-into-the-new-landing-pages/#comment-468548090</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While this really sorta sucks for site owners (Google shouldn't be able to just take my content), I don't necessarily see it as a bad thing. It's simply a matter of using these features to our advantage.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The previews mean site owners are going to need to spend more time focusing on making a quality sites and planning their design/copy wisely instead of throwing something together and SEOing the hell out of it. That being said, I highly doubt it will mean the death of crap sites.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for snippets, Goog has been pushing the importance of 'user-friendly' snippets for quite a long time. This is just taking Orion one step further. Again, I think the trick is going to be combining clickable content with smart keyword usage. Instead of huge changes in SEO, I think it simply means that Google is giving user behaviour a more prominent role in SEO and marketing. That's the way it should be, isn't it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In short Peter, I think we're on relatively the same page with all these new fang-dangled toys.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sorta blows a hole in that '100% paid results' idea a few weeks back, doesn't it? They wouldn't add this feature to their paid results either, I don't think...it would defeat the purpose. *Flashes tin foil* I'd say it almost pushes site owners toward PPC and higher Google profits ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:41:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would you stay or leave this company?</title><link>http://cuberules.com/2010/04/28/would-you-stay-or-leave-this-company/#comment-47408070</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The idea that your job is secure and will be there tomorrow is nothing more than an illusion. No matter how long you've worked there, something can always happen, and people should be prepared.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That being said, the friend has work and it's obviously paying a decent amount. Also, there's no mention about what his work prospects are, and since good jobs aren't exactly plentiful, I'd be hesitant to give up an income you can be fairly sure will be there for the next two weeks. I say work it, but if something better (ie with a good contract and pay) comes up, take it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:51:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Taking Time Out for Health Reasons</title><link>http://dev.dannybrown.me/2010/03/19/taking-time-out-for-health-reasons/#comment-55245078</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sending tons of good thoughts your way. Hope you feel better really soon. If there's anything I can do for you, please let me know.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fellow Canuck&lt;br&gt;Angie&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:24:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Now Corrupting Lingual&amp;nbsp;Identity</title><link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-now-corrupting-lingual-identity/16322/#comment-40961113</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Alan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I did a bit of thinking about this whole spelling fiasco, and decided that I'd write a post in response rather than writing out all 700+ words here. In short, however, I think you and I have slightly different views in this instance. Always good for an informative discussion nonetheless. You can find it here: &lt;a href="http://seo.site-reference.com/optimising-optimization-google-spells-seos-crazy/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://seo.site-reference.com/optimising-optimization-google-spells-seos-crazy/"&gt;http://seo.site-reference.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:53:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Four Ways To Optimize Website Copy and Online Content</title><link>http://www.cloudmixer.com/four-ways-optimize-website-copy-online-content/#comment-22002814</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely Justin. I think the biggest reason for this is that people forget there's a difference between giving information and communicating. Think back to your school days...your history text book or your teacher...which did you like/respect more? Which one did you really learn the most from?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:11:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.justinparks.com/car-insurance-spain-linea-directa-taking-the-piss/</title><link>http://www.justinparks.com/car-insurance-spain-linea-directa-taking-the-piss/#comment-214707523</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While I'd expect there to be some differences in the price, that is a massive, massive jump. What is so special about Linea Directa that would warrant such a high cost? Sorry, but unless it's something serious, I have and maintain an anti-screw-me-over policy. I don't do it to my clients because I have this thing called morals, values, and respect for my fellow man. Business is business, after all ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:19:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Car insurance in Spain &amp;#8211; Linea Directa taking the piss?</title><link>http://www.justinparks.com/car-insurance-spain-linea-taking-the-piss/#comment-19436532</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While I'd expect there to be some differences in the price, that is a massive, massive jump. What is so special about Linea Directa that would warrant such a high cost? Sorry, but unless it's something serious, I have and maintain an anti-screw-me-over policy. I don't do it to my clients because I have this thing called morals, values, and respect for my fellow man. Business is business, after all ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:19:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Modern Online Content Program &amp;#8212; It Just Ain&amp;#8217;t What It Used to Be!</title><link>http://www.cloudmixer.com/modern-online-content-program/#comment-19262075</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Justin,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The switch over from traditional article marketing is quite slow (old habits die hard?), but when you look at all the benefits of article placement, there's just no reason not to use it. I think others would be quite pleased with the results; it's simply a matter of finding the right topic/style and site.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:14:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Warning: This is English Domain&amp;#8221;&amp;#8230; Atoall.com. What the heck?</title><link>http://matt-burgess.com/2009/09/warning-this-is-english-domain-atoall-com-what-the-heck/#comment-17793009</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've looked at this with several people and I have to respectfully disagree for two reasons:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First of all, the text is appearing directly ON the page, which you can see http://74.125.113.132/search?q=cache:&lt;a href="lQJlR6lEpk4J:www.speedtv.com/warning_this_is_english_domain_to_solve_this_problem_submit_site_in_atoall.com.html+" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="lQJlR6lEpk4J:www.speedtv.com/warning_this_is_english_domain_to_solve_this_problem_submit_site_in_atoall.com.html+"&gt;lQJlR6lEpk4J:www.speedtv.co...&lt;/a&gt;[warning_this_is_english_domain_to_solve_this_problem_submit_site_in_atoall.com.html]&amp;amp;cd=10&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ct=clnk&amp;amp;gl=au&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Secondly, these are NOT 404s. These are actual pages: &lt;a href="http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=%22submit+site+in+atoall.com%22&amp;amp;sourceid=navclient-ff&amp;amp;rlz=1B3GGGL_enCA346&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=%22submit+site+in+atoall.com%22&amp;amp;sourceid=navclient-ff&amp;amp;rlz=1B3GGGL_enCA346&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8"&gt;http://www.google.ca/search...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:39:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Warning: This is English Domain&amp;#8221;&amp;#8230; Atoall.com. What the heck?</title><link>http://matt-burgess.com/2009/09/warning-this-is-english-domain-atoall-com-what-the-heck/#comment-17748510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Matt, yes, it was actually another friend of mine who had thought to check the cache of the websites...very scary indeed. It's just a good thing you were paying attention! I'm really shocked that so many big websites have been hacked and don't know it! 15K? Yikes!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:19:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Graphic Design for a New Century</title><link>http://www.cloudmixer.com/design-for-a-new-century/#comment-17413570</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Peter,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You're right. Along with an increase in accessibility, our industries have seen an influx of what I like to call 'I-can-do-it-too's. And unfortunately, it has cheapened are professions something awful. They all figure they can get an article for $20, just like someone thinks they can get a logo or a brochure layout for $20. And it's sad.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for standardizing, I wonder if the graphic design world would have a lot of the same issues as those in SEO: things change too quickly, who should be in charge, who would be the authority, who would do the policing, what would the consequences be, etc. It is definitely something to ponder.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 01:33:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 Things You Didn&amp;#039t Know About Me</title><link>http://blog.sitefox.com/7-things-you-didnt-know-about-me/#comment-462880548</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jeepers Samir. I didn&amp;amp;#39t know we had that much in common! Classical music hehe now you&amp;amp;#39re in trouble :) I&amp;amp;#39m going to make you help me decide what I"m playing for Christmas lol&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 01:20:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 Things You Didn&amp;#039;t Know About Me</title><link>http://leftthebox.com/industry-news/7-things-you-didnt-know-about-me/#comment-17404384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jeepers Samir. I didn't know we had that much in common! Classical music hehe now you're in trouble :) I'm going to make you help me decide what I"m playing for Christmas lol&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:20:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Quality Copywriting Worth the Expense?</title><link>http://www.cloudmixer.com/quality-copywriting-worth-expense/#comment-17211925</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Frank,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If it got you to consider your own copy, then my work here is done ;) Glad you found it interesting! (And I'm happy to chat with you anytime!)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:28:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Quality Copywriting Worth the Expense?</title><link>http://www.cloudmixer.com/quality-copywriting-worth-expense/#comment-17143031</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Glenn, unfortunately so many people never stop to think of these things until it's too late. And lets face it, with so many companies reaching into the same pockets, for the same consumer dollars, there really isn't room for experimenting with copy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:15:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Quality Copywriting Worth the Expense?</title><link>http://www.cloudmixer.com/quality-copywriting-worth-expense/#comment-17142850</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi mjces,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Validating your services and convincing the client of that isn't easy, but it's the perfect opportunity to stretch your copywriting muscles. What makes you better and different than anyone else? What makes the content you write better than the content generated by machines? What will the customer gain when they hire you as a writer?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The idea is to show that you are a far better option and the client would be doing himself a disservice by not hiring you. By the time you're done telling him about how he'll benefit from hiring you, he'll completely forget about using previously distributed content or any other option he may have been considering. He won't be willing to accept anything less than you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Once you figure out the information your potential clients need, you need to decided where this information needs to be presented and which format will work best? Will you include it on your website? If so, where? Will you use a client brochure? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie Nikoleychuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:12:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>