<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for andrewlohr</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/andrewlohr/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/andrewlohr/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 18:15:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is Killing Innocents Christian? | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics</title><link>https://spectator.org/is-killing-innocents-christian/#comment-6883659811</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How d'you know it's evil?  You may not like triune Jehovah or His Biblical laws, but at least He lays down standards of right and wrong.  Where do your standards come from?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 18:15:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Grifters, Activism, and Thomas Massie | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics</title><link>https://spectator.org/grifters-activism-and-thomas-massie/#comment-6879365796</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What was wrong with opening the Epstein files?  &lt;br&gt;Didn't Trump himself promise to do so?  &lt;br&gt;Didn't he lost some poll numbers by hesitating?&lt;br&gt;And if most of the bad guys in the files are Democrats, ok, but face up any that aren't.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 22:25:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Does Donald Trump Squash Conservative Republicans? | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics</title><link>https://spectator.org/why-does-donald-trump-squash-conservative-republicans/#comment-6879364417</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I subscribe to NR, relevant or not.  And years before Trump ran I was posting that the GOP establishment and the Tea Party types needed to work together ("fusionism"?)  Since the RINOs didn't  give the right a fair shake, they were asking--and so was the liberal establishment--for Trump, who, whatever his many faults, didn't claim our votes and do nothing about our issues.  (He may be doing more of that now.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 22:19:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Does Donald Trump Squash Conservative Republicans? | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics</title><link>https://spectator.org/why-does-donald-trump-squash-conservative-republicans/#comment-6879362993</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Libertarian (small government) is good--Jesus Christ is libertarian, so so am I.  Mr Massie may've been anti-semitic, but releasing the Epstein files was good (hadn't president Trump[promised to do that?)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 22:13:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Capitalism Sinful?</title><link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2026/04/is-capitalism-sinful/#comment-6878981054</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Real estate can barely increase (drain a swamp); leave money aside; can one call it "increase of wealth" that George Washington may've been the richest American in his day, but we travel faster (cars and planes); communicate more easily (phones, email, web); we have air conditioning, electric lights and stoves and microwaves; poverty is way down since his day; prefer to call it increase of comforts?  The Creator created creative people in his image.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 01:27:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Christmas and Easter: Four Holidays?</title><link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2026/04/christmas-and-easter-four-holidays/#comment-6878975935</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, thanks for the distinction between Christmas and the other one then, and Easter and the other one then.  (C.S.Lewis had a little piece "Christmas and X-mas," in "God in the Dock," making a similar point about his Britain.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 00:49:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Capitalism Sinful?</title><link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2026/04/is-capitalism-sinful/#comment-6878974142</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have you compared the sharing in Jerusalem in Acts with Jeremiah buying Jerusalem real estate despite Nebuchadnezzar? Selling warned the old covenant was making way to the new.  Not insider trading, a public warning (Mt 24, etc.)  Elsewhere Christian were generous with weekly earnings.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 00:36:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deconstructing Evangelicalism</title><link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2026/05/deconstructing-evangelicalism-3/#comment-6878967994</link><description>&lt;p&gt;'Bible, cross, conversion, and activism' (Bebbington), and basic Christian orthodoxy?  Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 23:53:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Business Went Bad</title><link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/anxiousbench/2026/05/when-business-went-bad/#comment-6878965435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When did coveting and envy of what rich people have become good?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When did bullying, taking from one person and giving to another, become good? &lt;br&gt;When did politicians, who practice such bullying, become trustworthy?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To force equalization of money requires a non-equal Equalizer.  Who is like unto the IRS, and who is able to make war with Him?&lt;br&gt;To equalize money de-equalizes power; if you think the IRS is bad, try Stalin.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When government enforces monopolies, when it crushes competition so the rich can become richer instead of having to offer better services than their competitors, get rid of that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But if you can box better than Tyson Fury, and get people to pay to see you, go ahead.&lt;br&gt;(Making taxpayers pay for sports stadiums is another story.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 23:38:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Evangelicalism a Closed Club?</title><link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2026/05/evangelicalism-a-closed-club/#comment-6877676586</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes. Are you also concerned that pastor Doug Wilson, the CREC denomination, and "Christian Nationalists" get a fair shake?  &lt;br&gt;(At least in principle; I'm not dictating your interest level.)  Be faced, and not lied about?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(I heard Dr Geisler at an ETS meeting, late '80s, blasting Theonomy.  I remember asking him, after hearing his address, if the Bible should determine what we think of it.  I forget what he replied.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 01:03:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deconstructing Evangelicalism</title><link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2026/05/deconstructing-evangelicalism-3/#comment-6877672482</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Most of these articles seem to criticize evangelicalism.  (God is perfect and we're not so there's plenty to criticize, starting in a mirror, tho we puritan fundamentalists might often question different points than you would.)  Have you one, or plan one, setting forth what you think evangelicalism is or should be?  (I think commenter Glen B. Smith here has a similar request.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:28:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Every Interpretation of the Bible’s “Texts of Terror”</title><link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2026/03/every-interpretation-of-the-bibles-texts-of-terror/#comment-6877670323</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Literal, 3, may endorse executions and just wars today as Biblical, but 'exterminate the Caananites' was for Joshua and maybe down to Saul, not a permanent order of things.  (And we'd better be careful telling God what He can't do or say.)  Just as Jesus is Lord and Christ with His own  particular mission, yet also a man and in some ways an example for other men, so Israel was God's particular nation up to A.D. 70, yet in some ways an example for other nations--God advised against tax rates of 10% and against national service and eminent domain, for example (I Samuel 8); basic justice is that criminals owe restitution to their victims, and I think our prison-centered system could take a hint.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A modern novelist, Christian or not, may create, and be sovereign over, evil characters who do evil things, without ceasing to be a good person telling a good story--C. S. Lewis's White Witch in Lion Witch &amp;amp; Wardrobe, for instance.  Similarly with triune Jehovah.&lt;br&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:10:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pope Leo XIV’s Fatherly Balancing Act | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics</title><link>https://spectator.org/pope-leo-xivs-fatherly-balancing-act/#comment-6877300409</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Like what Kinsey the famous researcher found a lot of without concentrating on Roman Catholic priests (if indeed he studied them at all).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How does in-sin-you-ate-her sound?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 23:55:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pope Leo XIV’s Fatherly Balancing Act | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics</title><link>https://spectator.org/pope-leo-xivs-fatherly-balancing-act/#comment-6877299992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, if he has to excommunicate SSPX bishops, he might do well to make sure the formerly mandatory Tridentine Mass is actually available for those who want it, and to make clear that he is doing so.  Not just the SSPX is doing something out of line, but also that they don't need to.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 23:52:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When the Villagers Finally Have Had Enough of the Pillagers | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics</title><link>https://spectator.org/when-the-villagers-finally-have-had-enough-of-the-pillagers/#comment-6875647345</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Read (and sing) the Psalms in the Bible.  They say a lot about external enemies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've sung thru "The Book of Psalms for Singing" several dozen times.&lt;br&gt;Love triune Jehovah, love His lyrics (in some form or other.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think "exclusive psalmody" (sing nothing but Psalms in church) goes too far, but I favor "inclusive Psalmody" (make sure church singing includes all 150 Psalms one way or another.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 21:34:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Assassins Almost Always Go After Republicans | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics</title><link>https://spectator.org/why-assassins-almost-always-go-after-republicans/#comment-6869376386</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The other man Oswald tried to kill was a general too conservative for the Army.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 23:44:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Assassins Almost Always Go After Republicans | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics</title><link>https://spectator.org/why-assassins-almost-always-go-after-republicans/#comment-6869376282</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah.  And Lee Harvey Oswald was a communist more liberal than president Kennedy, who shot JFK for the personal reason of wanting to impress his wife and the political reason that he saw JFK as a gung-ho cold warrior.  &lt;br&gt;For that matter Sirhan Sirhan was also a communist (who shot JFK's brother Robert.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 23:43:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Calling the Pope ‘Liberal’ | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics</title><link>https://spectator.org/calling-the-pope-liberal/#comment-6866811330</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, if God doesn't listen to the prayers of warmakers, and Islamic terrorists are warmakers, then God does not hear their prayers.  &lt;br&gt;Would the pope agree that his meaning includes this?&lt;br&gt;What about supporters of Islamic terrorism, such as Dems just nominated in Michigan?  &lt;br&gt;Does God hear their prayers?  Would the pope openly say He does not?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 20:43:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Calling the Pope ‘Liberal’ | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics</title><link>https://spectator.org/calling-the-pope-liberal/#comment-6866810313</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Martin Luther said that if you preach the whole gospel except the one point being contested right now, you're not preaching the gospel.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 20:40:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pope Leo on Peace, War, and Conscience | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics</title><link>https://spectator.org/pope-leo-on-peace-war-and-conscience/#comment-6852651811</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let Christians consider this, indeed, but does he have a word for Secularists, Muslims, and others?  God in the Bible emphasizes His own people, but He does  also speak to those heading, unless they repent, for Hell and  for the Resurrection of Damnation, not just those already heading for Heaven and for the Resurrection of Life, who still have our own sins to repent of but are working on it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 21:56:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If FDR Had Killed Hitler? | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics</title><link>https://spectator.org/if-fdr-had-killed-hitler/#comment-6851326603</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A British military attache in Berlin in the A.D. 1930s offered to assassinate Hitler--he had a clear shot from his office to a podium Hitler would speak at, or something like that--but his superiors told him not to.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 23:55:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: National Review Sides with the War Party Again - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics</title><link>https://spectator.org/national-review-sides-with-the-war-party-again/#comment-6665409675</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Who started the shooting?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:33:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: National Review Sides with the War Party Again - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics</title><link>https://spectator.org/national-review-sides-with-the-war-party-again/#comment-6665409026</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gulf of America is ridiculous; the old name is fine.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:30:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: National Review Sides with the War Party Again - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics</title><link>https://spectator.org/national-review-sides-with-the-war-party-again/#comment-6665408645</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stone cold realist's 3-day-war is 3 years old?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:29:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: National Review Sides with the War Party Again - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics</title><link>https://spectator.org/national-review-sides-with-the-war-party-again/#comment-6665408330</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Didn't Mr McCarthy vote for Trump in A.D. 2020?  I could be wrong, but I seem to recall three NR writers, McCarthy voting for Trump, Mr Cooke? not voting?, and someone else (Mr McLaughlin?) voting for a 3rd party?   And while blaming president Trump for the blowup with president Zelensky, Andy did say Z had behaved incompetently.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewlohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:27:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>