<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for andrerobitaille</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/andrerobitaille/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/andrerobitaille/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:17:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Sexism and the religion of hackers</title><link>http://www.room362.com/archives/614-sexism-and-the-religion-of-hackers.html#comment-12612894</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that the cartoon isn't sexist, and most likely reflects the artist's real life experience of someone's girlfriend or something. And I also agree that it's not worth getting excited over - people should learn to choose their battles.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, my first thought about the cartoon was, "Why is the girl the no-nothing cheerleader"?  It may not be the responsibility of every creative person to be politically correct, but this particular choice of the cheerleader seemed to just be more stupid than sexist. She just served no purpose that I could identify. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrerobitaille</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:17:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>