<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for andersw</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/andersw/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/andersw/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 08:10:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Prometheus (Review)</title><link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/2-12-stars/prometheus-review/#comment-545653958</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Editor here. This error has been fixed. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 08:10:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death of the Cinematic Experience</title><link>http://moviedex.com/features/opinion/the-death-of-the-cinematic-experience/#comment-487707384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're right, I didn't go into that in any great detail, but that was more a deliberate omission than anything else. I feel cinema etiquette deserves an article all on its own, and has been discussed quite a bit in recent times. Though I wholeheartedly concur; the best of projections can be ruined by a teenager and his/her phone, or a rowdy child and his/her oblivious parents. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:00:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death of the Cinematic Experience</title><link>http://moviedex.com/features/opinion/the-death-of-the-cinematic-experience/#comment-487703935</link><description>&lt;p&gt;  I hear about this place often, especially their no-nonsense approach to&lt;br&gt; mobile phones, which is wonderful. Their loyal following -- and the &lt;br&gt;fact that I even know about them, despite being on the other side of the&lt;br&gt; planet -- exemplifies how good customer service and having the viewer's&lt;br&gt; experience in mind is key to the whole issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:56:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death of the Cinematic Experience</title><link>http://moviedex.com/features/opinion/the-death-of-the-cinematic-experience/#comment-487702364</link><description>&lt;p&gt; I hear about this place often, especially their no-nonsense approach to mobile phones, which is wonderful. Their loyal following -- and the fact that I even know about them, despite being on the other side of the planet -- exemplifies how good customer service and having the viewer's experience in mind is key to solving the whole issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:54:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death of the Cinematic Experience</title><link>http://moviedex.com/features/opinion/the-death-of-the-cinematic-experience/#comment-487699562</link><description>&lt;p&gt; A very similar experience to mine. After hearing people rave about Hugo's 3D, I was sorely disappointing by it. I could tell, however, that it was less the film's fault as it was the projection. In my screening, where I sat in the dead centre of the cinema for "best results", it looked like two images competing for the screen. Very distracting. Very ironic, too, given the message of the movie.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The fact that you had to watch them toy with image whilst it was playing is just not acceptable. Can they not test the projection before each screening? And, as you say, have a standard in mind? Apparently not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you for sharing!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:51:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mirror Mirror (Review)</title><link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/3-12-stars/mirror-mirror-review/#comment-477847751</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Disney, in fact, had nothing to do with this film. With the story being in the Public Domain, no one owns the copyright to the fairytale, which is how Disney were able to make the film in the first pace. And while Disney's may be the most definitive version of the story, it was far from being the first and nor was it ever going to be the last. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:28:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Berlinale Blog: Day 1</title><link>http://moviedex.com/features/berlinale-blog-day-1/#comment-473402940</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the tip Jubri! I'll do my best to blog each day. I'm notoriously picky with my food, but I might just have to suck it up and make an exception for the kebab. I'm already indulging on their pretzles...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:36:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Berlinale Blog: Day 1</title><link>http://moviedex.com/features/berlinale-blog-day-1/#comment-432773173</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the tip Jubri! I'll do my best to blog each day. I'm notoriously picky with my food, but I might just have to suck it up and make an exception for the kebab. I'm already indulging on their pretzles...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:36:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chronicle (Review)</title><link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/2-12-stars/chronicle-review/#comment-473402939</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is why I need an proof reader. Thank you!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:47:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chronicle (Review)</title><link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/chronicle-review/#comment-426822993</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is why I need an proof reader. Thank you!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:47:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Bought a Zoo (Review)</title><link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/3-12-stars/we-bought-a-zoo-review/#comment-473402932</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Sam. Happy Holidays to you too! &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm not really a Cameron Crowe fan or hater; just indifferent.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 01:54:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Bought a Zoo (Review)</title><link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/we-bought-a-zoo-review/#comment-396150041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Sam. Happy Holidays to you too! &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm not really a Cameron Crowe fan or hater; just indifferent.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 20:54:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Bought a Zoo (Review)</title><link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/3-12-stars/we-bought-a-zoo-review/#comment-473402931</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Andrew, I wasn't sold on the supporting characters personally, but Damon was more than enough to make up for them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 06:43:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Bought a Zoo (Review)</title><link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/we-bought-a-zoo-review/#comment-393552021</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Andrew, I wasn't sold on the supporting characters personally, but Damon was more than enough to make up for them. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 01:43:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Burning Man (Review)</title><link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/4-stars/burning-man-review/#comment-473402930</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Carryanna, thank you for your astuteness.  What Tom needed was an Editor, which is my role, but I clearly dropped the ball on this one.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I corrected the instances of "losing", "one's" and "recognisable". However, I can find no instance where "its" or "it's" is incorrectly used. Care to enlighten me?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 06:26:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Burning Man (Review)</title><link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/burning-man-review/#comment-389088516</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Carryanna, thank you for your astuteness.  What Tom needed was an Editor, which is my role, but I clearly dropped the ball on this one.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I corrected the instances of "losing", "one's" and "recognisable". However, I can find no instance where "its" or "it's" is incorrectly used. Care to enlighten me?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 01:26:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interview: Chris Miller, director of PUSS IN BOOTS</title><link>http://moviedex.com/interviews/interview-chris-miller-director-of-puss-in-boots/#comment-473218815</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great interview Dan. Excellent questions and Chris sounds like a fun-loving fella. Really enjoyed it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 07:17:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interview: Chris Miller, director of PUSS IN BOOTS</title><link>http://cutprintreview.com/interviews/interview-chris-miller-director-of-puss-in-boots/#comment-380945174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great interview Dan. Excellent questions and Chris sounds like a fun-loving fella. Really enjoyed it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 02:17:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Three Musketeers [2011] (Review)</title><link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/12-star/the-three-musketeers-2011-review/#comment-473402928</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yikes, my mistake! This has little to do with the book, as in general, there is no such thing as a Duke of England! All fixed now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 17:29:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Three Musketeers [2011] (Review)</title><link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/the-three-musketeers-2011-review/#comment-350723981</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yikes, my mistake! This has little to do with the book, as in general, there is no such thing as a Duke of England! All fixed now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 13:29:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Three Musketeers [2011] (Review)</title><link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/12-star/the-three-musketeers-2011-review/#comment-473402929</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To be honest, this was less of a question and more of a snarky segue, but I admit, that was hardly clear. I am actually aware of why. Thanks for the comment though!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 01:58:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Three Musketeers [2011] (Review)</title><link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/the-three-musketeers-2011-review/#comment-348600765</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To be honest, this was less of a question and more of a snarky segue, but I admit, that was hardly clear. I am actually aware of why. Thanks for the comment though!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 21:58:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paranormal Activity 3 (Review)</title><link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/2-stars/paranormal-activity-3-review/#comment-473402923</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I certainly felt betrayed after rewatching the trailer and realising just how different it was. It's unethical, to be sure. The issue hasn't nearly as much attention as it deserves. This simply cannot become the norm....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:50:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paranormal Activity 3 (Review)</title><link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/2-stars/paranormal-activity-3-review/#comment-473402921</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the first "spooky" moment when he's in the girls' room and the closet door shuts? The sex tape occurred after this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:42:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paranormal Activity 3 (Review)</title><link>http://moviedex.com/reviews/paranormal-activity-3-review/#comment-348242131</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I certainly felt betrayed after rewatching the trailer and realising just how different it was. It's unethical, to be sure. The issue hasn't nearly as much attention as it deserves. This simply cannot become the norm....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anders</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:50:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>