<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for and_dang</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/and_dang/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/and_dang/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 16:53:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Predictive Maintenance for Aerospace | Cortana Intelligence Gallery</title><link>https://gallery.cortanaintelligence.com/Solution/9e666e63007a4cd7a479ed7d18ecb87b#comment-3836098837</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No, there are no plans on making the generator code available. It's a pretty old example and useful for only so much, mainly to show the base experiment and and example architecture.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is there a reason you want to still use this example but modify it for IOT hub? If you are courting a customer, perhaps making a new example would be a good choice?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is there a reason, which you may have already stated, that you are required to continue to use this example but want to modify the generator?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 16:53:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Predictive Maintenance for Aerospace | Cortana Intelligence Gallery</title><link>https://gallery.cortanaintelligence.com/Solution/9e666e63007a4cd7a479ed7d18ecb87b#comment-3800612097</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Girish,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is no easy way as the code isn't available. However, sending events to IOT Hub is pretty straightforward (&lt;a href="https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/iot-hub/iot-hub-csharp-csharp-getstarted)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/iot-hub/iot-hub-csharp-csharp-getstarted)"&gt;https://docs.microsoft.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This example was done a long time again before IOT Hub, so there is no code switch available for it, unfortunately.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You could, if IOT Hub is essential to your project, create an Azure Queue, Azure IOT Hub, and an Azure Function that triggers on the queue.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Modify the Azure Stream Analytics job to read from the event hub.&lt;br&gt;Create an azure function that triggers on a queue, then update the code to de-queue the messages and forward them along to the IOT Hub. (Along with the device management that would be required).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This would be the easiest route without having to re-write a data generator, again code is not available but I recall there is some complex logic when the source file feeding it rolls over.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, the other option is to re-wire the stream job for an IOT Hub and feed your own data in, which then assumes you will be changing the storage/ML model/etc to deal with your data?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 06:53:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Predictive Maintenance for Aerospace | Cortana Intelligence Gallery</title><link>https://gallery.cortanaintelligence.com/Solution/9e666e63007a4cd7a479ed7d18ecb87b#comment-3746745066</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The region for Data Factory is baked into the deployment primarily because it's only supported in a handful of the regions. So yes, that's OK and expected. If it wasn't pushed to a region that would support it, the deployment would fail.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You can find more about regions and services here &lt;a href="https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/regions/services/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/regions/services/"&gt;https://azure.microsoft.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 06:39:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Predictive Maintenance for Aerospace | Cortana Intelligence Gallery</title><link>https://gallery.cortanaintelligence.com/Solution/9e666e63007a4cd7a479ed7d18ecb87b#comment-3745667792</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Would sure be good if we could see the whole line of the error. Is there a log in the directory that the executable runs in? Wondering if it's just a configuration issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 13:56:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Predictive Maintenance for Aerospace | Cortana Intelligence Gallery</title><link>https://gallery.cortanaintelligence.com/Solution/9e666e63007a4cd7a479ed7d18ecb87b#comment-3745069308</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Girish,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The deployment is done via ARM Templates (&lt;a href="https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-resource-manager/resource-group-authoring-templates)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-resource-manager/resource-group-authoring-templates)"&gt;https://docs.microsoft.com/...&lt;/a&gt; the which have not been made available via github or the the Azure Quick Start (&lt;a href="https://start.cortanaintelligence.com/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://start.cortanaintelligence.com/)"&gt;https://start.cortanaintell...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Primarily, they are not available as they are run in a larger context that preserves state between scripts and allows the execution of Azure Functions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would suggest becoming familiar with the steps on creation through the portal then automate that in your own environment using your own ARM templates.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 07:10:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Predictive Maintenance for Aerospace | Cortana Intelligence Gallery</title><link>https://gallery.cortanaintelligence.com/Solution/9e666e63007a4cd7a479ed7d18ecb87b#comment-3739000418</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Right, it's not a component of the system. It feeds the Event Hub to put data into the pipeline. Run it from your desktop or set up a VM to have it run indefinitely.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 11:28:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Predictive Maintenance for Aerospace | Cortana Intelligence Gallery</title><link>https://gallery.cortanaintelligence.com/Solution/9e666e63007a4cd7a479ed7d18ecb87b#comment-3737702430</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nope not for this one. Only the .NET version that's there.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 14:55:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Predictive Maintenance for Aerospace | Cortana Intelligence Gallery</title><link>https://gallery.cortanaintelligence.com/Solution/9e666e63007a4cd7a479ed7d18ecb87b#comment-3737296542</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One thing to keep in mind, the instructions might be a little outdated. I just looked and it still references &lt;a href="http://manage.windowsazure.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="manage.windowsazure.com"&gt;manage.windowsazure.com&lt;/a&gt;, now all actions are preformed through &lt;a href="http://portal.azure.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="portal.azure.com"&gt;portal.azure.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 11:01:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Predictive Maintenance for Aerospace | Cortana Intelligence Gallery</title><link>https://gallery.cortanaintelligence.com/Solution/9e666e63007a4cd7a479ed7d18ecb87b#comment-3737280064</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I found the git repo that contains the information and the PBI templates, etc. There are also full instructions for deployment in the Technical Deployment Guide&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://github.com/Azure/cortana-intelligence-predictive-maintenance-aerospace" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://github.com/Azure/cortana-intelligence-predictive-maintenance-aerospace"&gt;https://github.com/Azure/co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 10:51:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Predictive Maintenance for Aerospace | Cortana Intelligence Gallery</title><link>https://gallery.cortanaintelligence.com/Solution/9e666e63007a4cd7a479ed7d18ecb87b#comment-3731589656</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Girish,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Each of the solutions is different so there is no set of inventory that is all encompassing for every one of them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the Predictive Maintenance I believe the list of providers that need to be registered on your subscription are (Portal&amp;gt;Subscriptions&amp;gt;YourSubscription&amp;gt;ResourceProviders):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Microsoft.DataFactory&lt;br&gt;Microsoft.EventHub&lt;br&gt;Microsoft.HDInsight&lt;br&gt;Microsoft.StreamAnalytics&lt;br&gt;Microsoft.Sql&lt;br&gt;Microsoft.PowerBI&lt;br&gt;Microsoft.MachineLearning&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Enabling these providers *should* allow you to deploy the whole solution in one go.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 07:31:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Predictive Maintenance for Aerospace | Cortana Intelligence Gallery</title><link>https://gallery.cortanaintelligence.com/Solution/9e666e63007a4cd7a479ed7d18ecb87b#comment-3727584736</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, but there are several touch points in that pipeline. What you will end up with is the base architecture, but you'll need to modify the pipeline and model for your specific purposes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:12:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Predictive Maintenance for Aerospace | Cortana Intelligence Gallery</title><link>https://gallery.cortanaintelligence.com/Solution/9e666e63007a4cd7a479ed7d18ecb87b#comment-3726254914</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Girish, you should probably look at the architecture image that is supplied. There are no VM's....and the location/region is wherever you decide it should be. You would need to deploy this in your own subscription. It is secure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the end, it's an example that shows you *how* you could create a solution like this. This is not a production ready deployment as there is no way to know what type of aircraft you are trying to predict for.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:51:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Predictive Maintenance for Aerospace | Cortana Intelligence Gallery</title><link>https://gallery.cortanaintelligence.com/Solution/9e666e63007a4cd7a479ed7d18ecb87b#comment-3648675839</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Try using just the name of the event hub not the full name...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 21:16:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Predictive Maintenance for Aerospace | Cortana Intelligence Gallery</title><link>https://gallery.cortanaintelligence.com/Solution/9e666e63007a4cd7a479ed7d18ecb87b#comment-3560844354</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, if you read the top of that posting:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;THIS GALLERY ITEM IS IN MAINTENANCE, WILL BE BACK SOON&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some of the resources were taken down as they had outlived their usefulness.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 13:29:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Water main break snarls traffic, frustrates residents, businesses</title><link>http://www.eagletribune.com/archive/x355876461/Water-main-break-snarls-traffic-frustrates-residents-businesses#comment-98306566</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And.....$5mm to redo main street, and no one thought to replace 100+ year old pipes when the street was open? State work.....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:26:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Patrick: Sales tax cut would be 'calamity'</title><link>http://www.eagletribune.com/archive/x847472156/Patrick-Sales-tax-cut-would-be-calamity#comment-88584044</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But our neighbors to the north don't have a 5.3% income tax either....don't continue any myths....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:52:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Many lift, get lift from ClownTown</title><link>http://www.andovertownsman.com/archive/x1700431996/Many-lift-get-lift-from-ClownTown#comment-50732776</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Love clown town, but the cost is fairly prohibitive. Yes, it's a great fund raiser, but how many kids in town don't or can't go because of the costs involved.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Honestly, you can spend a full day with the family at Canobie AND eat out for the cost of about 4 hours at this event.....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 14:32:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefighter found dead at Ward Reservation</title><link>http://www.eagletribune.com/permalink/local_story_085005438.html#comment-41783897</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Grecoe family sends thier condolences.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:18:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Town Meeting article seeks to reverse recent street light shutoff</title><link>http://www.eagletribune.com/permalink/local_story_067012737.html#comment-38546471</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While we're at it, lets also put on the vote to repeal the hotel and meals tax. You know, it could be a regular town meeting vote to go back and forth with...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:18:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hotels filled to capacity due to last week's windstorm</title><link>http://www.eagletribune.com/permalink/local_story_061002931.html#comment-37600513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good thing all the lemmings voted on the hotel tax! So, now that you were out of your house due to the weather, you could pay an additional 2% in stupid tax to the town, not to mention the additional tax on the food you had to eat while you were out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All for the price of a cup of coffee (or a few pots of it depending on how much time you had to spend out of your house).....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:49:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Light fight goes to vote</title><link>http://www.andovertownsman.com/permalink/local_story_034160647.html#comment-33940695</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The same dimwits that believe saving a dime here, a quarter there starts to add up to real savings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Heywood hit it on the head, but in all seriousness, there's no law that you have to live in Andover, or even visit it. Thats the beauty of America, you can move wherever you think you'll be happier. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:30:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lawmakers to Lantigua: Resign from House or city bailout bill is dead</title><link>http://www.eagletribune.com/permalink/local_story_042000013.html#comment-33835974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In some sense, you're right he doesnt care. But out the other side of his mouth he claims that the electorate wanted him to have both jobs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think that is less than truthful. The fact is, during his campaign run, he did say he would step down if elected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But the point is, you care or you don't care what people say, but it cant be both.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let the control board in. Slick Willy has no experience running a municipality. It's not that the state guys will be much better, but it will give the city a chance. Letting this guy have a go will only put Lawrence further behind.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:23:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some balking at new water meters</title><link>http://www.andovertownsman.com/permalink/local_story_034160229.html#comment-32616772</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Honestly, I recieved one letter and set up an appointment. When the contractor arrived, he looked at the meter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The last owner did some floor work down there and it's partially buried in concrete. The contractor said to jackhammer it out and they'd come back.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fat chance of that happening. I'm not about to take a day out of my busy schedule with work and kids to rent a jackhammer and rip up a portion of the floor to make the contractors and the water departments life easier.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Guys, if it's so much better, be prepared to do what it takes to get the job done. This is to make YOUR life easier in collecting my money through ever increasing water rates. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:48:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Letter: Union decision highlights what wrong with Massachusetts leadership</title><link>http://www.andovertownsman.com/permalink/local_story_021124359.html#comment-30740850</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very well written. I think you have covered the general feel of the population. Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:24:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lantigua restricts take-home cruiser use</title><link>http://www.eagletribune.com/permalink/local_story_012041519.html#comment-29831625</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But did fireladder45 as well. Geez, the guy needs to learn how to type....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't agree with the grief they are getting though, they are buying thier own food on thier "lunch break" or whatever it is. Just like everyone else here, they do have to eat and they are alloted that time in thier day. So, they take the truck, big whoop, at least they know it runs right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another benefit. Say they all take thier personal cars to the shop to buy thier lunch/dinner/breakfast (whatever) and an emergency happens. They, at least, have thier equipment with them and are prepared. Unlike most people whining here, they are on call thier WHOLE shift, there is no real time off type lunch break.....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">and_dang</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:37:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>