<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of alvinashcraft</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/alvinashcraft/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/alvinashcraft/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:00:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: MSI Wind U123 gets officialer</title><link>(u'http://liliputing.com/2009/04/msi-wind-u123-gets-officialer.html',%208115982L)#comment-8115982</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why the crappy resolutions?  What about 1280 x 800 like the HP 2133?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:43:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WSJ fans flames of Apple netbook rumors</title><link>(u'https://liliputing.com/2009/04/wsj-fans-flames-of-apple-netbook-rumors.html',%208116957L)#comment-8116957</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I might actually buy an Apple if they had a decent, not super expensive netbook.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:54:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WSJ fans flames of Apple netbook rumors</title><link>(u'https://liliputing.com/2009/04/wsj-fans-flames-of-apple-netbook-rumors.html',%208195657L)#comment-8195657</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Try the Business HP netbooks.  They are aluminum.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:18:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HP: Netbooks not cannibalizing larger PC sales&amp;#8230; much</title><link>(u'http://liliputing.com/2009/04/hp-netbooks-not-cannibalizing-larger-pc-sales-much.html',%208234151L)#comment-8234151</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If they released a laptop I'd use...must have WUXGA screen and a mini combo for a decent price...I'd buy them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:51:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sharp to launch a netbook next week</title><link>(u'http://liliputing.com/2009/04/sharp-to-launch-a-netbook-next-week.html',%208234227L)#comment-8234227</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You mean like IBM did 10 years ago?  &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_keyboard" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_keyboard"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:55:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What you want in a netbook: Price and size</title><link>(u'http://liliputing.com/2009/04/what-you-want-in-a-netbook-price-and-size.html',%208293898L)#comment-8293898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's not about screen size, it's about resolution.  A 10 in screen with a 576 vertical resolution?  WTF.  At least do 768 or even 800.  And price?  $500 really?  Why would I want a netbook when I could get a laptop?  Especially if the battery life is the same?  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:59:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Netbook effect: &amp;#8220;Laptops over $1000 are basically dead&amp;#8221;</title><link>(u'http://liliputing.com/2009/04/the-netbook-effect-laptops-over-1000-are-basically-dead.html',%208770894L)#comment-8770894</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems like I'm in the minority, but I want a decked out laptop with 1900x1200 resolution with at least 4GB of ram....AND a netbook.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:26:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: System76 launches Starling Netbook with Ubuntu 9.04</title><link>(u'https://liliputing.com/2009/04/system76-launches-starling-netbook-with-ubuntu-904.html',%208780597L)#comment-8780597</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't get that.  Is it true 16:9 or something?  I'd rather have more.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:22:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Virtual Worlds: 20+ Tools for Creating 3D Graphics and Environments</title><link>(u'http://mashable.com/2008/07/10/tools-for-3d-creation/',%209242901L)#comment-9242901</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Truespace 7 is now free as well.  &lt;a href="http://www.caligari.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.caligari.com/"&gt;http://www.caligari.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:47:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First look at the HP Mini 5101 business class netbook</title><link>(u'https://liliputing.com/2009/06/first-look-at-the-hp-mini-5101-business-class-netbook.html',%2011680931L)#comment-11680931</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I liked it until someone mentioned the bezel.  I'm still debating on getting a 2133.  Though most say those are slow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:10:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dell Inspiron Mini 10 now available with GPS (really this time)</title><link>(u'https://liliputing.com/2009/07/dell-inspiron-mini-10-now-available-with-gps-really-this-time.html',%2012320609L)#comment-12320609</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While I think GPS is awesome and I want this, I'm not sure why I'd need it.  Not like I'll be hiking with a mini.  Car...Ya I guess.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:41:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Update: Apple still thinks netbooks stink</title><link>(u'http://liliputing.com/2009/07/update-apple-still-thinks-netbooks-stink.html',%2013125792L)#comment-13125792</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apple will poo-poo netbooks until it releases it's own and then they will be great and they will claim they came up with it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:09:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple, Verizon could launch tablet in time for the holidays</title><link>(u'http://liliputing.com/2009/07/apple-verizon-could-launch-tablet-in-time-for-the-holidays.html',%2013211913L)#comment-13211913</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Newton II?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:55:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave: Better than Twitter for Conference Chatter?</title><link>(u'http://mashable.com/2009/11/08/google-wave-better-than-twitter-conference/',%2022435416L)#comment-22435416</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can twitter from everywhere, not so on Wave...Yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:16:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Liliputing Holiday Giveaway: HP Mini 311 NVIDIA ION powered notebook</title><link>(u'http://liliputing.com/2009/12/liliputing-holiday-giveaway-hp-mini-311-nvidia-ion-powered-notebook.html',%2026263924L)#comment-26263924</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd definitely use it for some mobile programming.  Take it to user groups and conferences for notes and whatnot. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:06:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Haleron introduces a 10 inch Atom powered tablet</title><link>(u'http://liliputing.com/2010/01/haleron-introducs-a-10-inch-atom-powered-tablet.html',%2027999652L)#comment-27999652</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Besides the crappy battery life that looks cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:48:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Codemash 2010 and the Smartphone Throwdown &amp;ndash; Windows Mobile vs iPhone vs Android vs Blackberry vs Palm</title><link>(u'http://keithelder.net/2010/01/18/codemash-2010-and-the-smartphone-throwdown-ndash-windows-mobile-vs/',%20140696439L)#comment-140696439</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder how the swype Android keyboard would have fared.  Or my favorite from winmo Touchpal.  Touchpal on Android wasn't as refined as winmo.  This was my first Codemash.  Very cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 04:20:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Codemash 2010 and the Smartphone Throwdown &amp;ndash; Windows Mobile vs iPhone vs Android vs Blackberry vs Palm</title><link>(u'http://keithelder.net/2010/01/18/codemash-2010-and-the-smartphone-throwdown-ndash-windows-mobile-vs/',%20140696449L)#comment-140696449</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bummer I was hoping for good things with that one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 04:53:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;rsquo;m writing a MVVM book &amp;ndash; What would you like to see in it?</title><link>(u'http://elegantcode.com/2010/03/14/im-writing-an-mvvm-book-what-would-you-like-to-see-in-it/',%20144313076L)#comment-144313076</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Real examples, examples on what to do with non-MVVM friendly controls, like the WPF toolkit controls.  How to get data and messages around the application.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:12:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Engadget's back to school giveaway, part one: win $1,500 worth of gear!</title><link>(u'http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/31/engadgets-back-to-school-giveaway-part-one-win-1-500-worth-o/',%2074249036L)#comment-74249036</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can you win the Trapper Keeper?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:08:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Impressions Of The Ruby Community</title><link>(u'http://thatextramile.be/blog/2010/08/first-impressions-of-the-ruby-community',%20132588859L)#comment-132588859</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The only negativity I've really seen from the .NET community was usually from the ALT.NET community.  It was probably just my perspective but it seems that they complain the most, especially about Microsoft and their practices.  Which is fine, but it gives me that bad community vibe.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can attest to Mr. Hanselman responding to emails.  He responded to one of mine years ago.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:16:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Android Is As Open As The Clenched Fist I’d Like To Punch The Carriers With</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/09/android-open/',%2076430705L)#comment-76430705</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pretty sure MG doesn't understand what openness is.  He is of course brainwashed by Apple, so not surprise there.  That said I have a Sprint branded phone, sans all crapware. I had to root but who cares.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:06:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sorry Google but my next phone will be an iPhone</title><link>(u'http://openmymind.net/2010/9/14/Sorry-Google-but-my-next-phone-will-be-an-iPhone',%2077661573L)#comment-77661573</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Really?  You are blaming Google for the handset manufacturers and carriers crapware?  Does this really deserve a blog post?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:16:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LaCie pushes serious pixels on 24-inch 324i professional IPS display</title><link>(u'http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/21/lacie-pushes-serious-pixels-on-24-inch-324i-professional-ips-dis/',%2079804863L)#comment-79804863</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Remember when you could get a 24in monitor in 1920x1200 resolution?  Hint: It was before 1080p became popular for TV's and since they have chinced you 120 pixels. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:36:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Epic 4G: problems so far -- and a few solutions</title><link>(u'http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/29/epic-4g-problems-so-far-and-a-few-solutions/',%2082131769L)#comment-82131769</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm pretty sure no one is allowed to complain about Apple bugs, that is why you don't hear about any for long.  Like there were no antenna issues, you were just holding it wrong.  Here take a rubberband and fix it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nportelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:00:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>